Skip to main content

Practical approach to thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis: a narrative review

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia frequently occurs in patients with sepsis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) may be a possible cause of thrombocytopenia owing to its high prevalence and association with poor outcomes; however, it is important to keep the presence of other diseases in mind in sepsis practice. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), which is characterized by thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and complement-mediated HUS, is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and organ damage. TMA has become widely recognized in recent years because of the development of specific treatments. Previous studies have reported a remarkably lower prevalence of TMA than DIC; however, its epidemiology is not well defined, and there may be cases in which TMA is not correctly diagnosed, resulting in poor outcomes. Therefore, it is important to differentiate DIC from TMA. Nevertheless, differentiating between DIC and TMA remains a challenge as indicated by previous reports that most patients with TMA can be diagnosed as DIC using the universal coagulation scoring system. Several algorithms to differentiate sepsis-related DIC from TMA have been suggested, contributing to improving the care of septic patients with thrombocytopenia; however, it may be difficult to apply these algorithms to patients with coexisting DIC and TMA, which has recently been reported. This review describes the disease characteristics, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment, of DIC, TMA, and other diseases with thrombocytopenia and proposes a novel practical approach flow, which is characterized by the initiation of the diagnosis of TMA in parallel with the diagnosis of DIC. This practical flow also refers to the longitudinal diagnosis and treatment flow with TMA in mind and real clinical timeframes. In conclusion, we aim to widely disseminate the results of this review that emphasize the importance of incorporating consideration of TMA in the management of septic DIC. We anticipate that this practical new approach for the diagnostic and treatment flow will lead to the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of complex cases, improve patient outcomes, and generate new epidemiological evidence regarding TMA.

Background

Thrombocytopenia is a relatively common complication in patients with sepsis. In septic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), marked coagulation activation causes multiple microfibrin thrombi within the systemic microvasculature. As the condition progresses, platelets are consumed along with coagulation factors, resulting in thrombocytopenia [1, 2]. In addition, recent studies have revealed that platelet activation occurs along with coagulation activation, and that platelets activated together with neutrophils accumulate in the lungs and liver, resulting in a decrease in platelets [3, 4]. Owing to these effects, septic DIC is often complicated by thrombocytopenia. However, immunothrombosis is the primary underlying cause of thrombocytopenia in patients with infectious diseases, which plays a physiological role in preventing systemic pathogen dissemination Moreover, not all sepsis cases result in pathological coagulopathy, namely, DIC. Therefore, we should note that thrombocytopenia may occur in patients with sepsis even in conditions other than DIC. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is pathologically diagnosed based on three symptoms: thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), and organ damage [5]. It is a relatively rare disease with a potentially poor prognosis without early intervention, and is difficult to differentiate from DIC [6]. Azoulay et al. reported that although physicians examine an average of three TMA patients per year in the intensive care unit (ICU), a number of them are incorrectly diagnosed upon admission [7].

Many clinicians attribute sepsis-induced DIC as the cause of thrombocytopenia in ICU patients; upon examining the infection, the use of antibiotics will be subsequently considered. If the condition is severe, platelet transfusion, heparin administration, and, in some countries including Japan, recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) or antithrombin treatment may be considered [8]. However, improving TMA using these treatments remains difficult. Although rare, TMA may coexist with septic DIC. If TMA cannot be identified, this may result to poor patient outcomes.

This review outlined the epidemiology and pathophysiology of DIC. Subsequently, we explored TMA, which is a representative condition of septic thrombocytopenia without DIC. We compared the similarities and differences between DIC and TMA and proposed a new practical approach to simultaneously diagnose these two conditions. Additionally, thrombocytopenia is associated with various severe diseases and pathological conditions other than TMA and DIC. These include hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), characterized by excessive inflammatory responses; emerging infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); chronic conditions such as liver cirrhosis; and treatment-related complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Although these diseases and conditions cause thrombocytopenia through various mechanisms, they are commonly encountered in the intensive care unit, manifesting alongside or mimicking sepsis, and significantly affect patient outcomes. This article provides a comprehensively review of these diseases and their associated pathological conditions.

