Open Access

A hypothesis-generating study to evaluate platelet activity in diabetics with chronic kidney disease

  • Donald F Brophy1, 2Email author,
  • rika J Martin2, 3,
  • Todd WB Gehr2 and
  • Marcus E CarrJr2, 3, 4
Thrombosis Journal20053:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-3-3

Received: 10 January 2005

Accepted: 29 March 2005

Published: 29 March 2005

Abstract

Background

It is well described that diabetes mellitus is a hypercoagulable state. It is also known that patients with renal dysfunction have impaired platelet aggregation and function. It is not well described how renal dysfunction affects the hypercoagulability associated with diabetes. This post-hoc sub-group analysis compares platelet function, clot structure and thrombin generation time at baseline, and following enoxaparin exposure in three groups of subjects.

Methods

30 total subjects were evaluated in the three groups: Group I: normal controls (n = 10), Group II: subjects with renal dysfunction but without diabetes (n = 13), and Group III: subjects with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction (n = 7). For each subject, platelet contractile force (PCF), clot elastic modulus (CEM) and thrombin generation time (TGT) were simultaneously measured in whole blood at baseline, and following increasing enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity exposure. The group means for each parameter were determined and compared using one-way analysis of variance, with post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test.

Results

At baseline, subjects in Group III (diabetics with concomitant renal dysfunction) display significantly enhanced platelet activity, as measured by PCF (p = 0.003) and CEM (p = 0.03), relative to the non-diabetic Groups I and II. Subjects in Group II (renal dysfunction without diabetes) had significantly prolonged TGT values relative to controls when the antifactor Xa activity concentration reached 0.5 (p = 0.007), 1.0 (p = 0.005) and 3.0 IU/mL (p < 0.0001), respectively. There were no differences between Group II and Group III with respect to TGT at these antifactor Xa activity concentrations. When the antifactor Xa activity concentration reached 3.0 IU/mL, Groups II and III formed significantly less rigid blood clots (CEM p = 0.003) and also trended toward reduced PCF (p = 0.06) relative to Group I.

Conclusion

This hypothesis-generating sub-group analysis suggests that at baseline, patients with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction have significantly enhanced platelet activity (PCF), and form more rigid blood clots (CEM) compared to controls and subjects with renal dysfunction but no diabetes. This may suggest that the presence of renal dysfunction does not ameliorate the hypercoagulable state associated with diabetes. Secondly, it appears that subjects with renal dysfunction but without diabetes have an enhanced response to enoxaparin relative to controls.

Keywords

diabetes thrombin generation platelet function renal dysfunction

Diabetes mellitus is a hypercoagulable state [1]. It has been demonstrated that patients with diabetes have abnormally elevated markers of coagulation activation [212], as well as increased risk of mortality from thrombosis [13]. Indeed, virtually all Type II diabetics will die a thrombotic death, whether its origin be cardiac, cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular [14].

What is less clear is how the presence of renal dysfunction affects the hypercoagulable state associated with diabetes. This is an important question; given the fact that renal dysfunction is so prevalent in patients with diabetes [15]. There is clinical and laboratory evidence that uremia associated with renal dysfunction leads to platelet dysfunction and altered hemostasis. [1620]. However, we are unaware of any reports that suggest thrombotic risk decreases in diabetics who develop renal dysfunction.

Our laboratory has developed a novel whole blood monitoring assay that determines thrombin generation, platelet function and clot structure on a single sample of patient blood. This assay provides a global assessment of clotting function by reporting the markers platelet contractile force (PCF), clot elastic modulus (CEM) and the onset of thrombin generation as measured by thrombin generation time (TGT). PCF is the force produced by platelets during clot retraction, and is a novel measure of platelet function during clotting; CEM reflects the structural integrity of the blood clot; and TGT is the speed at which thrombin is produced in whole blood [21]. Changes in these parameters provide a detailed characterization of the hemostatic effect of various disease states [22, 23], antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs [21, 24, 25], and hemostatic agents [26] on platelet function and thrombin generation.

