Open Access

A follow-up study of the fate of small asymptomatic deep venous thromboses

Thrombosis Journal20108:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-8-4

Received: 15 July 2009

Accepted: 12 February 2010

Published: 12 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Postoperative asymptomatic deep venous thromboses (ADVT) can give rise to posttthrombotic syndrome (PTS), but there are still many unresolved issues in this context. For example, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the fate of small ADVT following minor orthopedic surgery. This follow-up study evaluates postthrombotic changes and clinical manifestations of PTS in a group of patients with asymptomatic calf vein DVT after surgery for Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients with distal ADVT were contacted and enrolled in a follow-up consisting of a single visit at the hospital at a mean time of 5 years postoperatively, including clinical examination and scoring, ultrasonography and venous plethysmography. All patients had participated in DVT-screening with colour duplex ultrasound (CDU) 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively and 80% of them were treated with anticoagulation.

Results

With CDU postthrombotic changes and deep venous reflux were detected at follow-up in more than 50% of the patients, more commonly in somewhat larger calf DVT:s initially affecting more than one vessel. However, only about 10% of the patients had significant venous reflux according to venous plethysmography. No patient had plethysmographic evidence of remaining outflow obstruction, but presence of postthrombotic changes shown with CDU negatively influenced venous outflow capacity measured with plethysmography. A clinical entity of PTS was rarely found and occurred only in two patients (4%) and then classified by Villalta scoring as of mild degree with few clinical signs of disease. Distal ADVT:s detected in the early postoperative period (3 weeks) showed DVT-progression in 75% of the limbs that were still immobilized and without anticoagulation.

Conclusions

Asymptomatic postoperative distal DVT:s following surgery for Achilles tendon rupture have a good prognosis and a favourable clinical outcome. In our material of 46 patients the general appearance of the clinical entity of PTS at 5 years follow-up was low (<5%). Morphological and functional abnormalities were mainly seen in those patients that initially had somewhat larger distal DVT:s involving more than one deep calf vein segment.

Background

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common cause of morbidity after orthopedic surgery, both in the shorttime period as pulmonary embolism and for longterm development of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) [1]. The majority of postoperative DVT:s are small and asymptomatic, nevertheless after major orthopedic surgery asymptomatic DVT (ADVT) can give rise to PTS in around 20% of the patients [2, 3]. Therefore, different thromboprophylactic regiments are routinely used in connection with major orthopedic surgery, and during recent years also in increasing frequency with minor orthopedic procedures that involves immobilization of the lower limb. However, the need and the effect of thromboprophylaxis for the latter are not well-established. In general, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the fate of ADVT following minor orthopedic surgery, especially for small ADVT limited to calf veins.

Earlier, contrast phlebography was mandatory to diagnose ADVT and therefore there were limited possibilities for follow-up studies. Technical improvement of the ultrasonographic equipments has changed this so that colour duplex ultrasound (CDU) now has the ability to diagnose ADVT, even those limited to calf veins [4]. This also gives opportunity to study the fate of small ADVT and the development of postthrombotic changes by repeated noninvasive examinations.

The present study reports ultrasonographic findings of ADVT in a group of patients operated for Achilles tendon rupture and a follow-up of these patients after approximately 5 years. The study focuses on detection of postthrombotic changes following calf vein DVT:s and the hemodynamic consequences of these measured with venous plethysmography, and evaluation of the clinical manifestations of PTS in this group of patients.

Methods

Study population and design

One-hundred-five consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective study of postoperative DVT after surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture between November 2001 and May 2004. Patients were randomized to double-blinded treatment with either placebo or dalteparin 5.000 U Fragmin (Pfizer) once daily for 6 weeks. The initial study protocol involved a carefully performed colour duplex scanning by highly experienced personal for DVT-screening three and six weeks after surgery. The procedure included evaluation of deep veins from the groin to the ankle, including muscle veins. In general, a phlebography was performed or attempted if the duplex scan was abnormal. Based on these diagnostic tests the physician in charge decided whether treatment should be initiated and if the patients at the 3-week visit would fulfil the study protocol or not. The procedures and the acute results are described in a previous report [5].

