Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison and suitability of laboratory assays for monitoring novel oral anticoagulants [[89],[90]]

From: Rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants: pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, specific patient populations and relevance of coagulation monitoring

Agent

PT

Dilute PT

aPTT

ECT

HepTest

PiCT

Chromogenic assays

Preferred assay

Assays that may be used in the absence of preferred assay

Rivaroxaban

Dose-dependent prolongation but results vary with thromboplastin reagent

Results vary as for PT

Not as sensitive as PT

NA

Dose-dependent response with short incubation time

Sensitive if incubation avoided and human Factor Xa used

Dose-dependent response with human Factor Xa and buffer

Factor Xa chromogenic assay (with appropriate calibration)

PT (Neoplastin)

Apixaban

Prolongs PT but results may vary with thromboplastin reagent

More sensitive than PT

Other tests may be more sensitive

NA

Dose-dependent response and more sensitive than PT, dilute PT and aPTT

NR

Dose-dependent response

Rotachrom® Factor Xa chromogenic assay (with appropriate calibration)

Modified PT

Dabigatran

Prolongs PT but insensitive and results may vary with thromboplastin reagent

NR

More sensitive than PT but results vary with different reagents

Prolongs ECT in a dose-dependent manner

Prolongs HepTest but may be unsuitable

Prolongs PiCT but insensitive at lower doses

In development

Hemoclot suggested

ECT, aPTT

  1. aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time, ECT ecarin clotting time, NA not applicable, NR not reported, PiCT prothrombinase-induced clotting time, PT prothrombin time.