We report here findings of a hypothesis-generating sub-group analysis that illustrate the effects of diabetes and renal dysfunction on platelet function and thrombin generation time. In addition, we examined the potential impacts of these disease states on the response to the commonly used low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin.

Patients and Methods

This was a hypothesis-generating sub-group analysis of a prospective, open-label, ex vivo study of enoxaparin in patients with and without renal dysfunction [27]. The Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Institutional Review Board approved this study prior to subject enrollment, and this study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. In this study, a total of 30 subjects were evaluated: 10 healthy controls; 13 subjects with renal dysfunction but without diabetes; and seven patients with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction (6 CKD and 1 ESRD).

All subjects were anticoagulant naïve, non-thrombosed, and otherwise healthy. Subjects were admitted into this study if they were > 18 years of age and provided written informed consent. In addition, subjects with ESRD must have received maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months through an arterio-venous fistula or graft. Subjects were excluded from this investigation if they had any of the following: active bleeding or thrombotic disorder; pregnancy; recent trauma or surgery (< 7 days); cirrhosis or other liver abnormality; hematocrit < 30%; active cancer; had received a blood transfusion within 1 week of study enrollment; thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100,000/mL); documented history of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency; concurrent use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug therapy. All subjects who provided written informed consent and who met the above criteria underwent screening evaluation, which consisted of a routine physical exam and laboratory evaluation (basic metabolic panel, complete blood count (CBC), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT)).

Study Procedures

For each subject, blood was collected via aseptic venipuncture into four evacuated tubes containing 3.2% sodium citrate. The blood was pooled and then aliquotted into five separate samples, which were spiked with increasing enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity concentrations. Final enoxaparin antifactor Xa concentrations in the respective aliquots were 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, and 3.0 IU/mL. For each aliquotted blood sample, analysis was performed to determine the corresponding TGT, PCF and CEM at each antifactor Xa activity concentration.

Specimen Processing and Analysis

Baseline chemistries (basic metabolic profile, CBC, PT, aPTT, INR) and antifactor Xa concentrations were processed and analyzed at the VCU Health System Department of Pathology. Plasma enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity was measured using a validated, commercially available chromogenic method (STA® heparin colorimetric analyzer, Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ, USA), and the results expressed as IU/mL. The lower limit of antifactor Xa detection for this assay was 0.05 IU/mL; the coefficient of variation (CV) was ± 3%. Whole blood samples were analyzed for TGT, PCF and CEM at the VCU Coagulation Special Studies Laboratory. The TGT, PCF and CEM for each aliquotted whole blood sample were simultaneously measured using the Hemodyne Hemostasis Analysis System™ (Hemodyne, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA) using a previously published, validated method [27]. All samples were run in duplicate. The CV for this assay was ± 7%.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using JMP statistical software version 5.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The data were presented based on subject group assignment, as Group I: Control; Group II: subjects with renal dysfunction but without diabetes; and Group III: subjects with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction. Descriptive statistics characterized the group demographic data One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed for intergroup differences in demographic data, and mean PCF, CEM and TGT at baseline and at each spiked enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity concentration for each of the three groups. If intergroup differences were found to be statistically significant, a post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test was used to differentiate which groups were statistically different. The level of significance for all statistical tests was p < 0.05.

Results

Thirty subjects completed this study as described above. There were no adverse reactions or dropouts from the study. Table 1 details the subject demographics. Other than differences in the racial makeup of the groups, the groups were similar with respect to age, sex, weight and presence of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Table 1

Baseline Subject Demographics

 

Group I

Group II

Group III

 

Parameter

Controls (n = 10)

Renal Dysfunction (n = 13)

Diabetes and Renal Dysfunction (n = 7)

P-value

Age [mean (S.D.)]

40.5 (9.6)

46.5 (15.0)

45.1 (11.1)

NS

Race [number (%)]

    

Caucasian

5 (50)

1 (8)

0

 

Black

3 (30)

12 (92)

6 (86)

0.02§

Other

2 (20)

0

1 (14)

 

Sex [number (%)]

    

Male

5 (50)

7 (54)

3 (43)

NS

Female

5 (50)

6 (46)

4 (57)

 

Weight

    

[mean kg (S.D.)]

