Open Access

Clopidogrel resistance "Live" – the risk of stent thrombosis should be evaluated before procedures

  • Zuzana Motovska1Email author,
  • Petr Widimsky1,
  • Iuri Marinov2,
  • Robert Petr1,
  • Jaroslava Hajkova3,
  • Jan Kvasnicka3 and
  • the PRAGUE-8 study Investigators
Thrombosis Journal20097:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-6

Received: 29 November 2008

Accepted: 19 May 2009

Published: 19 May 2009

Abstract

Every year, millions of people undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intracoronary stent implantation. A patient from the PRAGUE-8 trial (Optimal pre-PCI clopidogrel loading: 600 mg before every coronary angiography vs. 600 mg in the cath-lab only for PCI patients) is described who suffered from acute stent thrombosis. This patient did not have any relevant inhibition of platelet activation even after the 600 mg dose of clopidogrel. Dose uptitration would have been ineffective. New P2Y12 receptor inhibitors are desperately needed. In the light of recently published data, the use of prasugrel may be considered as an alternative.

Introduction

Every year, millions of people undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intracoronary stent implantation. Dual antiplatelet therapy – aspirin plus clopidogrel – is recommended for the reduction of acute and subacute stent thrombosis [1, 2]. Despite combined antiplatelet therapy, stent thrombosis persists at a rate of 0.5–2% in elective cases, and up to 6% in patients with acute coronary syndromes [3]. Stent thrombosis is a life-threatening event [4]. In addition, also in cases of immediate reperfusion therapy by means of emergency PCI, patients with stent thrombosis have developed a major myocardial infarction, with consequent significant decline in left ventricular function – a strong negative predictor of long-term survival [3]. "Retrospective" laboratory testing in patients with stent thrombosis has shown that poor response ("resistance") to antiplatelet therapy is a risk factor for this event [57].

Case report

A 67-year old woman was admitted to Cardiocentre for an elective coronary angiography, because of changes on the ECG (new negative T waves in leads I, aVL, V1-V3) and new anteroapical hypokinesis seen by echocardiography. She was a cigarette smoker, with a history of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholestrolemia on statin therapy (atorvastatin), and with known coronary artery disease on aspirin. The patient fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PRAGUE-8 trial (see section methods) [8]. After signing of informed consent, she was randomized into group B of this study, and also participated in the vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation state and genetic laboratory substudies. In the laboratory substudy, the time course of platelet inhibition after clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg per day) was investigated.

On the second day of hospitalization, the patient underwent a coronary angiography, which showed an 80% stenotic lesion on her left anterior descending artery. The lesion was treated with ad hoc performed PCI with the implantation of a bare metal stent. The success of the procedure was optimal (Figure 1A, B). The next day, the patient was stable, did not have any complications, and was discharged home. The recommendation for drug therapy was as follows: ASA (100 mg/d), clopidogrel (75 mg/d), metoprolol, ramipril, atorvastatin, peroral antidiabetic.
Figure 1

Coronary angiography and pecutaneous coronary intevention studies. A, B – elective during the first hospitalization; C, D – urgent during the second hospitlization.

46 hours after stent implantation, the patient returned to the hospital because of chest pain, vertigo and swelling. There were ST segment elevations in leads V1-V3 and a new second-degree A-V block according to the ECG (Figure 2). An emergency coronary angiography was performed, and showed 100% occlusion of the left anterior descending artery due to acute stent thrombosis. Immediate ballon angioplasty with heparin and eptifibatide opened the artery and led to a good angiographic result (Figure 1C, D).
Figure 2

ECG at the second hospital admission.

What did the VASP phosphorylation study show? There was no reaction to the administration of clopidogrel – the patient was completely "resistant" to this drug (Figure 3). Interestingly, by the second admission the ADP-stimulated platelet reactivity was even higher than the basal value without clopidogrel therapy. The most probable explanation for this was an acute myocardial infarction, which was the reason for the second hospitalization.
Figure 3

Clopidogrel efficacy; ADP-induced platelet activation (Platelet reactivity index) [11]before and after clopidogrel.

In the genetic substudy we investigated the prevalence of nine platelet and haemostatic gene polymorphisms. The results of this extensive genetic testing are shown in Table 1. Detected single nucleotid polymorphisms of P2Y12 and GPIIIa receptors had been recognized as possible intrinsic mechanisms of clopidogrel resistance [8, 9].
Table 1

Genetic testing for platelet polymorphisms and procoagulation state

Polymorphism

Result

Leiden mutation

Negative

Factor II mutation

Negative

P2Y12 H1/H2 haplotyp

Negative

P2Y12 (32C/T)

Heterozygote

GPVI (13254C/T)

Negative

PAR-1 (IVSn-14A/T)

Heterozygote

GPIIIa (PlA1/PlA2)

Heterozygote

COX-1 (-842A/G)

Negative

COX-1 (50C/T)

Negative

Methods

The PRAGUE-8 study was a randomized multi-center open label clinical trial which compared the routine clopidogrel 600 mg pretreatment more than 6 hours before coronary angiography (group A) with the selective administration of clopidogrel 600 mg only for PCI patients in the catheterization laboratory, after the coronary angiography and just prior to PCI (group B) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00432120) [10]. The inclusion criteria were: a planned elective coronary angiography for suspected or proven chronic stable coronary artery disease or medically fully stabilized acute coronary syndrome, a signed written informed consent, and age ≥ 18 years. The primary end point was the first clinical occurrence of any of the following: death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or re-intervention within 7 days. Secondary end-points were: periprocedural troponin elevation (> 3 × ULN), TIMI-flow after PCI, bleeding complications, and each individual component of the combined primary end-point.

Vasodilator Stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) is a platelet intracellular actin regulatory protein. The phosphorylation of VASP is regulated by the cyclic adenosine monophosphate cascade. Prostaglandin E1 activates this cascade, whereas it is inhibited by adenosine diphosphate through P2Y12 receptors. The phosphorylation status of VASP correlates with P2Y12 receptor inhibition, whereas its non-phosphorylation state correlates with the active form of the P2Y12 receptor. Levels of VASP phosphorylation/dephosphorylation reflect P2Y12 inhibition/activation [11]. The effect of thienopyridines can be demonstrated by the persistence of VASP phosphorylation induced by prostaglandin E1, even with the simultaneous addition of ADP [12, 13].

Analysis of VASP phosphorylation by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry analysis was done in a laboratory awarded by the Joint Commission International accreditation. Examiners analyzing the VASP phosphorylation state were blinded to the patient-related data. The VASP phosphorylation state was determined in whole blood by flow cytometry using the standardized (CE, IVD) platelet VASP/P2Y12 assay (Biocytex, France). Briefly, the blood sample was first incubated with prostaglandin E1 alone or prostaglandin E1 + ADP. After cellular permeabilization, VASP under its phosphorylated state was labeled by indirect, no-wash immunofluorescence using a specific monoclonal antibody (16C2). Dual-color flow cytometric analysis was performed on a Becton Dickinson FACS Calibur cytometer to compare the two tested conditions, and to evaluate the capacity of ADP to inhibit VASP phosphorylation for each sample. The platelet population was identified by forward scatter, side scatter and fluorescence (anti CD61-PE) gating, then 5000 events were acquired at low rate to list mode files.

A platelet reactivity index (PRI) was calculated from the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of samples incubated with prostaglandin E1 or prostaglandin E1 and ADP, according to the formula: PRI = [(MFI(PGE1) - MFI(PGE1+ADP)/MFI(PGE1)] × 100. If inhibition of the platelet P2Y12 receptor by clopidogrel occurs, ADP fails to cause a decrease in VASP phosphorylation and the PRI converges to 0. In contrast, if treatment is ineffective (i.e. a low responder), dephosphorylation of VASP by ADP still occurs, and the PRI reaches values of ≥ 0.5 or greater [11].

