Skip to main content

Table 1 Tabulation of patient demographics, baseline characteristics, PICC-related and distant DVT/VTE incidences

From: The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients

Characteristic

All patients

(n = 490)

PICC-related DVT

(n = 27)

Distant VTE

(n = 26)

Age (Mean)

62.4

63.0

67.9

Gender

 Male

217 (44.3%)

13 (5.9%)

21 (9.7%)

 Female

273 (55.7%)

14 (5.1%)

5 (1.8%)

Primary cancer

 Colorectal

247 (50.4%)

19 (7.6%)

22 (8.9%)

 Breast

89 (18.2%)

6 (6.7%)

1 (1.1%)

 Pancreas

39 (8%)

2 (5.1%)

1 (2.6%)

 Other

115 (23.4%)

0

2 (1.7%)

Treatment intention

 Adjuvant

194 (39.6%)

16 (8.2%)

15 (7.7%)

 Palliative

258 (52.7%)

11 (4.2%)

10 (3.9%)

 Neo Adjuvant /Radicala

28 (5.5%)

0

0

 Supportiveb

10 (2.2%)

0

1 (10%)

Catheter insertion

 More than one insertion attempt

126 (25.7%)

11 (8.7%)

4 (3.1%)

 Catheter repositioning

241 (49.2%)

15 (6.2%)

13 (5.4%)

 Current anticoagulation

42 (8.6%)

3 (7.1%)

1 (2.4%)

  1. DVT deep vein thrombosis, PICC peripherally inserted central catheter, VTE vascular thromboembolism
  2. One patient had both PICC related DVT and distant VTE (PE)
  3. aNeo adjuvant/Radical – Treatment with curative intent
  4. bSupportive – intravenous fluids or total parenteral nutrition