75.0 (13.4)

83.9 (23.1)

86.0 (25.0)

NS

CAD [number (%)]

    

Yes

1 (10)

2 (15)

3 (43)

NS

No

9 (90)

11 (85)

4 (57)

 

NS – Not significant

§ Chi-square test for group homogeneity significantly different

Baseline Platelet Function, Clot Structure and Thrombin Generation Time

The top panel of Table 2 details the baseline PCF, CEM and TGT in Groups I, II and III. Group III (concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction) exhibited significantly greater platelet activity, as measured by PCF (p = 0.003) and CEM (p = 0.03), relative to the non-diabetic groups I and II. The reported TGT was not significantly different between groups at baseline.
Table 2

Mean (S.D.) Platelet Contractile Force, Clot Elastic Modulus and Thrombin Generation Time at Baseline and Following Increasing Enoxaparin Antifactor Xa Activity

 

Group I

Group II

Group III

 

Antifactor Xa Activity

Controls (n = 10)

Renal Dysfunction (n = 13)

Diabetes and Renal Dysfunction (n = 7)

P-value

Baseline

    

PCF

8.5 (1.4)

9.8 (1.5)

12.0 (2.9)*

0.003

CEM

23.2 (5.4)

29.0 (9.5)

37.3 (15.5)*

0.03

TGT§

222.0 (60.3)

235.4 (53.2)

270.0 (52.0)

NS

0.25 IU/mL

    

PCF

7.0 (1.8)

7.5 (1.6)

8.8 (2.9)

NS

CEM

21.1 (4.1)

22.6 (4.1)

24.6 (7.1)

NS

TGT

273.0 (68.5)

327.7 (70.8)

325.7 (76.3)

NS

0.50 IU/mL

    

PCF

5.5 (1.9)

5.6 (1.8)

6.3 (2.4)

NS

CEM

17.2 (5.1)

19.1 (4.4)

19.4 (5.0)

NS

TGT

318.0 (68.1)

440.0 (97.5)*

420.0 (86.6)

0.007

1.0 IU/mL

    

PCF

3.6 (1.7)

3.0 (1.7)

4.0 (2.1)

NS

CEM

11.9 (4.5)

10.0 (4.6)

12.9 (6.1)

NS

TGT

423.0 (128.4)

588.5 (96.0)*

552.9 (114.7)

0.005

3.0 IU/mL

    

PCF

1.5 (1.3)

0.6 (0.2)

1.0 (0.9)

0.06

CEM

4.8 (4.4)*

0.8 (0.8)

0.9 (0.8)

0.003

TGT

780.0 (317.5)

1200.0 (0)*

1200.0 (0)*

< 0.0001

PCF – Kdynes, CEM – Kdynes/cm2,§TGT – seconds

NS – not significant

* Statistically significant

Comparative Platelet Function, Clot Structure and Thrombin Generation Times Following Increasing Enoxaparin Antifactor Xa Activity Concentrations

As the spiked ex vivo enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity concentration increased, there were corresponding changes in PCF, CEM and TGT (Table 2). As expected, there was an inverse relationship between increasing enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity and platelet function (i.e., PCF) and clot structure (i.e., CEM) in all three groups. Conversely, there was a direct relationship between TGT prolongation and increasing enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity in the groups.

The PCF and CEM were not statistically different between groups at antifactor Xa activity concentrations of 0.25, 0.5 or 1.0 IU/mL. However, when the antifactor Xa activity concentration reached 3.0 IU/mL, Group I (controls) had significantly higher CEM (p = 0.003) relative to the two groups with renal dysfunction. There was also a trend of greater PCF in Group I relative to the other groups.

The TGT was significantly prolonged in Group II (renal dysfunction without diabetes) relative to Group I (controls) at enoxaparin antifactor Xa activity concentrations of 0.5 (p = 0.07), 1.0 (p = 0.005) and 3.0 IU/mL (p < 0.0001), respectively. There were no statistical differences between Groups II and III (concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction) at these antifactor Xa activity concentrations.