Altogether 48 patients had abnormal duplex results indicating DVT, at the time of diagnosis there were two proximal and 46 distal DVT:s (= below the popliteal vein). Both proximal DVT:s occurred in the placebo group and were detected at 3 weeks. The DVT was verified phlebographically in most patients, although it was not attempted in eight of the cases.

Our material consists of the 46 patients with a distal DVT (Table 1). In those cases that were left untreated and where a progress of DVT extension was detected with CDU at 6 weeks, the largest extension is reported in Table 1 (see also Table 2).
Table 1

Postoperative asymptomatic distal DVT at ultrasonography, grouped according to size, and distribution of prophylaxis/placebo within each group

 

Patients with DVT (n= 46)

Prophylaxis/placebo 21/25

1. Isolated calf muscular vein

5 (11%)

2/3

2. One deep calf vein stem †

24 (52%)

13/11

3. Two or more deep calf veins ‡

17 (37%)

6/11

† In 19 patients in a fibular vein, in 5 patients in a posterior tibial vein.

‡ Includes one patient with a muscular vein DVT that during the immobilisation period progressed into calf veins and popliteal vein (see Table 2 - Patient nr 7)

Table 2

Colour duplex ultrasound (CDU) findings in 9 patients with distal DVT at 3 weeks, and also investigated 6 weeks postoperatively

Patient

3-week CDU

6-week CDU

Prophylaxis

Warfarin

Phlebography

Nr 1

DVT in two soleus veins

Partial regress, only one soleus vein

Placebo

Started at 3 weeks

Negative, no DVT

Nr 2

DVT in one fibular vein

Unchanged from 3 weeks

Dalteparin

No secondary prophylaxis

Initially interpreted as negative, positive at secondary evaluation

Nr 3

DVT in one soleus vein

Progress into gastrocn and fibular veins

Dalteparin

Started at 6 weeks

Positive, performed at 6 weeks

Nr 4

DVT in one soleus vein

Unchanged from 3 weeks

Placebo

No secondary prophylaxis

Initially interpreted as negative, positive at secondary evaluation

Nr 5

DVT in one gastrocn vein

Progress into one more gastrocn vein

Placebo

No secondary prophylaxis

Not performed

Nr 6

DVT in soleus vein

Progress into two fibular veins

Placebo

Started at 6 weeks

Positive, performed at 6 weeks

Nr 7

DVT in two gastrocn veins

Progress into popliteal and calf veins

Placebo

Started at 6 weeks

Not performed

Nr 8

DVT in one soleus vein

Progress into two fibular veins

Dalteparin

Started at 6 weeks

Positive, performed at 6 weeks

Nr 9

DVT in one posterior tibial vein

Progress into two fibular veins

Dalteparin

Started at 6 weeks

Negative at 3 weeks, not performed at 6 weeks

Thirty-four of the 46 patients with duplex-diagnosed DVT were treated with warfarin for three months. One patient was treated for six months and two patients received only low-molecular-weight heparin for less than three months. Nine patients received no secondary prophylaxis, either because of soleus vein thrombosis that were considered not to need treatment or in some cases because the phlebography initially was interpreted as negative and a DVT was diagnosed later at a standardized evaluation according to the study protocol.

The follow-up consisted of a single visit at the hospital at a mean time of 5 years postoperatively (range, 43 to 71 months), including clinical examination and scoring, ultrasonography and venous plethysmography. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave their written informed consent prior to their inclusion.

Clinical and laboratory investigations at 5-years follow-up

Symptoms and clinical findings were rated according to the Villalta score. For clinical symptoms, the patients were asked to rate the subjective severity of each of five symptoms (pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritis and paresthesia), and for clinically objective signs the examinator evaluated the severity of each of six signs (edema, redness, skin induration, hyperpigmentation, venous ectasia and pain on calf compression). Both symptoms and objective signs were rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) and the points were summarized for a total Villalta score where a score of ≥ 5 is used to indicate presence of PTS. Commonly used subcategories are: 0-4 absent or minimal PTS, 5-9 mild PTS, 10-15 moderate PTS and a score of ≥ 15 severe PTS [6, 7]. Clinical classification was accomplished using the C-classes of the CEAP score for clinical appearance of venous disease: C0 = no visible or palpable signs of venous disease, C1 = telangiectases or reticular veins, C2 = varicose veins, C3 = edema, C4 = skin changes, C5 = healed ulceration and C6 = active ulceration [8].

CDU was performed using a colour-flow duplex imager (Siemens Acuson Sequoia™ 512 Ultrasound System, Mountain View, CA, USA). A 6 MHz linear-array imaging transducer was used in conjunction with pulsed and colour-flow Doppler equipment. All examinations included both limbs and were performed by a sonographer without knowledge of the results of the previous duplex analysis. The patients were placed in a supine position for scanning of veins above the knee and in a sitting position for scanning of veins at and below the knee. The following venous segments were evaluated for each patient: common femoral, femoral (mid-thigh), popliteal, posterior tibial, fibular, gastrocnemius, soleus and great saphenous (thigh and calf). Vessel wall abnormality (irregularities, wall thickening, non-compressibility, reduced or occluded lumens) was used to assess postthrombotic changes. Valvular function of all veins was evaluated by distal manual compression. A reflux duration longer than 0.5 s was considered significant [9, 10].

Venous function tests were performed using computerized strain-gauge plethysmography. The procedure comprised static measurement of venous outflow capacity and dynamic measurement of volume change after muscular exercise, using a computerized mercury strain-gauge plethysmograph (S.I. Veintest 2, Sels Instruments N.V., Vorselaar, Belgium). Using strain-gauge wires around each calf, venous emptying (VE, ml/100 ml × min) was measured and expressed as the outflow rate during the first second after release of venous occlusion by thigh cuffs inflated to a pressure of 60 mmHg [11]. A low VE (< 50 ml/100 ml × min) indicates a significant venous outflow obstruction [12, 13]. For dynamic measurements, strain-gauge wires were applied just proximal to the malleolus and volume changes were measured during and after 15 knee bends. Half-refilling time (T 1/2, sec) was measured from the refilling curve after exercise. A short T 1/2 (< 7 sec) indicates venous reflux [14].

Data analysis and statistical methods

Data are presented as mean and SD. Differences between means were tested for significance using paired and unpaired two-sided Student's t-tests. Differences between proportions were analyzed using chi-square tests. Correlation analyses were used to characterize relationships between variables. Statistical significance was assumed at P < 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

Results

There were 36 males and 10 females with a mean age of 41 years (range 23-60). Their body mass index was 26 (SD 3) and did not change from time of diagnosis to the follow-up examination. The side of the operation was equally distributed (21 right/25 left). None of them had a history of previous DVT, but five patients had heredity for venous thromboembolism. Two patients experienced a new DVT, in the contralateral limb, during the follow-up period. No patient had pulmonary embolism.

Thrombus evolution at 3 and 6 weeks

Thirty of the 46 distal DVT:s were diagnosed at 3 weeks and the remaining 16 at the 6-week control. Of the 30 DVT:s diagnosed early, 18 (60%) occurred in patients in the placebo group and 12 (40%) occurred in patients belonging to the group receiving pharmacological prophylaxis (p = 0.9). In other words, of those with DVT in the placebo group there was an overweight of early occurring thrombus (72% at 3 weeks), whereas patients receiving prophylaxis had a more equal distribution between time for thrombus development (57% at 3 weeks and 43% at 6 weeks).

Nine of the patients underwent both 3- and 6-weeks ultrasound examination, despite a positive finding at 3 weeks. Eight of these patients received no secondary prophylaxis from 3 to 6 weeks and in six of them the thrombus progressed into more proximal and larger deep veins (Table 2). As can be seen in Table 2 progression mainly concerned muscle vein DVT, since five of the six muscle vein DVT:s that were left untreated during continued immobilisation showed thrombus progression.

Colour duplex ultrasound at 5 years follow-up

Postthrombotic changes were seen in 25 of the 46 (54%) operated limbs with postoperative distal DVT, in all cases limited to the distal veins. Ten of these patients had at least one still occluded distal vein segment. Postthrombotic changes were also seen in two contralateral limbs, in one case involving both proximal and distal veins. This patient had had a new symptomatic DVT after a knee operation during the follow-up. The other patient with contralateral postthrombotic changes had undergone an uncomplicated operation of an Achilles tendon rupture also in this leg three years following the initial event.

Deep venous reflux was found in 24 of the 46 (52%) operated limbs and also in four contralateral limbs. Twenty-three of the operated limbs had reflux isolated to distal segments, in six limbs involving both posterior tibial veins and fibular veins and in 17 limbs only either of these. One patient had reflux in the popliteal vein and in posterior tibial and fibular veins. Two operated limbs had deep venous reflux without any postthrombotic changes; one fibular and one posterior tibial vein segment, and three limbs had postthrombotic changes without any deep venous reflux. Deep venous reflux in the contralateral limbs regarded in one case three segments (popliteal, posterior tibial, fibular) in a patient with a recent symptomatic DVT (see above), and in the remaining three cases both posterior and fibular reflux, isolated posterior tibial reflux and isolated fibular vein reflux. Reflux in the great saphenous vein was seen in 22 operated limbs and in 14 contralateral limbs (n.s.).

The relation between initial thrombus segment and localization of postthrombotic changes at follow-up is shown in Table 3. In four patients we found postthrombotic changes in deep veins that initially were free from thrombus, this concerned in three cases fibular DVT with postthrombotic changes at follow-up seen also in posterior tibial veins and vice versa in one case (one of these were in a patient who did not receive secondary prophylaxis). Deep venous reflux at follow-up was more commonly found in initially large DVT:s (Group 3 in Table 1) than in initially small ones limited to only one deep calf vein (Group 2 in Table 1); 13/17 (76%) vs.11/24 (46%) p < 0.05 (see Table 1). The same was found for presence of postthrombotic changes, but this difference did not reach statistical significance; 71% vs. 54%.
Table 3

Relation between initial thrombus vessel and presence and location of postthrombotic changes as seen by ultrasonography at 5 years follow-up

 

No post-thrombotic changes

Posttrombotic changes

  

Fewer segments

Same segments

New segments

Initial DVT vein segment:

    

Muscular veins (n = 5)

5

   

Post tibial veins, PTV (n = 7)

3

 

3

1

Fibular veins, F (n = 27)

12

 

12

3

PTV + F (n = 7) †

1

5

1

 

† Includes one patient with a muscular vein DVT that during the immobilisation period progressed into calf veins and popliteal vein (see Table 2 - Patient nr 7)

Venous plethysmography at 5 years follow-up

Plethysmographic results for operated and contralateral limbs are shown in Table 4, there was no significant difference between the limbs. In the operated limbs, there was a significant negative relationship between presence of postthrombotic changes and rate of venous emptying (VE; r= -0.36, p = 0.012). However, there was no significant relationship between T 1/2 and presence of deep and/or superficial venous reflux. Four patients had a T 1/2 < 7 sec indicating significant venous reflux, all these had deep venous reflux demonstrated with CDU.
Table 4

Results from venous plethysmography at 5 years follow-up in limbs with postoperative distal DVT and in contralateral limbs.

 

VE (ml/100 ml × min)

T 1/2 (sec)

Contralateral limbs (n = 46)

107 (23)

16 (8)

DVT limbs, all (n = 46)

102 (24)

17 (9)

1. Isolated calf muscular vein (n = 5)

102 (12)

15 (6)

2. One deep calf vein stem (n = 24)

103 (27)

19 (10)

3. Two or more deep calf veins (n = 17)

102 (23)

15 (8)

Mean and (SD); VE, venous emptying; T 1/2, half-refilling time

Clinical examination at 5 years follow-up

The Villalta symptom score ranged from 0 to 7 (median 0) and the score for clinical signs ranged from 0 to 2 (median 0). Twenty-eight patients (61%) scored 0 for symptoms, 32 patients (70%) scored 0 for clinical signs and 22 patients (48%) had a total Villalta score of 0. The total Villalta PTS score ranged from 0 to 8 (median 1) and three patients (7%) had a score ≥ 5 indicating presence of PTS. All three patients were classified as having mild PTS (a score of 5-9). Regarding clinical classification according to CEAP 29 patients were classified as C0, 10 patients as C1, six patients as C2 and one patient as C3 because of slight edema.

Two of the three patients with total Villalta score ≥ 5 had DVT:s affecting more than one vessel and with remaining postthrombotic changes in combination with deep venous reflux. Their CEAP-classes were 2 and 3, respectively. The third patient had no morphological or physiological abnormalities in the venous system at follow-up and the CEAP-class was 1. His Villalta score of 8 consisted mainly of a symptom score of 7 and no real clinical signs of venous disease.

Discussion

The present study regards a consecutive series of 46 patients with small ADVT initially limited to calf veins diagnosed with CDU following surgery for Achilles tendon rupture, and the ultrasonographic appearance of these thrombi in the acute phase and at 5 years follow-up. Postthrombotic changes and deep venous reflux were detected at follow-up in more than 50% of the patients. In this respect, initial thrombus size was of importance since these abnormalities more commonly occurred in calf DVT:s initially affecting more than one vessel. Moreover, presence of postthrombotic changes negatively influenced venous outflow capacity measured with venous plethysmography. However, the general appearance of the clinical entity of PTS was low (around 5%).

There is still a debate whether the proper treatment of isolated calf DVT is anticoagulation or serial follow-up to identify propagation into proximal veins [15, 16]. Regarding asymptomatic postoperative calf DVT:s the situation is even more complex since they will not be detected unless a diagnostic screening procedure is performed. Once detected, either of the two management strategies above is adopted. There are no firm results in the literature regarding the risk of withholding treatment of distal ADVT:s and the present study was not designed for that purpose. There were only nine patients in our series that did not receive anticoagulation, they were left untreated in a nonrandomized fashion. However, something that our study demonstrated was that ADVT that are left untreated and with the limb still immobilized will progress and propagate into larger veins in a substantial number of cases. Thus, in our series propagation was seen in six of eight limbs with DVT at 3 weeks that was left without further treatment but still immobilized (Table 2).

The randomized series from where this cohort of patients is taken could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of pharmacological prophylaxis regarding incidence of postoperative ADVT [5]. What could be seen in this further evaluation of the patients with ADVT diagnosed with CDU was that prophylaxis tended to delay the occurrence of DVT compared with the DVT:s occurring in the group receiving placebo. This was even more evident when also proximal DVT:s are considered, since both these occurred early and in the placebo group. This possible effect of prophylaxis is potentially beneficial since the limbs with DVT occurring later will for a shorter period be immobilized and thus reduces a substantial trigger for thrombus progression resulting in smaller DVT:s, and from a theoretical point less frequency of pulmonary embolism.

Postthrombotic changes and deep venous reflux were more common in patients with large than in small DVT:s. This is theoretically reasonable and the validity of our findings with CDU are supported by the fact that presence of postthrombotic changes negatively influenced venous outflow capacity measured with plethysmography. Similar to other reports concerning symptomatic calf DVT, we found the fibular vein to be the most common DVT site [17, 18]. In contrast to what Masuda et al found at follow-up [18], we observed a rather high degree of deep venous reflux and also still-occluded vein segments. Improvements in the ultrasonographic technique during the last decade with increased diagnostic ability might be part of this discrepancy. One further observation was presence of postthrombotic changes and deep venous reflux at follow-up found in veins not primarily affected by DVT, probably representing thrombus progression during anticoagulation or formation of silent re-thrombosis at later occasions. Both thrombus extension and late occurring reflux in veins not involved in DVT are earlier described for symptomatic DVT:s [1821].

None of the patients had a remaining venous outflow obstruction (= VE < 50 ml/100 ml × min), the lowest values were found in two patients with postthrombotic changes (58 and 59 ml/100 ml × min, respectively). We found no significant relation between plethysmographic measures of reflux (T 1/2) and presence of reflux demonstrated with CDU. Similar observations are earlier described using another type of plethysmographic evaluation [22]. This lack of relationship probably reflects a combination of the fact that CDU also detects "normal reflux" in some individuals that have no relation to earlier DVT, occurrence of postthrombotic reflux without hemodynamic importance, and the rather high variability of these measurements obtained during exercise [23]. A more distinct and accurate interpretation of reflux shown with CDU is to consider deep venous reflux to be of real hemodynamic importance only in cases with a short T 1/2, as we found in only four of our 24 (17%) DVT-limbs with reflux in deep veins.

We used the Villalta score to assess PTS and as suggested by others a total score of ≥ 5 indicates presence of PTS [24, 25]. The Villalta score is in our opinion the best validated clinical scale to diagnose PTS, a disadvantage when comparison with other studies is that a number of them does not use validated scales and the definition of PTS varies [26, 27]. Nevertheless, it seems from the literature as the incidence of PTS following ADVT might have decreased during the last decades from approximately 20-30% to around 10% [2, 3, 28, 29]. Besides methodological differences an explanation can be better prophylactic regiments and earlier mobilization resulting in smaller DVT:s with better prognosis as suggested by our results. Another factor that might have changed over time is use of compression stockings, where increased use probably reduces the risk of PTS [2931].

Besides a validated clinical scale, we think it is necessary to use methods that can demonstrate residual morphological and functional abnormalities in this group of patients. In our study three patients (7%) had a Villalta score ≥ 5 indicating presence of PTS. However, in contrast to the other two patients one of these had normal findings with CDU and plethysmography and we suggest that his subjective symptoms are caused by musculoskeletal problems that might be related to surgery and it is probably so that the true incidence of PTS in our material is as low as 4% (2/46).

Conclusions

Asymptomatic postoperative distal DVT:s have a good prognosis and a favourable clinical outcome. At 5 years follow-up of 46 patients with distal ADVT:s morphological and functional abnormalities were mainly seen in those patients that initially had somewhat larger DVT:s involving more than one deep calf vein. In our material the clinical entity of PTS was rarely found and could be documented only in two patients (4%) and then classified as of mild degree with few clinical signs of disease. Distal ADVT:s detected in the early postoperative period (3 weeks) showed DVT-progression in 75% of the limbs that were still immobilized and without anticoagulation.

Abbreviations

ADVT: 

asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis

CDU: 

colour duplex ultrasound

VE: 

venous emptying (plethysmographic index of outflow capacity)

PTS: 

postthrombotic syndrome

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by ALF project funding from the Stockholm County Council and from Karolinska Institutet. We are grateful to research nurse Catharina Levander and sonographer Marie Herlitz-Lindberg for skilful contributions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet
(2)
Department of Clinical Physiology
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine
(4)
Department of Orthopedics

References

  1. Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG: Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 2004, 126: 338S-400S. 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.338SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wille-Jorgensen P, Jorgensen LN, Crawford M: Asymptomatic postoperative deep vein thrombosis and the development of postthrombotic syndrome. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2005, 93: 236-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schindler OS, Dalziel R: Post-thrombotic syndrome after total hip or knee arthroplasty: incidence in patients with asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis. J Orthop Surg 2005, 13: 113-9.Google Scholar
  4. Lapidus L, de Bri E, Ponzer S, Elvin A, Norén A, Rosfors S: High sensitivity with color duplex sonography in thrombosis screening after ankle fracture surgery. J Thromb Haemost 2006, 4: 807-12. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01832.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lapidus LJ, Rosfors S, Ponzer S, Levander C, Elvin A, Larfars G, de Bri E: Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin after surgical treatment of achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Orthop Trauma 2007, 21: 52-7. 10.1097/01.bot.0000250741.65003.14View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kahn SR: Measurement properties of the Villalta scale to define and classify the severity of the post-thrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2009, 7: 884-8. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03339.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Prandoni P, Villalta S, Polistena P, Bernardi E, Cogo A, Girolami A: Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and the post-thrombotic syndrome. Haemotologica 1995, 80(suppl):42-8.Google Scholar
  8. Eklof B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, Carpentier PH, Gloviczki P, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL, Myers K, Padberg FT, Perrin M, Ruckley CV, Coleridge Smith P, Wakefield TW: Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004, 40: 1248-52. 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haenen JH, van Langen H, Janssen MCH, Wollersheim H, van't Hof MA, van Asten WNJC, Skotnicki SH, Thien T: Venous duplex scanning of the leg: range, variability and reproducibility. Clin Sci 1999, 96: 271-7. 10.1042/CS19980254View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Labropoulos N, Tiongson J, Pryor L, Tassiopoulos AK, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Baker WH: Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg 2003, 38: 793-8. 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00424-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shi Z, Boccalon H, Elias A, Garcia-Serrano A: Plethysmographic findings in normal subjects using a capacitance mode. Int Angiol 1992, 11: 127-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shi Z, Boccalon H, Elias A, Garcia-Serrano A: Detection of deep vein thrombosis with a computerized strain gauge plethysmograph. Int Angiol 1992, 11: 160-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosfors S, Ahlstrom H, Boccalon H, Nilsson S, Partsch H, Rooke TW, Shi Z, Pawlowski A: Computerized strain-gauge plethysmography using a capacitance mode in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Scope on Phlebology and Lymphology 1996, 3: 8-12.Google Scholar
  14. Rooke TW, Heser JL, Osmundson PJ: Exercise strain-gauge venous plethysmography: evaluation of a "new" device for assessing lower limb venous incompetence. Angiology 1992, 43: 219-28. 10.1177/000331979204300307View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannoukas AD, Lapropoulos N, Burke P, Katsamouris A, Nicolaides AN: Calf deep venous thrombosis: a review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995, 10: 398-404. 10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80161-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Meissner MH: Duplex follow-up of patients with DVT: does it have clinical significance? Semin Vasc Surg 2001, 14: 215-21. 10.1053/svas.2001.25493View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mattos MA, Melendres G, Sumner DS, Hood DB, Barkmeier LD, Hodgson KJ, Ramsey DE: Prevalence and distribution of calf vein thromboses in patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a color-flow duplex study. J Vasc Surg 1996, 24: 738-44. 10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70006-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Masuda EM, Kessler DM, Kistner RL, Eklof B, Sato DT: The natural history of calf vein thrombosis: lysis of thrombi and development of reflux. J Vasc Surg 1998, 28: 67-74. 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70201-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van Ramshorst B, van Bemmelen PS, Hoeneveld H, Faber JAJ, Eikelboom BC: Thrombus regression in deep venous thrombosis. Quantification of spontaneous thrombolysis with duplex scanning. Circulation 1992, 86: 414-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Caps MT, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Meissner MH, Strandness DE Jr: Venous valvular reflux in veins not involved at the time of acute deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 1995, 22: 524-31. 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70031-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meissner MH, Caps MT, Bergelin RO, Manzo RA, Strandness DE Jr: Propagation, rethrombosis and new thrombus formation after acute deep venous thrombosis. J Vas Surg 1995, 22: 558-67. 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70038-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Haenen JH, Janssen MCH, Brakkee AJM, van Langen H, Wollersheim H, de Boo TM, Skotnicki SH, Thien T: Venous reflux has limited effect on calf muscle pump dysfunction in post-thrombotic patients. Clin Sci 2000, 98: 449-454. 10.1042/CS19990215View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosfors S, Norén A, Hjertberg R, Persson L, Lillthors K, Törngren S: A 16-year haemodynamic follow-up of women with pregnancy-related medically treated iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001, 22: 448-55. 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1499View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Frulla M, Marchiori A, Bernardi E, Tormene D, Mosena L, Pagnan A, Girolami A: Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141: 249-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ, Roussin A, Desmarais S, Joyal F, Kassis J, Solymoss S, Desjardins L, Lamping DL, Johri M, Ginsberg JS: Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149: 698-707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolbach DN, Neumann HAM, Prins MH: Definition of the post-thrombotic syndrome, differences between existing classifications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005, 30: 404-14. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahn SR, Partsch H, Vedantham S, Prandoni P, Kearon C: Definition of post-thrombotic syndrome of the leg for use in clinical investigations: a recommendation for standardization. J Thromb Haemost 2009, 7: 879-83. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03294.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lonner JH, Frank J, McGuire K, Lotke PA: Postthrombotic syndrome after asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis following total knee and hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2006, 35: 469-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS: The post-thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research. Blood Rev 2002, 16: 155-65. 10.1016/S0268-960X(02)00008-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Giannoukas AD, Labropoulos N, Michaels JA: Compression with or without early ambulation in the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006, 32: 217-21. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS: Relationship between deep venous thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2006, 164: 17-24. 10.1001/archinte.164.1.17View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rosfors et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement