Skip to main content

Apixaban anti-Xa level monitoring in treatment of acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis for patient on chronic hemodialysis: a case report

Abstract

Background

Patients on dialysis are at higher risk of major bleeding and recurrent thrombosis creating acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment challenges. DOACs represent an interesting option but there are concerns of bioaccumulation and increased bleeding risk. Anti-Xa trough levels may be used to monitor for bioaccumulation but there is little data.

Case presentation

We describe a case, a 51 yo female, 36 kg on hemodialysis with a provoked acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in whom body habitus and calciphylaxis contraindicated the use of standard therapy. She received apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. The apixaban anti-Xa trough levels were measured weekly 12 h after the morning dose and ranged from 58 to 84 ng/mL, similar to expected levels with normal renal function. There were no adverse events in the 3 months follow-up.

Conclusions

We saw no evidence of bioaccumulation indicating a potential role for low dose apixaban for acute VTE in dialysis patients.

Background

Initiation of anticoagulation in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and on chronic hemodialysis, who develop a venous thromboembolic event (VTE), is challenging since the rate of recurrent thrombosis and major bleeding are increased [1]. Ideally, when judged safe, treatment in such patients would avoid inpatient admission as for most others with acute VTE [2, 3]. Warfarin use in patients under chronic hemodialysis is associated with calciphylaxis and a high bleeding rate, while INR monitoring shows unsatisfactory time in therapeutic range [4,5,6]. Adjusted doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with anti-Xa monitoring is less than ideal due to parenteral administration and the risk of sub optimal management considering there is no standard LMWH protocol in patients with ESRD [7]. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent an interesting option but there is concern over bioaccumulation which could increase bleeding risk [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Despite the absence of a standardized therapeutic range, anti-Xa trough levels are often measured to monitor potential bioaccumulation and thus, used for safety surveillance [15]. Apixaban has a potential favorable profile in ESRD and is allowed in this population for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation [16]. However, for VTE treatment, apixaban in ESRD or dialysis is not yet recommended [2, 17]. Nevertheless, in specific circumstances, apixaban might be the best option for VTE management in ESRD and dialysis. We describe a case of a 51 yo female, 36 kg, on chronic hemodialysis with a provoked acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis treated with apixaban.

Case presentation

A 51-year-old woman was seen in consultation for right arm discomfort and edema (Fig. 1). She had a past medical history of multiple bronchiectasis infections in context of congenital ectodermal dysplasia. Recurrent sepsis led to acute kidney injuries and eventually to anuric ESRD. She required hemodialysis 3 times a week, currently through using a right radiocephalic arteriovenous (AV) fistula, for almost 25 years. A renal transplant had failed immediately, 15 years prior. She had a right brachiocephalic vein stenosis, previously stented, and a suspicion of breast calciphylaxis diagnosed 3 years earlier. Her weight was 36 kg (BMI of 12) and she had negligible subcutaneous fat.

Fig. 1
figure1

Right arm edema

A right upper extremity ultrasound revealed a segmental nonocclusive thrombus in the lower part of the right internal jugular vein (IJV). She then had an angiogram and was diagnosed with a severe brachiocephalic vein in-stent stenosis and a moderate stenosis along the juxta-anastomotic cephalic vein fistula. Balloon dilatations of both stenosis were done but the intervention on the stent was complicated by a small focal contained rupture, which was again balloon dilated to ensure hemostasis. Soon after the intervention, the patient was seen at the thrombosis clinic. She reported improvement of her right arm symptoms and the initially described right nonocclusive IJV thrombosis was thought to be chronic. Surveillance by repeat ultrasound 1 week later without anticoagulation was chosen as initial management.

The next ultrasound reported interval progression of the known thrombus in the IJV (now occlusive) and nonocclusive extension into the subclavian vein. The stent was still patent. The patient was reporting worsening pain and swelling over the right side of her neck and her right arm for the last week. As such we diagnosed an acute right upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, most likely provoked by the initial flow disturbance caused by the in-stent stenosis and thereafter by the angiographic intervention.

She was treated as an outpatient with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. Apixaban was taken at 10 am and 10 pm, while dialysis treatments were scheduled at 6 pm. At her 1 week follow up visit, the pain and swelling were improved. Over 4 weeks, apixaban anti-Xa levels were measured on dialysis days 8 h (i.e. 6 pm, before dialysis) and 12 h after the morning dose (i.e. trough levels, obtained at 10 pm, after dialysis and before the next dose). Anti-Xa were obtained using a CS-2000i (Siemens) analyzer with Innovance heparin reagent (Siemens) and calibrated by a STA®-Apixaban Calibrator kit (Diagnostica Stago, working range: 20–500 ng/mL). Surveillance ultrasound done 1 and 5 weeks after treatment initiation revealed stability of the upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and patency of the stent.

Over 4 weeks, the anti-Xa trough levels ranged from 58 to 84 ng/mL, while levels obtained before dialysis, i.e. 8 h after the morning dose, were 92–135 ng/mL. Monitoring was not continued up to the end of the treatment considering there was no trend of anti-Xa levels to increase overtime. There was no concomitant medication with significant apixaban interactions and liver function was normal. These range of anti-Xa levels are similar to what would be expected as a trough level in patients with preserved renal function. There were no adverse events in the 3 months after anticoagulation initiation.

Discussion

This patient with an acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis was considered with a high risk of bleeding because of her weight of 36 kg and her ESRD under chronic dialysis. VTE needed to be treated to prevent pulmonary embolism but also to preserve her right radiocephalic AV fistula function, as interrupted hemodialysis treatment is associated with increased hospitalizations and mortality [18]. Due to a lack of subcutaneous fat for safe injections and her history of calciphylaxis, we were reluctant to use low molecular weight heparin and warfarin [6, 19].

Apixaban was chosen mainly by extrapolation of observational data from atrial fibrillation literature [16, 20]. A network meta-analysis suggest apixaban might be associated with a lower major bleeding risk compared to warfarin and others DOACs in dialysis [21]. However, there is no randomized controlled trial yet validating such results [22]. Data about acute VTE treatment with apixaban in dialysis are more scarce and limited, but seems reassuring [23,24,25,26,27]. There are also some favorable small cases series in which dialysis patients with calciphylaxis were treated with apixaban for VTE treatment [28, 29]. None report anti-Xa monitoring in these scenarios and variable doses were used.

The optimal apixaban dose in hemodialysis is unknown, but we used the lowest dose to avoid potential bioaccumulation and bleeding in the context of ESRD and an extremely low body weight. A pharmacokinetic study looked at potential bioaccumulation of apixaban at steady state in 7 hemodialysis patients. Anti-Xa trough level after 2.5 mg twice daily dose measured on day 1 and 8 showed an increase of trough level from 45 to 132 ng/mL, but with same drug exposure (i.e. area under the concentration-time curve) as patients with preserved kidney function taking a 5 mg twice daily dose. Only 4% of the medication was said to be removed by dialysis. However, apixaban 5 mg given twice daily in hemodialysis led to significant bioaccumulation [8]. The relationship of anti-Xa levels and outcomes with DOACs are unknown since no outcome study has been based on anti-Xa levels. Only one case report mentions monitoring anti-Xa levels with apixaban in a dialysis patient. However, it was in context of atrial fibrillation and the anti-Xa levels were measured without apixaban calibration, meaning it was impossible to interpret [30].

We also aimed for a shorter 6-week treatment course considering uncertainty about risk-benefit balance in this patient. The optimal duration of treatment for a provoked VTE in ESRD and on dialysis patients is unknown. Management needs to be adapted in exceptional circumstances where balance between risk and benefit is precarious.

The apixaban anti-Xa trough levels obtained over 4 weeks using the 2.5 mg twice daily dose (58 to 84 ng/mL) are in line with the recognized on-treatment range in patients with preserved renal function [17]. Since apixaban is minimally impacted by dialysis and the anti-Xa levels obtained before it would still have been reassuring as potential trough, it is unlikely that elimination of apixaban by hemodialysis has resulted in false reassuring anti-Xa trough levels. The outcomes in the 3 months after anticoagulation initiation were favorable. However, caution is advised since safety and efficacy of DOACs for VTE treatment in such patients (i.e. in hemodialysis with low body weight, calciphylaxis and with the presence of AV fistula and a brachiocephalic vein stent) has not been established. A study addressing the question in this high risk and too often excluded population is greatly needed. As far as we know, this is the first publication of apixaban anti-Xa level monitoring in treatment of acute VTE for a patient on chronic hemodialysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we saw no evidence of bioaccumulation. This indicates a potential role for low dose apixaban for acute venous thromboembolism in patients on dialysis.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ESRD:

End stage renal disease

VTE:

Venous thromboembolic event

LMWH:

Low molecular weight heparin

DOAC:

Direct oral anticoagulant

AV:

Arteriovenous

IJV:

Internal jugular vein

References

  1. 1.

    Molnar AO, Bota SE, McArthur E, Lam NN, Garg AX, Wald R, et al. Risk and complications of venous thromboembolism in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33:874–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149:315–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Roy PM, Corsi DJ, Carrier M, Theogene A, de Wit C, Dennie C, et al. Net clinical benefit of hospitalization versus outpatient management of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:685–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jun M, James MT, Manns BJ, Quinn RR, Ravani P, Tonelli M, et al. The association between kidney function and major bleeding in older adults with atrial fibrillation starting warfarin treatment: population based observational study. BMJ. 2015;350:h246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h246.

  5. 5.

    Yang F, Hellyer JA, Than C, Ullal AJ, Kaiser DW, Heidenreich PA, et al. Warfarin utilisation and anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Heart. 2017;103:818–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nigwekar SU, Thadhani R, Brandenburg VM. Calciphylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1704–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, Samama MM. Parenteral anticoagulants - antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e24S–43S.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mavrakanas TA, Samer CF, Nessim SJ, Frisch G, Lipman ML. Apixaban pharmacokinetics at steady state in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2241–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    De Vriese AS, Caluwé R, Bailleul E, De Bacquer D, Borrey D, Van Vlem B, et al. Dose-finding study of rivaroxaban in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dias C, Moore KT, Murphy J, Ariyawansa J, Smith W, Mills RM, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of single-dose rivaroxaban in chronic hemodialysis. Am J Nephrol. 2016;43:229–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Parasrampuria DA, Marbury T, Matsushima N, Chen S, Wickremasingha PK, He L, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of edoxaban in end-stage renal disease subjects undergoing haemodialysis. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113:719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang X, Tirucherai G, Marbury TC, Wang J, Chang M, Zhang D, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56:628–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chang M, Yu Z, Shenker A, Wang J, Pursley J, Byon W, et al. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56:637–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wilson JAS, Goralski KB, Soroka SD, Morrison M, Mossop P, Sleno L, et al. An evaluation of oral dabigatran etexilate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:901–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Samuelson BT, Cuker A. Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants. Blood Rev. 2017;31:77–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:104–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Canada Co. ELIQUIS® (apixaban tablets) Product Monograph. Montreal: Pfizer Canada Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb; 2019.

  18. 18.

    Obialo CI, Hunt WC, Bashir K, Zager PG. Relationship of missed and shortened hemodialysis treatments to hospitalization and mortality: observations from a US dialysis network. Clin Kidney J. 2012;5:315–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tsapatsaris NP. Low-dose heparin. A cause of hematoma of rectus abdominis. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:597–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Siontis KC, Zhang X, Eckard A, Bhave N, Schaubel DE, He K, et al. Outcomes associated with apixaban use in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 2018;138:1519–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuno T, Takagi H, Ando T, Sugiyama T, Miyashita S, Valentin N, et al. Oral anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation on long-term Hemodialysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:273–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Königsbrügge O, Ay C. Atrial fibrillation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: magnitude of the problem and new approach to oral anticoagulation. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019;3:578–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Reed D, Palkimas S, Hockman R, Abraham S, Le T, Maitland H. Safety and effectiveness of apixaban compared to warfarin in dialysis patients. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018;2:291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Steuber TD, Shiltz DL, Cairns AC, Ding Q, Binger KJ, Courtney JR. A Multicenter analysis of factors associated with Apixaban-related bleeding in hospitalized patients with end-stage renal disease on Hemodialysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2017;51:954–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sarratt SC, Nesbit R, Moye R. Safety outcomes of Apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with end-stage renal disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2017;51:445–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schafer JH, Casey AL, Dupre KA, Staubes BA. Safety and efficacy of Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52:1078–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Stanton BE, Barasch NS, Tellor KB. Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with severe renal impairment. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:412–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Garza-Mayers AC, Shah R, Sykes DB, Nigwekar SU, Kroshinsky D. The successful use of apixaban in dialysis patients with calciphylaxis who require anticoagulation: a retrospective analysis. Am J Nephrol. 2018;48:168–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    King BJ, El-Azhary RA, MT ME, Shields RC, RD MB, JT MC, et al. Direct oral anticoagulant medications in calciphylaxis. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56:1065–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kufel WD, Zayac AS, Lehmann DF, Miller CD. Clinical application and Pharmacodynamic monitoring of Apixaban in a patient with end-stage renal disease requiring chronic Hemodialysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:e166–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G.R. received a grant funding from la Fondation Québécoise pour le progrès de la Médecine Interne: Bourse René-Roux for his fellowship in adult thrombosis medicine.

Funding

No funding was obtained.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to writing of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Roberge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Exempted from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board.

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

GR has received honoraria from BMS/Pfizer, Bayer and Servier. PW has received honoraria and grant support from BMS/Pfizer and Bayer Healthcare, and honoraria from Medscape, Servier, Janssen and Sanofi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberge, G., Wells, P.S. Apixaban anti-Xa level monitoring in treatment of acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis for patient on chronic hemodialysis: a case report. Thrombosis J 19, 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00277-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Apixaban
  • Anti-Xa
  • Dialysis, end-stage renal disease