Open Access

Socio economic crisis and mortality. Epidemiological testimony of the financial collapse of Argentina

  • Enrique P Gurfinkel1Email author,
  • Gerardo E Bozovich2,
  • Omar Dabbous3,
  • Branco Mautner1 and
  • Frederick Anderson3
Thrombosis Journal20053:22

DOI: 10.1186/1477-9560-3-22

Received: 18 October 2005

Accepted: 13 December 2005

Published: 13 December 2005



Natural disasters, war, and terrorist attacks, have been linked to cardiac mortality. We sought to investigate whether a major financial crisis may impact on the medical management and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.


We analyzed the Argentine cohort of the international multicenter Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). The primary objective was to estimate if there was an association between the financial crisis period (April 1999 to December 2002) and in- hospital cardiovascular mortality, with the post-crisis period (January 2003 to September 2004) as the referent. Each period was defined according to the evolution of the Gross Domestic Product. We investigated the demographic characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, morbidity and mortality.


We analyzed data from 3220 patients, 2246 (69.8%) patients in the crisis period and 974 (30.2%) in the post-crisis frame. The distribution of demographic and clinical baseline characteristics were not significantly different between both periods. During the crisis period the incidence of in-hospital myocardial infarction was higher (6.9% Vs 2.9%; p value < 0.0001), as well as congestive heart failure (16% Vs 11%; p value < 0.0001). Time to intervention with angioplasty was longer during the crisis, especially among public sites (median 190 min Vs 27 min). The incidence proportion of mortality during hospitalization was 6.2% Vs 5.1% after crisis. The crude OR for mortality was 1.2 (95% C.I. 0.87, 1.7). The odds for mortality were higher among private institutions {1.9 (95% C.I. 0.9, 3.8)} than for public centers {1.2 (95% C.I. 0.83, 1.79)}. We did not observe a significant interaction between type of hospital and crisis.


Our findings suggest that the financial crisis may have had a negative impact on cardiovascular mortality during hospitalization, and higher incidence of medical complications.


In comparison with other Latin American nations, Argentina used to enjoy a relatively developed economy and a fair distribution of wealth until the early 1980s. During the last decade of the 20th century the economy was re-engineered almost completely to create an open market economy with practically no transition. The country paid a high toll for this change, with the Gross Domestic Product experiencing a sustained decline from 1998, and unemployment rates reaching approximately 25 percent. By the end of 2001 a rapid cascade of political and economic events opened the road to deep social turmoil and economic unrest that spiraled until December 2001, when the country experienced a virtual halt of vital areas of the economy. With two more years of his period still to be completed, the president left office, and so did several others over the following weeks. Less than a month after the world learned about such unusual events, the interim president addressed the Congress to announce that the country would default from all its national and international debts. Bank deposits were seized and thousands of citizens and businesses were left bankrupt while the national currency was devaluated by almost 200% compared to the US dollar. Shortly after the crisis erupted, many found their investments and personal savings reduced by two thirds when measured in hard currency. During the year of 2002, the gross national product declined by more than 11%, and the level of unemployment blast off[1].

Several elegant and landmark epidemiological studies have established a link between trauma produced by war, terrorism, festivities, and mortality [25]. However, there is scarce data on the relationship between cardiac morbidity and mortality and a major economic crisis in the absence of war or natural disasters.

The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events started in 1999 and continued throughout the crisis and the following period, thus giving us a unique opportunity to get a real time picture of the unfolding morbidity and mortality events by means of an multicenter cohort of patients whose clinical characteristics were registered with standardized methods, definitions and selection procedures. We sought to determine whether the financial crisis was associated with cardiac mortality and if medical procedures and therapies were affected by type of institution, public or private.


Full details on the GRACE rationale and methodology have been published [6, 7]. GRACE was designed to reflect an unbiased population of patients with acute coronary syndromes, irrespective of geographic region. Currently, 104 hospitals located in 14 countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States) are participating in this observational study. A broad range of hospitals was chosen based on the availability of differing facilities for care, including presence of on-site cardiac catheterization, number of acute care beds, and type of practice setting, such as teaching/non-teaching, and tertiary versus community hospital. This was done to establish a representative rather than a select sample of patients in the community at large. A standardized data collection form was used to collect information on demographics, symptoms, medical history, clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory data, and in-hospital treatment and outcomes. The data forms were forwarded to the core laboratory (Premier Research, Philadelphia, PA) where, following a review of case records for completeness and face validity, the data were entered by scanning the forms directly into the database. Once entered, the data were sent to the international coordinating center for GRACE (Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, U.S.A.) for analysis.

Study population

For the purposes of this analysis we restricted our study sample to patients enrolled in centers in Argentina between April 1999 and September of 2004, including individuals who had an admission diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ST segment elevation and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina). The seven sites participating in Argentina, were analyzed all together, and also stratified according to their particular profile: Private hospitals (for profit centers, appropriate 24 hours a day interventional facilities, teaching and non-teaching centers), and public hospitals (free of charge services, no interventional facilities available 24 h a day). The period of time examined was divided into the crisis period, which was delimited from April 1999 to December 2002, and the post crisis period, which encompassed the time from January 2003 to September 2004. To define each period we used indicators published by the Census Bureau. We considered the beginning of the negative slope of the gross domestic product curve as the start of the crisis period, which lasted until the domestic product experienced a sustained increase over a full trimester [1].

Clinical endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study was in-hospital all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was non-fatal-myocardial infarction defined by the presence of at least one positive increment of cardiac biochemical marker of necrosis (in case of those in whom myocardial infarction was the index diagnosis) plus chest pain prolonged more than 10 minutes, or new ST-segment deviation seen after the index or qualifying electrocardiogram.

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics are presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between groups were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Odds ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals were computed to evaluate the effects of the crisis on hospital mortality and morbidity. The standard error for the calculation of the 95% confidence intervals for the odds ratios was calculated by means of the Wald formula, and the errors were handled independently for the different time points. Similar analyses were conducted for public and private hospitals separately. All tests were double sided and considered statistically significant at p-value < 0.5. Statistical analyses were conducted with the SAS V. 9.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Study patients and baseline characteristics

Of the 44,991 acute coronary syndrome patients admitted in the global registry, 3220 patients were enrolled in Argentina. The number of patients younger than 65 years old was 1527 (47%), representing the proportion of the population normally expected to be economically active. The remainder 1693 (53%) were older than 65. A final diagnosis of ST-segment-myocardial infarction was made in 1179, and 2041 qualified as unstable angina / non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Female gender represented 30% (n = 1012) of patients. Baseline characteristics comparing patients during and after crisis did not differ significantly (Table 1). The proportion of patients with ST segment deviation on the admission ECG was identical, but the proportion of patients with positive cardiac markers during hospitalization was higher during crisis (54%, n = 1212 v. 48%, n = 472).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics comparing patients during and after crisis.


Crisis median (P 25, P 75)

After Crisis median (P 25, P 75)

p value

Male gender (%)

1542 (69.6)

666 (68.5)


Age (years)

66.1 (56, 75)

65 (56, 74)


Weight (kg)

77 (69, 87)

79 (68, 88)


Height (cm)

168 (161, 174)

170 (162, 174)


Heart rate (b/min)

75 (64, 86)

74 (63, 88)



140 (120, 160)

135 (120, 160)



80 (70, 90)

80 (70, 90)


Creatinine (mg/dl)

1.1 (0.9, 1.3)

1.1 (0.9, 1.3)


Cholesterol (mg/dl)

200 (170, 230)

200 (167, 231)


Values are expressed in median, 25th, and 75th percentiles. The data did not differ significantly from both periods observed. SBP: Systolic blood pressure. DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.

During the crisis, fewer patients underwent diagnostic angiography (23%, n = 500 Vs 26%, n = 249), and related to this a lower proportion was referred to angioplasty (19%, n = 423 Vs 23%, n = 222), with a larger fraction undergoing coronary bypass surgery (5.9%, n = 131 Vs 4.1%, n = 40). We also observed some evidence of lower adherence to interventions of proven efficacy during the crisis, as shown by a lower proportion of patients receiving aspirin (96%, n = 2164 v.98%, n = 950), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (64% n = 1438 Vs 69%, n = 672), and low molecular weight heparin 43%, n = 950 Vs.60%, n = 585) (Figure 1). Despite the fact that serum creatinine levels and clinical profile were similar for each period, we observed a higher incidence of renal failure during the crisis (5.8%, n = 139 Vs 3.4 %, n = 33), which may indicate a less efficient medical management during hospitalization. (Figure 2)
Figure 1

Cath: Catheterization during hospital stay. PCI: Percutaneous coronary interventions. CABG: Coronary artery by pass grafting. β block: Use of beta blockers. Clopidog. : Use of clopidogrel. ACE inh. : Use of angiotensin converting enzime inhibitors. LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin. The overall pattern shows a lower utilization of every intervention and key evidence based medicine during the crisis, which may suggest a poorer quality of care. Asterisks indicate a p value of less than 0.05.
Figure 2

CHF: Congestive heart failure. VT/VF: Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Renal f.: Acute renal failure. The incidence of medical complications was higher during the crisis, in the absence of a higher risk profile at baseline, suggesting an influence by poorer quality of care alone or combined with other factors such as impaired social support or depression. Asterisks denote a p value of less than 0.05.

The incidence of death was higher in the crisis period. (6.2%, n = 139 Vs 5.1%, n = 50), with a crude OR of 1.2 (95% C.I. 0.87, 1.70) (Figure 3). We also observed a consistent trend for a higher incidence of in hospital complications during the crisis, including myocardial infarction {OR 2.504 (95% C.I. 1.663, 3.773)}, congestive heart failure (16% Vs. 11%, p value < 0.01), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (3.4%, n = 75 Vs 2.9%, n = 28). (Figure 2).
Figure 3

Forest plot of the odds ratios form mortality and the related 95% confidence intervals. On visual inspection there is an apparent clear trend for an association between the crisis period and in-hospital cardiac mortality (primary endpoint) and myocardial infarction (secondary endpoint). The association is borderline with statistical significance, with relatively narrow confidence intervals suggesting precise estimates, especially for the overall population and public hospitals (H). The trend seems to be more significant for patients admitted to private hospitals.

In order to explore a potential effect of time dependency over outcomes, we calculated separately the cumulative incidence of mortality for every calendar year. (Figure 4) The highest mortality incidence was 6.1% in 1999, and peaked at 7.4% in 2002, to finally decrease to 6% in 2004. (Figure 4)
Figure 4

Cumulative incidence of death for individual calendar years 1999–2004.

Interventions and outcomes by type of hospital

We observed some indirect data suggestive of a major shift in accessibility to medical care as indicated by the proportion of patients admitted to public hospitals, which in the Argentine GRACE cohort increased from 47% to 60%.

The types and frequency of interventions shared some aspects in common between public and private sites, and was different in several others. During the post crisis period we observed an increase in the proportion of angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions, and also in the proportions treated with aspirin, statins, and low molecular weight heparin (Table 2). Of note, following the crisis the median time delay to percutaneous intervention decreased noticeably in private centers from 50 h (interquartile range 126.5) to 25 h (interquartile range 60.4), and in public sites from 190 h (interquartile range 392) to 27 h (interquartile range 172.1), both p values < 0.01. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in median time to thrombolysis neither for private sites {30 h v. 33 h (interquartile ranges 35 and 80)}, nor for public ones {59 h v. 40 h (interquartile ranges 85 and 65 respectively)}. On the other hand, during the post crisis time we observed a decline in the proportion of patients undergoing coronary by pass surgery, particularly in private sites (Table 2).
Table 2

Hospital Profiles, Diagnosis, procedures and Medications


Private Hospitals

Public Hospitals



After crisis



After crisis


Frequency (%)

Frequency (%)

p value

Frequency (%)

Frequency (%)

p value


411 (35)

150 (39)


443 (42)

175 (30)



771 (65)

237 (61)


621 (58)

412 (70)


Cardiac Catheterization

616 (52)

241 (62)


343 (33)

219 (38)



356 (30)

168 (43)


67 (6.4)

54 (9.2)



115 (9.8)

28 (7.3)


16 (1.5)

12 (2.1)



774 (66)

217 (57)


365 (35)

219 (38)


PA catheter

104 (8.8)

17 (4.4)


29 (2.7)

17 (2.9)


Invasive Respiratory Assistance

139 (12)

30 (7.8)


74 (7.0)

30 (5.2)


In hospital




1137 (96)

379 (98)


1027 (97)

571 (97)


Beta blockers

1049 (89)

358 (93)


928 (87)

524 (89)


ACE inhibitors

740 (63)

265 (69)


698 (66)

407 (69)



429 (37)

205 (53)


114 (11)

58 (10)



462 (39)

216 (56)


269 (26)

309 (53)


Low molecular weight heparins

626 (54)

291 (76)


324 (31)

294 (50)



142 (12)

33 (8.6)


203 (19)

88 (15)


Values are expressed as numbers and proportions.

STEMI: ST-segment myocardial infarction, non-STEMI / UA: non-ST-segment myocardial infarction and Unstable Angina, PCI: percuntaneous coronary intervention; CABG: Coronary artery by-pass grafting; PA: Pulmonary artery catheter

In a similar trend, we found that the vast majority of adverse events detected during the crisis period, such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and death, begun to decrease from January 2003 to September 2004, the period of time when the National Census Bureau detected a recovery of the Gross Domestic Product.

The odds for myocardial infarction were higher during the crisis in private hospitals {OR 2.76 (95% C.I. 1.5, 5.1)} (Figure 3). In a stratified analysis, the OR for mortality during the crisis appeared to be higher for patients admitted to private centers than to public ones {1.85 (95% C.I. 0.9, 3.79) Vs 1.22 (95% C.I. 0.83, 1.79)}(Figure 3).


Statement of principal findings

Our study provides some evidence that there may be an association between the financial and institutional collapse of Argentina and increased in-hospital cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The link between extraordinary circumstances and increased cardiac mortality has been previously reported. A significant increase in the number of cardiac deaths was observed on the same day of major earthquakes that affected Los Angeles and Athens [8, 9]. Also, the socio-economic difficulties experienced by Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union have been associated with a marked decrease in the crude life expectancy both for males and females [10]. Albeit, no specific information on cardiac mortality rates due to coronary artery disease in Russia is available for that specific period.

Strengths of the study

The Argentine case is unique in that a major socio-economic collapse occurred in the absence of any natural disaster or war. GRACE provides a useful tool to assess in a standardized, structured manner, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches performed in a representative cluster of hospitals throughout the crisis and following it. Our observations are intriguing, and pose questions on the mechanisms underlying the increased odds of mortality during the crisis compared to the post crisis period. We analyzed several mechanisms that may be responsible for the worsened outcomes during the crisis period: Differences in baseline clinical risk, in medical interventions, type of hospital, social and psychological factors, bias and chance.

Baseline clinical risk

We did not observe any significant differences between the crisis and post-crisis period regarding the main demographic characteristics such as age, gender, prior coronary artery disease, co morbidities and Killip class on admission. The overall clinical profile is similar to other cohorts elsewhere for the same period [6].

Differences in medical interventions

We anticipated an association between the crisis and access to medical care because of a direct effect on access to technology and imported medical supplies. Our observations provide some evidence to support the presumption that the crisis may have affected the quality of care. On one hand, patients enrolled in the registry were consistently treated according with the guidelines and in a similar manner compared to other regions [11]. The proportion of patients receiving aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins increased progressively over the years and no relevant alterations were observed in the crisis period. Further, the proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions or by pass surgery followed the international trends and guidelines which appeared between periods [12, 13]. On the other hand, time to invasive interventions was several fold longer during the crisis both for public and private hospitals. This may reflect a limited supply of tools that were by most produced outside the country and priced in hard currency. Also, as shown in figure 1, the proportion of patients treated with relatively expensive medications such as low molecular weight heparin and statins was significantly lower during the crisis. We also found a higher proportion of congestive heart failure during the crisis period. It could be speculated that this was related to a lower quality of care as reflected by time delay to invasive procedures as stated before, but it could also be the consequence of other factors not measured by our study. Such factors may to some extent be responsible for the inter-regional variations in outcomes of populations that appear to be otherwise similar [1416].

Type of institution

Another factor that could have influenced the outcomes is an increased burden of medical care on the public system. The Argentine economic phenomenon has been called a "middle class crisis", namely of those who would normally gain access to health insurance through employment or, for small business owners and entrepreneurs, as an out of pocket expenditure. Approximately 20 million people out of a total country population of 37 million are no longer covered by neither the private sector nor a union-run mandatory health insurance, which represents a huge overload for the network of public hospitals [17]. Public hospitals in Argentina suffer form chronic shortage of funding, inadequate distribution of staffing, and have limited capabilities to provide high tech, round the clock care, as reflected by the relatively low proportion of patients undergoing invasive procedures and revascularization. The sudden increase in the demand of medical services posed by the abrupt transfer of thousands of patients from the private system was not accompanied a proportional increase in budget or staff, thus making it likely that the services provided were insufficient [16].

Social support and psychological factors

The association between the crisis period and increased in-hospital cardiac mortality could be explained by alterations in socio-economic factors or social support, both variables that were not directly measured by the registry. Socio-economic status has been used as a surrogate marker of a much complex matrix called social support. Several studies have suggested that a meaningful impairment in the quality and width of social support can be associated with higher mortality rates, both from cardiac and non cardiac causes [18, 19]. It is possible that the enormous stress produced by the loss of savings, investments, and jobs yielded a proportional increase in psychological stress and sense of lack of social support, with dire consequences for the outcome of acute coronary events. It is also likely that several social covariables interacted at the same time to yield an effect on outcomes.

Time dependency

It may be argued that our observations may be due solely to the availability of better treatment modalities over time. As shown in figure 3, this appears not to be the case. The crude cumulative incidence of death was 6.1% in 1999, then increased to 7.2% in 2001; 7.4% in 2004 and then decreased to 6% in 2004. Although we can't rule out completely the influence of new guidelines and better therapeutic options over time, the breakout analysis of annual mortality seems to support our main findings.


Our analysis is exposed to a potential source of selection bias by the definition of each time period. In the absence of a major natural disaster, disease outbreak or war, it can be argued on the accuracy on our definitions on when the crisis started and when it ended. For that matter, we considered data published by the Census Bureau regarding the National Gross Domestic Product and industrial indicators and unemployment rates, and selected the nadir of the adjusted Gross Domestic Product curve as the onset of the crisis, and the first trimester that showed a sustained increase in the Gross Domestic Product as the arbitrary end of the financial crisis. This is subject to bias in itself and alternative definitions may have yielded different results. Nevertheless, we feel confident in that our definitions are solid and based on hard economic indicators instead of political signs or personal interpretations that are vulnerable to subjective perceptions. There is a consistent match between the evolution of the gross domestic product and other indicators such as the investment indexes, public works and private investments in real estate and construction [1].

Another limitation to our conclusions is that GRACE was not specifically designed to provide information on socio economic status or social support, which would be alternative exposures of interest in the scenario of a deep financial crisis. We considered the broad term "crisis" as the exposure of interest, so we must acknowledge that the mechanisms responsible for our observations are to some extent speculative. Also, the study was not powered to detect strength of association between exposures and mortality for a specific region or country.

Even in the absence of a formal level of statistical significance, the odds ratios appear to consistently point in thee direction of worse outcomes during the crisis. (Figure 3)


This study provides evidence suggestive of an association between a dramatic socio-economic event and increased cardiac mortality. The spike in mortality rates that we observed was striking and above the expected death rates according to prior projections from the Ministry of Health [20, 21]. We observed a consistent trend to worse outcomes during hospitalization, thus indicating an association between the financial crisis and cardiac morbidity and mortality.


Authors’ Affiliations

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Institute, Favaloro Foundation
Instituto Argentino de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento
Center for Outcomes Research, The University of Massachusetts Medical School


  1. Retrieved from The National Institute of Statistics and Census (INDEC) Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos January 1st 2005 []
  2. Spiegel PB, Salama P: War and mortality in Kosovo, 1998–99: An epidemiological testimony Doctors and torture. Lancet 2000, 355: 2204-2209. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02404-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Oosterhoff P, Zwanikken P, Ketting E: Sexual torture of men in Croatia and other conflict situations: an open secret. Reprod Health Matters 2004, 23: 68-77. 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23115-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Phillips DP, Jarvinen JR, Abramson IS, Phillips RR: Cardiac Mortality is higher around Christmas and New Year's than at any other time. The Holidays as a Risk Factor for Death. Circulation 2004, 110: 3781-3788. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151424.02045.F7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldberg RJ, Spencer F, Leesard D, Yarzebsky J, Lareau C, Gore JM: Occurrence of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Worcester Massachussets Before, During, and After the Terrorists Attacks in New York City and Washington, DC, on September 11 2001. Am J Cardiol 2005, 95: 258-260. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. The GRACE Investigators: Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2001, 141: 190-199. 10.1067/mhj.2001.112404View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KA, Eagle KA, Flather MD, et al.: Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol 2002, 90: 358-363. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02489-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Myers R, Dewar HA: Circumstances surrounding sudden deaths from coronary artery disease with coroner's necropsies. Br Heart J 1975, 37: 1133-1143.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Muller JE, Abela GS, Nesto RW, Tofler GHl: Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerable plaques: The lexicon of a new frontier. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 23: 809-813.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. WHO World Health Report 2000[]
  11. Eagle KA, Kline-Rogers E, Goodman SG, Gurfinkel E, Avezum A, Flather MD, et al.: Adherence to evidence-based therapies after discharge for acute coronary syndromes. An ongoing, prospective, observational study. Am J Med 2004, 117: 73-81. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.041View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka ZF, et al.: 1999 update. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 34: 890-911. 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00351-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction – Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) Circulation 2004, 110: 588-636. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA
  14. Inhibition of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb /IIIa With Eptifibatide in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 1998, 339: 436-443. 10.1056/NEJM199808133390704
  15. Giugliano RP, Llevadot J, Wilcox RG, Gurfinkel E, McCabe CH, Charlesworth A, et al.: Geographic variation in patient and hospital characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis. Results from InTIME-II. Eur Heart J 2001, 22: 1702-1715. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2583View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurfinkel E, Bozovich G, Mautner B: Inter regional differences in TIMI 11B trial. Heart 2003, 89: 1083-1084. 10.1136/heart.89.9.1083PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Katz I: Argentina Hospital. In Buenos Aires. 1st edition. Edhasa, Buenos Aires; 2004.Google Scholar
  18. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz R: Emotional support and survival after myocardial infaction: A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1992, 117: 1003-1009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Berkman LF, Glass T: Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In Social Epidemiology. Edited by: Berkman LF, Kawachi I. NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:242-266.Google Scholar
  20. Argentina 2003-Indicadores Basicos. Statistical Chart. Buenos Aires, Ministery of Health Statistical Department 2003.
  21. Gurfinkel E, Ameriso S, Belardi J, Bono J, Bosch X, Capelli H, et al.: National Consensus on Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Anti Flu Vaccination. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004, 4(suppl G):35G-41G.Google Scholar


© Gurfinkel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.