Discussion

How should this patient be managed? What do the recommendations say? We have only the expert consensus position regarding aspirin resistance [14]. There is no official expert statement on the problem of clopidogrel ineffectiveness or resistance. The ACC/AHA guidelines recommends that "in patients in whom subacute thrombosis may be catastrophic or lethal, platelet aggregation studies may be considered and the dose of clopidogrel increased to 150 mg per day if less than 50% inhibition of platelet aggregation is demonstrated" [2].

As Figure 3 shows, our patient did not have any relevant inhibition of ADP-induced platelet reactivity even after the 600 mg clopidogrel. Therefore, dose up-titration would have been ineffective. Administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor during emergency PCI for stent thrombosis has been identified as the only independent predictor for the prevention of recurrent stent thrombosis [3]. Third generation tienopyridine prasugrel provides faster onset and greater inhibition of P2Y12 receptor-mediated platelet aggregation than clopidogrel, because of greater and more efficient generation of the active metabolite [15, 16]. Pharmacodynamic data have also shown that prasugrel achieves a sufficient degree of platelet inhibition within 30 minutes after treatment [14]. In a crossover study, non-responders to 300 mg of clopidogrel responded effectively to a loading dose of 60 mg of prasugrel [17]. This favorable laboratory profile resulted in clinical efficacy for prasugrel. The TRITON-TIMI 38 [18] trial recently showed that in comparison to clopidogrel, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled PCI. Stent thrombosis was reduced by approximately 50% in the prasugrel group compared to the clopidogrel group. The price for this clinical benefit was a significantly higher risk of major bleeding.

In patients with planned elective PCI for whom the optimal time for clopidogrel pretreatment is a day before procedure [19], a test for drug effectiveness before the procedure will identify patients with insufficient platelet inhibition. In these patients, the administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during the procedure and a higher dose (150 mg per day) of clopidogrel after stent implantation should be advised to prevent stent thrombosis [2, 3]. In patients with no response to the clopidogrel loading dose, prasugrel seems to be an effective alternative [1518, 20]. Flow cytometric determination of VASP phosphorylation state strongly correlated with the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation resulting from specific P2Y12 blockade by a specific antagonist of the P2Y12 receptor (AR-C69931MX) [6]. This test gives reliable results in whole blood samples kept at room temperature for up to 48 h [6, 21]. Aspirin and abciximab did not interfere with VASP phosphorylation [9, 19]. A flow cytometric analysis of VASP phosphorylation can be recommended as an index (the gold standard) of the efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitors [21].

Conclusion

In patients with planned elective PCI a flow cytometric VASP phosphorylation test will identify those without sufficient P2Y12 receptors inhibition and with risk of stent thrombosis. In patients with no response to the clopidogrel loading dose, prasugrel seems to be an effective alternative.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Charles University Prague Research Project nr. MSM0021620817 and by the Research Project nr. MZ0VFN2005, Ministry of Health, Czech Republic.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Third Medical Faculty Charles University & University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
(2)
The Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
(3)
First Medical Faculty Charles University and Thrombotic Centre General University Hospital

References

  1. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, Jorgensen E, Marco J, Nordrehaug JE, Ruzyllo W, Urban P, Stone GW, Wijns W: Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005, 26(8):804-847. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi138View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, Morrison DA, O'Neil WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Williams DO, Antman EM, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006, 113(7):e166-286. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.173220View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wenaweser P, Rey C, Eberli F, Togni M, Tuller D, Locher S, Remondino A, Seiler C, Hess OM, Meier B, Windecker S: Stent thrombosis following bare-metal stent implantation success of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and predictors of adverse outcome. Eur Heart J 2005, 26(12):1180-1187. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi135View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle B, Rihal CS, O'Sullivan CJ, Lennon RJ, Wiste HJ, Bell M, Bresnahan J, Holmes DR Jr: Outcomes of stent thrombosis and restenosis during extended follow-up of patients treated with bare-metal coronary stents. Circulation 2007, 116(21):2391-2398. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707331View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barragan P, Bouvier JL, Roquebert PO, Macaluso G, Commeau P, Comet B, Lafont A, Camoin L, Walter U, Eigenthaler M: Resistance to thienopyridines: clinical detection of coronary stent thrombosis by monitoring of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003, 59(3):295-302. 10.1002/ccd.10497View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Samara W, Yoho JA, Hayes K, Fissha MZ, Tantry US: Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46(10):1827-1832. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.056View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wenaweser P, Dörffler-Melly J, Imboden K, Windecker S, Togni M, Meier B, Haeberli A, Hess OM: Stent thrombosis is associated with an impaired response to antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45(11):1748-1752. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.058View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nguyen TA, Diodati JG, Pharand C: Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45(8):1157-64. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.034View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Motovska Z, Widimsky P, Kvasnicka J, Petr R, Bilkova D, Hajkova J, Marinov J, Simek S, Kala P, on behalf of the PRAGUE 8 study investigators: High loading dose of clopidogrel is unable to satisfactorily inhibit platelet reactivity in patients with glycoprotein IIIA gene polymorphism- a genetic substudy of PRAGUE-8 trial. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2009, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Widimsky P, Motovska Z, Simek S, Kala P, Pudil R, Holm F, Petr R, Bilkova D, Skalicka H, Kuchynka P, Poloczek M, Miklik M, Maly M, Aschermann M, on behalf of the PRAGUE-8 trial Investigators: Clopidogrel pretreatment in stable angina: for all patients > 6 hours before elective coronary angiography or only for angiographically selected patients a few minutes before PCI? A randomized multicenter trial PRAGUE-8. Eur Heart J 2008, 29(12):1495-1503. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn169PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Aleil B, Ravanat C, Cazenave JP, Rochoux G, Heitz A, Gachet C: Flow cytometric analysis of intraplatelet VASP phosphorylation for the detection of clopidogrel resistance in patients with ischemic cardiovascular diseases. J Thromb Haemost 2005, 3(1):85-92. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01063.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwarz UR, Geiger J, Walter U, Eigenthaler M: Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular VASP phosphorylation for the assessment of activating and inhibitory signal transduction pathways in human platelets–definition and detection of ticlopidine/clopidogrel effects. Thromb Haemost 1999, 82(3):1145-1152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger J, Teichmann L, Grossmann R, Aktas B, Steigerwald U, Walter U, Schinzel R: Monitoring of clopidogrel action: comparison of methods. Clin Chem 2005, 51(6):957-965. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.047050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Michelson AD, Cattaneo M, Eikelboom JW, Gurbel P, Kottke-Marchant K, Kunicki TJ, Pulcinelli FM, Cerletti C, Rao AK: Aspirin resistance: position paper of the Working Group on Aspirin Resistance. J Thromb Haemost 2005, 3: 1309-1311. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01351.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wallentin L, Varenhorst C, James S, Erlinge D, Braun OO, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, Winters KJ, Siegbahn A: Prasugrel achieves greater and faster P2Y12receptor-mediated platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to more efficient generation of its active metabolite in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008, 29(1):21-30. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm545View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, O'Donoghue M, Neumann FJ, Michelson AD, Angiolillo DJ, Hod H, Montalescot G, Miller DL, Jakubowski JA, Cairns R, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Antman EM, Braunwald E, PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 Investigators: Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation 2007, 116(25):2923-2932. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brandt JT, Payne CD, Wiviott SD, Weerakkody G, Farid NA, Small DS, Jakubowski JA, Naganuma H, Winters KJ: A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. Am Heart J 2007, 153: 66.e9-66.e16. 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, DeServi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkady G, Gibson CM, Antman EM, TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators: Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Eng J Med 2007, 357: 2001-2015. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Brennan DM, Topol EJ, CREDO Investigators: Optimal timing for the initiation of pre-treatment with 300 mg clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(5):939-943. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhatt DL: Intensifying Platelet Inhibition – Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. New Engl J Med 2007, 357: 2078-2081. 10.1056/NEJMe0706859View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gachet C, Aleil B: Testing antiplatelet therapy. Eur Heart J Suppl 2008, 10(suppl A):A28-A34. 10.1093/eurheartj/sum081View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Motovska et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.