Discussion

This was a hypothesis-generating sub-group analysis performed to assess the pro-coagulant effect of diabetes on the platelet function in patients with CKD. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that at baseline, diabetic patients with renal dysfunction have elevated platelet activity. Our review of the literature fails to identify prior studies of platelet function specifically performed in diabetics with renal dysfunction. Given the apparently divergent effects of hyperglycemia and uremia on platelet function, one might hypothesize that depressed platelet function due to uremia may be partially or completely reversed by the enhanced effects of diabetes. At baseline, this appears to be the case. The presence of diabetes increases platelet forces, vis-à-vis PCF and results in greater clot strength, vis-à-vis CEM, compared to the other non-diabetic groups I and II. However, despite the increased platelet activity in diabetics with renal dysfunction noted at baseline, there were no differences in TGT between groups.

Previous studies of platelet function in diabetes or uremia have primarily involved measurement of platelet aggregation. Enhanced platelet aggregation has been demonstrated with diabetes [3, 29, 30] and decreased platelet aggregation has been identified in uremia [3135]. Previous studies of PCF noted enhanced function in diabetes [23], but normal values in chronic uremia [36]. These studies are consistent with the current findings. The divergence between aggregation results and PCF findings centers around the fact that one assay (platelet aggregation) is performed with minimal platelet activation and the other (PCF) under conditions of maximal platelet activation (i.e., platelets in the presence of thrombin). Thrombin is such a profound agonist of platelet function that subtle influences noted by platelet aggregation studies are simply overwhelmed. An example of this effect can be seen with the effects of IIb/IIIa blockade on platelet aggregation and PCF. The concentrations of IIb/IIIa blocking agents (e.g., abciximab, tirofiban) required to block PCF production are an order of magnitude higher than those required to suppress platelet aggregation [24].

The data from this analysis, although limited by the relatively small sample size, suggests that there is a "counter-balancing" effect of renal dysfunction and diabetes with respect to platelet function and thrombin generation time. This is borne out in Table 2. For example, subjects in Group II (renal dysfunction but without diabetes) have the greatest prolongations in TGT, compared to the other groups, following increasing antifactor Xa activity. However, Group III (renal dysfunction with diabetes) subjects tend to have a blunted TGT prolongation, though not significantly different compared to Group II. One could argue that given a larger sample size, potential differences may be detected between Groups II and III. Our findings should at least caution against assuming the presence of an "auto" anticoagulant or "auto" antiplatelet effect of uremia in patients with concomitant diabetes.

There are important limitations to these findings. First, this study was a sub-group analysis not designed a priori to detect these differences. Indeed, these differences were detected on data analysis and thought to be important hypothesis-generating data. Secondly, the groups presented were quite heterogeneous, both in terms of numbers and underlying disease states. That is, there were control patients with neither diabetes nor renal dysfunction, there were patients with solely renal dysfunction but no diabetes, and there were patients with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction. A more appropriate way to study the effects of diabetes and renal dysfunction on platelet activity and thrombin generation time is prospectively using four study groups: 1) non-diabetics without CKD; 2) non-diabetics with CKD; 3) diabetics without CKD; and 4) diabetics with CKD. This study design would more appropriately describe the effect of diabetes on uremic platelets. Moreover, this would allow for greater statistically analysis using a two-way ANOVA test, that could detect an interaction between the concomitant disease states on altered platelet function. Nevertheless, these data are compelling enough to develop a hypothesis for further study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we report hypothesis-generating findings that suggest that at baseline subjects with concomitant diabetes and renal dysfunction have increased platelet activity relative to healthy controls and patients with renal dysfunction but no concomitant diabetes. This may suggest that the presence of uremia does not completely ameliorate the hypercoagulable effect of diabetes. Secondly, it appears that subjects with renal dysfunction but without concomitant diabetes have an enhanced response to enoxaparin compared to the controls, as measured by TGT. Further large-scale studies are warranted to further characterize the effects and interactions of diabetes and renal dysfunction on platelet function.

Abbreviations

PCF: 

platelet contractile force

CEM: 

clot elastic modulus, TGT, thrombin generation time, CKD, chronic kidney disease

ESRD: 

end-stage renal disease

GFR: 

glomerular filtration rate

VCU: 

Virginia Commonwealth University

LMWH: 

low-molecular weight heparin

CBC: 

complete blood count

INR: 

international normalized ratio

aPTT: 

activated partial thromboplastin time

PT: 

prothrombin time, CAD, coronary artery disease

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by National Kidney Foundation of the Virginias Grant #NKFVA018.

Presented in abstract form at the 2nd International Congress on Clinical Pharmacy, Paris, France, April 28, 2004.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia Campus (VCU/MCV)
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, VCU/MCV
(3)
Coagulation Special Studies Laboratory, VCU/MCV
(4)
Department of Pathology, VCU/MCV

References

  1. Carr ME: Diabetes mellitus: A hypercoagulable state. J Diabetes Complications 2001, 15: 44-54. 10.1016/S1056-8727(00)00132-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ishii M, Kameyama M, Inokuchi T, Isogai S: Plasma fibrinopeptide A levels during insulin-induced plasma glucose falls in diabetics. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1987, 4: 45-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rosove MH, Frank HJ, Harwig SS: Plasma beta-thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4, fibrinopeptide A, and other hemostatic functions during improved, short-term glycemic control in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1984, 7: 174-79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Small M, Douglas JT, Lowe GD, MacCuish AC, Forbes CD: Effect of insulin therapy on coagulation and platelet function in type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Haemostasis 1986, 16: 417-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borsey DQ, Prowse CV, Gray RS, Dawes J, James K, Elton RA, et al.: Platelet and coagulation factors in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. J Clin Pathol 1984, 37: 659-64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Reverter JL, Reverter JC, Tassies D, Rius F, Monteagudo J, Rubies-Prat J, et al.: Thrombomodulin and induced tissue factor expression on monocytes as markers of diabetic microangiopathy: a prospective study on hemostasis and lipoproteins in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Hematol 1997, 56: 93-9. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199710)56:2<93::AID-AJH4>3.0.CO;2-WView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yokoyama H, Myrup B, Rossing P, Ostergaard PB: Increased tissue factor pathway inhibitor activity in IDDM patients with nephropathy. Diabetes Care 1996, 19: 441-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lopez Y, Paloma MJ, Rifon J, Cuesta B, Paramo JA: Measurement of prethrombotic markers in the assessment of acquired hypercoagulable states. Thromb Res 1999, 93: 71-78. 10.1016/S0049-3848(98)00165-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmassi F, Morale M, Puccetti R, De Negri F, Monzani F, Navalesi R, et al.: Coagulation and fibrinolytic system impairment in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Thromb Res 1992, 67: 643-54. 10.1016/0049-3848(92)90068-LView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagai T: Change of lipoprotein (a) and coagulative or fibrinolytic parameters in diabetic patients with nephropathy. J Atheroscler Thromb 1994, 1: 37-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yagame M, Eguchi K, Suzuki D, Machimura H, Takeda H, Inoue W, et al.: Fibrinolysis in patients with diabetic nephropathy determined by plasmin-alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor complexes in plasma. J Diabet Complications 1990, 4: 175-78. 10.1016/0891-6632(90)90018-ZView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones RL, Peterson CM: Hematologic alterations in diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 1981, 70: 339-52. 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90771-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Haffner SJ, Cassells H: Hyperglycemia as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Med 2003, 115(Suppl 8A):6S-11S. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Calles-Escandon J, Garcia-Rubi E, Mirza S, Mortensen A: Type 2 diabetes: one disease, multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Coron Artery Dis 1999, 10: 23-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. American Diabetes Association: Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004, 27(Suppl 1):S79-S83.Google Scholar
  16. Salvati F, Liani M: Role of platelet surface receptor abnormalities in the bleeding and thrombotic diathesis of uremic patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs 2001, 24: 131-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gawaz MP, Dobos G, Spath M, Schollmeyer P, Gurland HJ, Mujais SK: Impaired function of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994, 5: 36-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sloand JA, Sloand EM: Studies on platelet membrane glycoproteins and platelet function during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997, 8: 799-803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sreedhara R, Itagaki I, Hakim RM: Uremic patients have decreased shear-induced platelet aggregation mediated by decreased availability of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptors. Am J Kidney Dis 1996, 27: 355-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nomura S, Hamamoto K, Kawakatsu T, Kido H, Yamaguchi K, Fukuroi T, et al.: Analysis of platelet abnormalities in uremia with and without Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. Nephron 1994, 68: 442-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carr ME, Martin EJ, Kuhn JG, Spiess MD: Onset of force development as a marker of thrombin generation in whole blood: the thrombin generation time (TGT). J Thromb Haemost 2003, 1: 1977-83. 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00337.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Krishnaswami A, Carr ME, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, Minisi AJ, Ornato JP, et al.: Patients with coronary artery disease who present with chest pain have significantly elevated platelet contractile force and clot elastic modulus. Thromb Haemost 2002, 88: 739-44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carr ME, Krishnaswami A, Martin EJ: Platelet contractile force (PCF) and clot elastic modulus (CEM) are elevated in diabetic patients with chest pain. Diabet Med 2002, 19: 862-66. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00834.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carr ME: Development of platelet contractile force as a research and clinical measure of platelet function. Cell Biochem Biophys 2003, 38: 55-78. 10.1385/CBB:38:1:55View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Carr ME, Angchaisuksiri P, Carr SL, Martin EJ: Effect of non-heparin thrombin antagonists on thrombin generation, platelet function, and clot structure in whole blood. Cell Biochem Biophys 2003, 39: 89-99. 10.1385/CBB:39:2:89View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carr ME, Martin EJ, Kuhn JG, Seremetis SV: Effects of recombinant factor VIIa on platelet function and clot structure in blood with deficient prothrombin conversion. Thromb Haemost 2003, 89: 803-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Brophy DF, Martin EJ, Gehr TWB, Carr ME: Enhanced anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin in patients with ESRD as measured by thrombin generation time. Am J Kidney Dis 2004, 44: 270-277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130: 461-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia Frade LJ, de la Calle H, Alava I, Navarro JL, Creighton LJ, Gaffney PJ: Diabetes mellitus as a hypercoagulable state: its relationship with fibrin fragments and vascular damage. Thromb Res 1987, 47: 533-40. 10.1016/0049-3848(87)90358-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes A, McVerry BA, Wilkinson L, Goldstone AH, Lewis D, Bloom A: Diabetes, a hypercoagulable state? Hemostatic variables in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Haematol 1983, 69: 254-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Di Minno G, Martinez J, McKean ML, De La Rosa J, Burke JF, Murphy S: Platelet dysfunction in uremia. Multifaceted defect partially corrected by dialysis. Am J Med 1985, 79: 552-59. 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90051-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sagripanti A, Barsotti G: Bleeding and thrombosis in chronic uremia. Nephron 1997, 75: 125-39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Remuzzi G, Benigni A, Dodesini P, Schieppati A, Livio M, De Gaetano G, et al.: Reduced platelet thromboxane formation in uremia. Evidence for a functional cyclooxygenase defect. J Clin Invest 1983, 71: 762-68.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Weigert AL, Schafer AI: Uremic bleeding: pathogenesis and therapy. Am J Med Sci 1998, 316: 94-104. 10.1097/00000441-199808000-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zwaginga JJ, IJsseldijk MJ, de Groot PG, Vos J, de Bos Kuil RL, Sixma JJ: Defects in platelet adhesion and aggregate formation in uremic bleeding disorder can be attributed to factors in plasma. Arterioscler Thromb 1991, 11: 733-44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Brophy DF, Martin EJ, Carr SL, Kirschbaum BL, Carr ME: Comparison of Platelet Contractile Force and Bleeding Time in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Brophy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement