Skip to main content

Table 2 Accuracy of D-dimer interpretation strategies for VTE

From: Adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation: results from the SLICE trial

Parameter

Conventional strategy

Age-adjusted strategy

Wells-adjusted strategy

YEARS-adjusted strategy

Negative results

 n/N

182/368

233/368

237/368

368

 % (95% CI)

49.5 (44.2-54.7)

63.3 (58.2-68.3)

64.4 (59.3-69.3)

71.5 (66.6-76.0)

Sensitivity

 n/N

16/17

13/17

11/17

10/17

 % (95% CI)

94.1 (71.3-99.9)

76.5 (50.1-93.2)

64.7 (38.3-85.8)

58.8 (32.9-81.6)

Specificity

 n/N

181/351

229/351

231/351

256/351

 % (95% CI)

51.6 (46.2-56.9)

65.2 (60.0-70.2)

65.8 (60.6-70.8)

72.9 (68.0-77.5)

Negative predictive value

 n/N

181/182

229/233

231/237

256/263

 % (95% CI)

99.5 (97.0-100)

98.3 (95.7-99.5)

97.5 (94.6-99.1)

97.3 (94.6-98.9)

 Negative likelihood ratio

0.11

0.36

0.54

0.56

 % (95% CI)

1.66-2.29

0.15-0.85

0.28-1.03

0.32-1.00

 Positive likelihood ratio

1.95

2.20

1.89

2.17

 % (95% CI)

0.02-0.76

1.63-2.97

1.29-2.77

1.41-3.35

  1. Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval