Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of findings table

From: Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients treated with heparin or direct thrombin inhibitors during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research topic: Direct thrombin inhibitors compared with heparin for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy

Patients: Adult and pediatric patients

Setting: In-hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy

Intervention: Direct thrombin inhibitors

Comparison: Unfractionated heparin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risksb (95% CI)

Relative effect

(95% CI)

No of Participants

(studies)

Quality of the evidence

(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed riska

Corresponding risk

unfractionated heparin

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Mortality

474 per 1000

393 per 1000

(346 to 450)

RR 0.83 (0.73 to 0.95)

1777

(17)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

publication bias

 

Major bleeding events

501 per 1000

336 per 1000

(251 to 456)

RR 0.67 (0.5 to 0.91)

1355

(16)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

publication bias

 

Minor bleeding events

287 per 1000

247 per 1000

(195 to 316)

RR 0.86 (0.68 to 1.10)

632

(8)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

imprecision

 

Pump-related thrombosis

233 per 1000

163 per 1000

(121 to 217)

RR 0.7 (0.52 to 0.93)

1361

(13)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

imprecision, publication bias

 

Patient-related thrombosis

200 per 1000

162 per 1000

(118 to 220)

RR 0.81 (0.59 to 1.10)

1447

(15)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

inconsistency, publication bias

 

length of ECMO therapy

(hours and days)

See comment

The SMD in length of ECMO therapy in the intervention groups was 0.12 higher (-0.03 lower to 0.27 higher)

 

1274

(12)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

imprecision, publication bias

Mean for control group not estimable as different measures were used

for outcome assessment

length of hospital stay

(days)

The mean time to anticoagulation goal

ranged across control groups from

5 to 47 days

The SMD in length of hospital stay

in the intervention groups was 0.19 higher (-0.30 lower to 0.69 higher)

 

467

(4)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

imprecision, publication bias

 

time to anticoagulation goal

(hours)

The mean time to anticoagulation goal

ranged across control groups from

9 to 32 h

The SMD in time to anticoagulation goal in the intervention groups was 0.2 lower (-0.73 lower to 0.34 higher)

 

324

(4)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

imprecision, publication bias

 

Percentage of time within therapeutic range

(percentage)

The mean percentage of time within therapeutic range

ranged across control groups from

11 to 31 percent

The SMD of percentage of time within therapeutic range in the intervention groups was 0.54 higher (0.14 to 0.94 higher)

 

491

(5)

      

very low

due to lack of RCTs, risk of bias,

publication bias

 
  1. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
  2. High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
  3. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
  4. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
  5. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate
  6. CI Confidence interval, RR Risk Ratio, SMD Standardized mean difference, RCTs randomized controlled trials
  7. aControl group risk estimates come from pooled estimates of control groups
  8. bThe basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)