Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the imaging studies

From: Incidence of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Study design

Country

Population

Type of Imaging

Total imaging performed

Anticoagulant prophylaxis

Indication for imaging

CUS screening

Bompard [36]

Retrospective cohort

France

All underwent CTPA

CTPA

135

PE: 32

No PE: 103

Yes

Clinical suspicion

NR

Chen [37]

Retrospective cohort

China

Inpatients underwent CTPA

CTPA

25

PE: 10

No PE: 15

NR

Clinical suspicion

No

Franco-Lopez [38]

Retrospective cohort

Spain

Inpatients underwent CTPA

Angio CTs

18

NR

Increase in D-Dimer

No

Grillet [39]

Retrospective cohort

France

Inpatients underwent CTPA

CT scan

All 100

PE: 23

No PE: 77

NR

All severe cases

No

Leonard-Lorant [40]

Retrospective cohort

France

All underwent CT

CTPA

106

PE: 32

No PE: 74

Yes, 46%

Clinical suspicion 63%

Others 37%

No

Poyiadji [41]

Retrospective cohort

USA

All underwent CTPA

CTPA

328

PE:72

No PE: 256

Yes, partial

NR

NR

Marone [43]

Retrospective cohort

Italy

Inpatients underwent CUS

Non-ICU

CUS

30

No

Clinical suspicion

Clinical suspicion

Cattaneo [42]

Retrospective cohort

Italy

Inpatients underwent CUS

Non-ICU

CUS

64

Yes

Screening

Yes, asymptomatic

  1. NR Not reported, ICU Intensive care unit, VTE Venous thromboembolism, PE Pulmonary embolism, DVT Deep vein thrombosis, CTPA Computed tomography pulmonary angiography, CUS Compression ultrasonography