Skip to main content

Table 3 Treatments for different prophylaxis groups during thromboprophylaxis

From: Modern thromboprophylaxis protocol based on guidelines applied in a respiratory intensive care unit: a single-center prospective cohort study

 

Overall (N = 884)

Mechanical prophylaxis group (N = 93)

Pharmacological prophylaxis group (N = 387)

Pharmacological combined mechanical prophylaxis group (N = 404)

P value

CRRT, n (%)

181 (20.5)

7 (7.5)

67 (17.3)

107 (26.5)

< 0.001¶

ECMO, n (%)

112 (12.7)

6 (6.5)

47 (12.1)

59 (14.6)

0.095

Intravascular tube, n (%)

619 (70.0)

60 (64.5)

211 (54.5)

348 (86.1)*

< 0.001

Deep vein catheterization, n (%)

253 (28.6)

21 (22.6)

103 (26.6)

129 (31.9)

0.101

PICC, n (%)

23 (2.6)

5 (5.4)

9 (2.3)

9 (2.2)

0.219

Artery cannulation, n (%)

572 (64.7)

52 (55.9)

183 (47.3)

337 (83.4)*

< 0.001

Swan-Ganz catheter, n (%)

31 (3.5)

1 (1.1)

13 (3.4)

17 (4.2)

0.359

Invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%)

615 (69.6)

57 (61.3)

231 (59.7)

327 (80.9)*

< 0.001

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%)

367 (41.5)

30 (32.3)†

176 (45.5)†

161 (39.9)

0.044

Artificial airway, n (%)

609 (68.9)

57 (61.3)

228 (58.9)

324 (80.2)*

< 0.001

Intubation of the trachea, n (%)

573 (64.8)

54 (58.1)

217 (56.1)

302 (74.8)*

< 0.001

Tracheotomy, n (%)

178 (20.1)

11 (11.8)

51 (13.2)

116 (28.7)*

< 0.001

Blood component transfusion, n (%)

345 (39.0)

49 (52.7)

118 (30.5)*

178 (44.1)

< 0.001

  1. *P value for difference between this group and the other two groups were less than 0.0167
  2. †P value for difference between mechanical prophylaxis group and the pharmacological prophylaxis group was less than 0.0167
  3. ¶P value for difference between any two groups was less than 0.0167
  4. CRRT continuous renal replacement treatment, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PICC peripherally inserted central catheter