Epidemiology

Thrombocytopenia is a common disorder in patients requiring intensive care, which account for 25–55% of patients admitted to the ICU [9] and 50% of those admitted to the ICU after surgery [10]. Thrombocytopenia can be attributed to DIC, and TMA including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS); of which, DIC is the most common, with sepsis-associated DIC reported at 9–19% of thrombocytopenia cases [11]. Although many studies on thrombocytopenia have been published, reports on the incidence of thrombocytopenia due to TMA, are scarce.

In previous studies, the incidence of thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis ranged from 37.5–83.5% [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, most of the studies used data from a single or two centers, and TMA was diagnosed in only one study. The number of patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia due to DIC and TMA reported in previously published papers is summarized in Table 1. Of the eight papers, two were on neonates or children, and six were on adults. Among the eight studies reporting a case of thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis, five attributed thrombocytopenia to DIC and one to TMA. Sevketoglu et al. [19] reported a diagnosis of TTP; however, the total number of patients with sepsis was unknown as the population comprised patients hospitalized for thrombocytopenia with sepsis. Notably, only one of the eight studies reported thrombocytopenia due to both DIC and TMA.

Table 1 Number of patients with sepsis, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and thrombotic microangiopathy in reviewed articles

DIC

Pathology

DIC is characterized by intravascular activation of coagulation and excessive thrombin generation, which deteriorates with the impairment of anticoagulant pathways, resulting in simultaneous widespread microvascular thrombosis, leading to organ ischemia and multiple organ dysfunction [20,21,22]. This subsequently consumes platelets and coagulation factors, leading to severe bleeding at various sites [23]. DIC is subdivided into fibrinolytic and hypofibrinolytic phenotypes [24]. In the fibrinolytic phenotype, which occurs during trauma in the early phase and hematological malignancies, the underlying disease of DIC induces excessive hyperfibrinolysis by a mechanism other than secondary fibrinolysis to hypercoagulation, contributing to massive bleeding [25]. Sepsis is a representative disease that develops in the hypofibrinolytic phenotype, in which the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) induced by inflammation suppresses fibrinolysis, further aggravating ischemic organ dysfunction [26]. The concept that excessive immunothrombosis-forming intravascular thrombi can lead to DIC has been established recently [27]. Immunothrombosis has some functions on host defense, including pathogen recognition, pathogen compartmentalization and trapping, prevention of pathogen spreading and invasion by forming microvascular thrombus, and activated neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which play important roles in immunothrombosis formation [27]. Histones, the main component of NETs, promote further NETs release. NETs and histones have been shown to induce the pathomechanisms of DIC, including procoagulant, inflammatory, hypofibrinolytic, and cytotoxic effects, and DIC is viewed as a dysregulated inflammatory coagulofibrinolytic response resulting from the synergistic effects of NETs and histones [28, 29]. Immunothrombosis also indicates the pathways for the activation of platelets [27]. Platelet activation involves the hemostatic and immune receptor-mediated pathways as the cells’ initial response to infection. The hemostatic receptors, Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa and GPIb, are involved in platelet activation by interacting with the fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (vWF), respectively. The immunoreceptor FcγRIIa interacts with pathogen-bound immunoglobulin G, and toll-like receptors interact with pathogens, both of which play important roles in platelet aggregation [30].

DIC diagnosis

An accurate diagnosis of DIC requires evidence of the presence of an intravascular fibrin clot; however, this is not clinically realistic. As there is no gold standard for DIC diagnosis, the use of scoring systems is recommended [31]. Sets of DIC diagnostic criteria have been proposed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) [22], the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) [32], and the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine (JAAM) [33], which consist of several coagulation-fibrinolysis markers. The latest set of DIC criteria was proposed by the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH) [34, 35] (Table 2). Although there is no gold standard for DIC diagnosis, the DIC scoring system plays an important role in selecting patients who require treatment for coagulation-fibrinolysis abnormalities [36].

Table 2 Criteria for diagnosing DIC

The two sets of DIC criteria were composed of similar coagulation-fibrinolysis markers as the ISTH DIC criteria were based on the JMHW DIC criteria [36]. The ISTH DIC criteria are used internationally, whereas both the JAAM and ISTH DIC criteria are clinically applied in the treatment of sepsis in Japan [8]. The JAAM DIC criteria have higher sensitivity than the ISTH DIC criteria, and can diagnose earlier stages of DIC [36]. Additionally, the JAAM DIC and ISTH criteria had been reported to have a high sensitivity and specificity for patient death, respectively [37].

A recent study suggested that the screening and diagnosis of DIC may reduce mortality in patients with sepsis [38], implying that interventions for coagulation abnormalities may contribute to the improvement of outcomes in patients with sepsis.

DIC treatment

Based on the importance of coagulation disorders in the pathomechanisms of sepsis, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to examine the efficacy of anticoagulant therapies, while all studies have failed to find a survival benefit of anticoagulant therapies. Based on these results, countries such as the United States and Europe do not administer anticoagulants to patients with sepsis. However, these studies did not specifically focus on patients with sepsis and DIC, but rather included the overall sepsis population. The aforementioned studies regarded physiological immunothrombosis and pathological DIC as the same entity in terms of coagulation abnormalities underlying sepsis [39]. Importantly, a meta-analysis of RCTs on the efficacy of anticoagulant therapies indicated that it showed no benefit on the survival rate in cohorts of overall sepsis and sepsis with any mildly deranged coagulofibrinolytic markers, but showed a survival benefit in the cohort with confirmed DIC [40]. These results are supported by previous post-hoc analyses of the other RCTs [41, 42]. In some countries, including Japan, DIC has been classified as a pathological coagulopathy in septic conditions; and the DIC working group of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG) conducted meta-analyses employing RCTs including septic patients with DIC based on this evidence and suggested antithrombin replacement therapy and administration of rhTM [8]. Meanwhile, the Sepsis Coagulopathy Asahi Recombinant LE Thrombomodulin (SCARLET) failed to determine the efficacy of rhTM in patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy, which was defined as PT-international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.4, platelet count of 30–150 × 109/L, or a decrease in platelet count > 30% within 24 h [43]. However, coagulation dysfunction defined by sepsis-associated coagulopathy may be milder than DIC, and modification of enrollment criteria was suggested immediately after the publication of SCARLET [44]. Recent studies have repeatedly focused on the importance of patient selection for anticoagulant therapies according to disease severity in addition to “sepsis with DIC” [45,46,47,48,49].

TMA

TMAs are a group of disorders characterized by MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and organ damage [50, 51]. The pathological features as vascular damage include arteriolar and capillary thrombosis with abnormalities in the endothelium and vessel walls [52]. Laboratory findings that may suggest TMA include thrombocytopenia and evidence of MAHA, including decreased hemoglobin and haptoglobin levels; increased reticulocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, and total bilirubin levels; and the presence of schistocytes [50, 53]. Coagulation abnormalities, such as prolonged prothrombin time and increased fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, are not typically observed in TMA [53]. There are several types of TMA including TTP, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS), complement-mediated HUS (CM-HUS), secondary TMA, and as a comorbid in critical illness [54].

Factors such as medication and pregnancy can cause TMA, as in the case of secondary TMA. The treatment of TMA for these conditions involved the removal of the cause. In contrast, patients with a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motifs 13 (ADAMTS13) deficiency or complement gene mutations may clinically manifest TMA during pregnancy, surgery, or inflammatory diseases. In this case, it is not only necessary to remove the cause but also to undergo disease-specific treatment [52].

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

TTP is the most frequently reported disorder among TMAs. Many patients with TTP present with a triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolysis, and neurological abnormalities. Some patients may also present with fever and kidney abnormalities, referred to as pentads. However, neither the triad nor the pentad are reliable for diagnosing TTP. Practically, it is necessary to suspect TTP in cases of thrombocytopenia and MAHA [55].

ADAMTS13 deficiency is the main pathogenesis of TTP, which is attributed to genetic mutations and autoimmune inhibitors. TTP is diagnosed with plasma ADAMTS13 activity levels <10% [55, 56]. However, ADAMTS13 test results are not always immediately available. Thus, the PLASMIC score [57] can be easily calculated using commonly accessible findings and is useful for the risk assessment of ADAMTS13 activity <10%. It can be used as an adjunctive reference for reasonably initiating treatment while awaiting the ADAMTS13 test results. TTP is classified as congenital/hereditary or acquired/immune. Congenital TTP can develop into adulthood. Although ADAMTS13 activity is persistently low, some patients remain asymptomatic until a trigger precipitates symptoms [55].

The treatment of immune TTP typically involves plasma exchange (PEX) to remove ADAMTS13 inhibitors and supplement normal plasma [58]. In addition to PEX, glucocorticoids, rituximab, caplacizumab, and recombinant ADAMTS13 ( currently in phase 3 clinical trials) are considered treatment options for TTP [56]. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against CD20 that prevents immune TTP relapse [59]. Caplacizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment that targets the A1 domain of vWF, promptly blocks platelet-vWF interactions, and prevents microvascular thrombosis in the arterioles and capillaries. The optimal clinical use of caplacizumab is yet to be determined; however, it is likely to be highly effective when administered early in the disease [59]. The treatment options for hereditary TTP include plasma infusion or recombinant ADAMTS13, a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late 2023. In phase 3 and 3b studies, treatment with recombinant ADAMTS13 rapidly resolved the acute TTP events and increased the platelet counts in patients with congenital TTP without causing serious adverse events [60]. This is useful as it can supplement the deficient enzyme without exposing the patient to donor plasma [61].

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic-uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS)

HUS can be classified into two types: typical HUS, which is accompanied by diarrhea and atypical HUS, which is not. Most typical HUS cases are caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) bacteria, with E. coli O157:H7 being the most common and predominant pathogen worldwide [62]. Shiga toxin can directly damage the endothelium due to its prothrombotic effects and stimulation of endothelial cell release by ultralarge von Willebrand multimers. Consequently, this reaction activates platelets, leading to aggregation and occlusion of the microvasculature [50]. STEC-HUS is the most frequent type of TMA and is most commonly observed in children under 5 years of age, although it can also occur in adults [50], Additionally, 15% of people with symptoms of STEC infection develop HUS [62]. Symptoms of STEC infection, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting, typically appear 2–12 days (median, 3 days) after bacterial ingestion. At symptom onset, laboratory test results for TMA are usually negative [62]. Renal damage is common in patients with STEC-HUS. Severe cases may also present with neurological symptoms, such as mental disturbances, seizures, and coma [63].

A stool sample is required to test for STEC infection. Rectal swabs were used if stool samples were unavailable. Sorbitol-MacConkey agar is a type of media used to isolate E. coli O157:H7 [64]. However, the results of stool culture tests may be unreliable as the bacteria may only be present in the stool for a few days. Antibodies against STEC lipopolysaccharides in the serum can persist for several weeks and may help diagnose STEC infection [65].

Treatment for STEC-HUS involves managing of symptoms, such as hemodynamic and renal management. Moreover, approximately 60% of patients require dialysis during the acute phase [66]. Antibiotics are thought to increase the risk of HUS and are, not recommended for use in STEC infections. However, research on this topic is mixed, with some studies suggesting that antibiotics increase the risk of HUS, while others found no effect of HUS with antibiotic use [67]. There is no clear evidence that PEX is beneficial for the treatment of STEC-HUS [62]. The American Society for Apheresis advises that the role of PEX in STEC-HUS treatment is uncertain, and the decision to use PEX should be made on a case-by-case basis [50, 68]. However, it can be difficult to distinguish STEC-HUS from other types of TMA that may respond to PEX, such as CM-HUS and TTP, as they manifest similar gastrointestinal symptoms. Thus, PEX may be used in some patients with STEC-HUS.

Complement-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome (CM-HUS)

Atypical HUS (aHUS) does not cause diarrhea. It is often caused by genetic or acquired defects in the regulation of complement activation, known as complement-mediated HUS (CM-HUS) [69, 70]. CM-HUS can occur in children and adults. It is caused by mutations in complement control proteins (such as Factor H, Factor I, membrane co-factor protein (MCP), and thrombomodulin (THBD)), gain-of-function mutations that make C3 and Factor B less susceptible to inactivation, or antibodies that attack specific complement components (such as Factor H). Uncontrolled complement activation results in the activation of platelets and microvascular endothelial injury, leading to widespread microthrombosis and the clinical phenotype of CM-HUS [71].

Organ damage is often characterized by significant kidney injury. Clinical manifestations of CM-HUS include the common triad of clinical features of TMAs as well as extrarenal symptoms, including neurologic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal involvement. The neurological symptoms are the most common non-renal manifestations, occurring in 8-48% of cases. These symptoms include seizures, vision loss, hemiparesis, headaches, altered consciousness, and hallucinations [72]. Gastrointestinal complications, including diarrhea, are common in CM-HUS. Diarrhea is classically associated with STEC-HUS but is also observed in approximately 50% of patients with CM-HUS [72]. In CM-HUS, triggering events (such as diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, and pregnancy) have been documented in 39-70% of cases. These events are often considered as triggers rather than causes of the disease [73, 74].

Certain genetic mutations or autoantibodies against Factor H may be used to diagnose CM-HUS. However, these tests may not be useful for making acute treatment decisions, as test results may not be available for months, and mutations are only found in about half of the patients diagnosed with CM-HUS [71].

Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the complement component C5 to stop abnormal activation of the complement pathway, decreasing damage to the endothelium and thus the organ dysfunction [75]. Recently, ravulizumab was reported to be non-inferior to eculizumab, with the added benefit of less frequent administration. These may be superior to plasma therapy for the treatment of CM-HUS because they can directly turn off abnormal complement activity [75, 76]. PEX removes autoantibodies or mutated circulating complement regulators and replaces defective complement regulators. PEX is accepted as the first-line therapy for cases caused by anti-Factor H antibodies; however, its optimal role in cases with genetic abnormalities has not been established. Moreover, PEX is recommended for patients with CM-HUS while the type of TMA is being investigated [68]. Hemodialysis is also required for severe acute kidney injury, which often leads to end-stage renal disease in patients with CM-HUS. Early initiation of eculizumab therapy is associated with greater improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate, suggesting that timely diagnosis and treatment with eculizumab are important for patient outcomes [71, 72, 77].

Secondary TMA

Secondary TMA is a broad concept that has not yet been well-defined. Several factors may contribute to the development of TMA [78]. We focused on common etiologies of secondary TMA, including drugs, pregnancy, and cancer [54, 78, 79].

Drug

Drug-induced TMA (DI-TMA) is caused by immune-mediated and direct toxicity [78]. In immune-mediated DI-TMA, the drug triggers the formation of antibodies against various cells, causing damage to the endothelium and platelet consumption [54]. Examples of drugs that can cause this type of DI-TMA include quinine, which causes systemic symptoms and acute kidney injury upon first exposure to the drug [80]. Meanwhile, decreased expression of VEGF may play a role in the direct toxicity of DI-TMA [54]. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus are known to cause this type of DI-TMA, which can occur either acutely or after long-term exposure [80]. The main treatment for DI-TMA is removal of the offending drug and provision of supportive care [54].

Pregnancy

Hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet count (HELLP) are part of the spectrum of preeclampsia (a condition characterized by proteinuria and hypertension) and can lead to serious maternal and neonatal morbidity and even mortality. HELLP is characterized by microangiopathic disease as evidenced by schistocytes in the peripheral smear and a negative Coombs test result. Distinguishing HELLP from pregnancy-triggered TTP or CM-HUS can be difficult. TTP or CM-HUS should be proactively considered when HELLP does not improve after prompt blood pressure control and delivery [54].

Cancer

TMA is commonly associated with two types of cancers, gastric and breast cancers, specifically mucin-producing adenocarcinomas [54]. It has been hypothesized that mucin may have a direct effect on the endothelium, perturbing the production and release of vWF. Additionally, TMA may be caused or exacerbated by direct contact between erythrocytes and circulating cancer cells and the presence of tumor emboli within small blood vessels [81]. Physicians should consider both cancer-related and chemotherapy-induced TMA in patients with cancer who present with TMA. Although up to 90% of the patients with cancer-related TMA have metastatic disease, chemotherapy-induced TMA often has minimal or no detectable malignancy. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as mytomycin, gemcitabine, and VEGF pathway inhibitors, are commonly associated with chemotherapy-induced TMA. It is important to monitor patients receiving medications associated with TMA for signs of hypertension, hematuria/proteinuria, and decreased kidney function because the classic triad of TMA symptoms may not always be present. Treatment typically involves discontinuation of the causative agent and effective blood pressure control with renin-angiotensin blockers [81].

Other critical thrombocytopenic diseases

In addition to DIC and TMA, multiple severe conditions associated with sepsis are linked with thrombocytopenia, such as haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). HLH, including hemophagocytic syndrome, is a severe hyperinflammatory syndrome driven by activated macrophages and T cells due to the impairment of natural killer and cytotoxic T cells; it causes cytopenia and organ dysfunction due to an extreme inflammatory cytokine storm and tissue damage, resulting in high mortality [82,83,84,85,86]. HLH is diagnosed according to the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria based on the following eight parameters: fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia, hemophagocytosis, low/absent natural killer cell activity, hyperferritinemia, and high soluble interleukin-2-receptor levels [87, 88]. Infections are the most prevalent triggers of HLH. Viral infections, such as the Epstein-Barr virus, are the most frequent triggers, and bacterial infections also induce HLH [82]. HLH is an important differential diagnosis in critically ill patients with sepsis, especially in those not responding to sepsis treatment [87, 88]. Intravascular lymphomas (IVLs) can trigger HLH. An IVL is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by an intravascular proliferation of malignant lymphocytes, an aggressive clinical course, and a short prognosis [89]. The Asian variant of IVL presents a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, with the etiology not solely attributed to HLH as a clinical manifestation (76% vs. 29%), compared with the variant prevalent in Western countries [90]. As it mimics sepsis, carefully distinguishing IVLs from septic DIC is necessary.

COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), induces thrombocytopathy, characterized by platelet hyperactivation, thrombocytopenia, and impaired platelet reactivity. Thrombocytopathy is a prominent feature of COVID-19, contributing to excessive thrombus formation via platelet hyperactivation and augmented reactivity or heightened bleeding tendencies due to thrombocytopenia [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98]. Both venous and arterial thrombotic complications are commonly observed in patients with COVID-19, which is characterized by elevated D-dimer levels [99,100,101,102,103]. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) is characterized by a prothrombotic state caused by inflammation, thrombocytopenia, coagulation activation, and endotheliopathy [93,94,95,96, 98]. CAC shares common features with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and DIC, although some differences were noted between the two pathophysiologies. Excessive thrombin generation, a manifestation of DIC, has not been conclusively established. Additionally, decreased platelet count and prolonged prothrombin time are uncommon or tend to be mild in patients with COVID-19, in contrast to SIC and DIC [104,105,106,107]. These coagulofibrinolytic marker manifestations contradict the diagnoses of SIC and DIC. Iba et al. proposed diagnostic criteria specific for CAC, which are distinctly different from those for SIC and DIC [104]. Patients with COVID-19 should be diagnosed with CAC when they meet two or more of the following criteria: (1) a decrease in platelet count (less than 150×109/L), (2) an increase in D-dimer levels (more than two times the upper limit of normal), (3) a prothrombin time of >1 s or an INR of >1.2, (4) a decrease in fibrinogen levels, and (5) the presence of thrombosis. Heparin may protect organ function by exerting antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and many studies have demonstrated the benefits of heparin use in patients with COVID-19 [108, 109].

Furthermore, thrombocytopenia is a common complication of liver diseases, including cirrhosis. Thrombocytopenia is a common complication of chronic liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis. Multifactorial mechanisms contribute to the development of thrombocytopenia, including platelet sequestration commonly accompanied by hypersplenism and portal hypertension, viral-induced bone marrow suppression, autoantibodies, and decreased thrombopoietin (TPO) production [110,111,112]. Acute-on-chronic liver failure, a syndrome characterized by the acute deterioration of preexisting chronic liver disease, can occur as a result of bacterial infection, leading to multiple organ failure and high mortality [113, 114]. Bacterial infection also causes sepsis-associated liver dysfunction including hypoxic hepatitis, cholestasis, hepatocellular injury, and sclerosing cholangitis [115, 116]. Protein synthesis dysfunction due to acute or acute chronic liver failure can cause coagulopathy. Whether liver dysfunction itself can lead to DIC has been debated; however, DIC can easily develop in patients with liver failure triggered by bacterial infections [115, 117, 118]. In patients with liver failure, it is necessary to differentiate DIC or detect its concurrence by assessing the coagulofibrinolytic activity.

Additionally, when considering complications arising from the treatment of critically ill patients, there is a condition called Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) that leads to thrombocytopenia. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) stored in platelet α-granules is released at the sites of platelet activation and forms PF4-heparin complexes upon administration of heparin. B lymphocytes recognize PF4-heparin complexes and generate antibodies against these complexes (HIT antibodies) to form immunocomplexes. These immunocomplexes bind and activate platelets and monocytes via FcγRIIa receptors, followed by thrombin generation due to expression of tissue factor and microparticles [119, 120]. The clinical manifestations of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis develop 5–14 days after heparin exposure. Platelet count often shows a 30–50% decline from baseline, which is typically not associated with bleeding tendency. Thrombotic complications, such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and catheter-related thrombosis, predominantly develop in the veins rather than in the arteries [119,120,121]. The 4Ts clinical scoring system, which evaluates four features, thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, timing of onset, and exclusion of other causes, is widely used to predict HIT [122]. HIT-mimicking disorders without proximate heparin exposure have also been reported after infection and other conditions, such as “spontaneous HIT.” PF4 plays an important role in innate immunity and inflammatory responses and can interact with many polyanions, such as lipopolysaccharides and DNA [123, 124].

Relationship between DIC and TMA

Differences and similarities between DIC and TMA

Both DIC and TMA cause vascular endothelial cell injury and microvascular thrombosis, which is caused by the activation of coagulation in DIC and platelets in TMA. In other words, fibrin thrombosis occurs on the venous side of the microvessels in DIC, while platelet thrombosis occurs on the arterial side of the microvessels in TMA [6]. Thrombosis confirmed using TMA is associated with high blood pressure, which may be caused by acute kidney injury, a frequently observed organ dysfunction [125]. In contrast, patients with DIC often suffer from hypotension as a circulatory dysfunction, which is often complicated by respiratory failure.

Regarding laboratory data, prolonged PT and marked elevations in fibrin-related markers, such as soluble fibrin monomers, FDP, and D-dimer, were observed in most DIC cases, but not in TMA. In addition to thrombocytopenia, increased levels of total bilirubin and LDH caused by the development of MAHA were confirmed in patients with TMA. Importantly, DIC is diagnosed by universal coagulation scoring, whereas most patients with TMA can also be diagnosed with DIC using the DIC diagnostic criteria. Conversely, approximately 10% of patients with DIC are diagnosed with TMA [6]. Since there are specific therapies such as plasma exchange for TTP and anti-complement therapy for CM-HUS, as well as anticoagulant therapies for DIC, early differential diagnosis between DIC and TMA is important; however, DIC and TMA can coexist, and differentiating between DIC and TMA is “easier said than done”.

Differences in algorithms to differentiate sepsis-related DIC from TMA based on the disease concept of DIC

In an editorial on ICU patients with thrombocytopenia, Vincent et al. published an algorithm to rapidly differentiate DIC from TMA [11]. This algorithm first checks for the presence of MAHA and then evaluates the coagulation profile, including PT, APTT, and FDP, to differentiate DIC in patients with thrombocytopenia. Behind this diagnostic approach, we can see that DIC is not considered a treatment target and should be more focused on treating the underlying disease. In contrast, another algorithm presented by the J-SSCG2020 working group for DIC estimates coagulation abnormalities by evaluating PT or FDP to diagnose DIC, and then checks for MAHA after DIC is ruled out [126]. This initial DIC diagnosis in patients with thrombocytopenia is based on the much higher prevalence of DIC than that of TMA and the recognition of the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of DIC in Japan. The ISTH guidelines also proposed an algorithm similar to that of the J-SSCG2020, which first evaluates coagulation abnormalities [127].

Comorbidity of DIC and TMA

In thrombocytopenia and organ dysfunction, DIC is more frequent than in TMA. As mentioned previously, early differentiation and treatment are important for DIC and TMA because their treatment methods are different. DIC and TMA have similarities; however, all coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet systems are activated in DIC, and only platelets are markedly activated in TMA. However, clinicians must always consider cases in which septic DIC and TMA are comorbid [6]. Crosstalk between the complement and coagulation systems is crucial in TMA and DIC. Thus, the comorbidities of DIC and TMA have been reported. Here, we describe the association between DIC and TMA secondary to infection and/or sepsis.

Comorbidity of DIC and aHUS

DIC and CM-HUS

The dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway causes endothelial cell damage. Complement activation in patients with DIC is also well known; therefore, crosstalk between the complement and coagulation systems may be important in these patients.

Abe et al. reported a case of CM-HUS complicated by septic DIC [128]. Sepsis treatment only improved DIC, and TMA features became more prominent. Plasma exchange followed by eculizumab administration improved the TMA conditions. Genetic testing suggests that a mutation in the CFH gene may have been involved. In this case, the authors concluded that septic-DIC triggered abnormal complement activation, leading to CM-HUS.

There are some reports on the frequency of the coexistence of DIC and CM-HUS. Fujisawa et al. conducted a nationwide study of patients clinically diagnosed with CM-HUS [129]. In this study, 118 patients with CM-HUS in Japan were enrolled between 1988 and 2016. The coagulation-fibrinolysis system was evaluated by PT-INR, APTT, fibrinogen, and FDP values at the initial visit. Most patients clinically diagnosed with CM-HUS did not meet the DIC criteria. In contrast, Sakurai et al. reported 3 out of 15 (20%) CM-HUS patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for DIC by the JSTH [130]. Although these patients were classified as having the basic type, a frequency of 20% was noteworthy. In addition, the authors mentioned that the distribution of DIC scores in patients with CM-HUS indicated that they might sequentially progress to DIC. In a previous nationwide study, 75% of patients had an infection as a probable trigger for CM-HUS [129]. The possibility of DIC following CM-HUS should be considered depending on the management of the infection that triggers CM-HUS.

DIC and coagulation-mediated TMA

Thrombomodulin activates protein C and triggers the anticoagulation system. In addition, thrombomodulin activates TAFI to degrade anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a and acts as a co-factor of CFI-mediated C3b cleavage in the alternative pathway. Therefore, THBD may be associated with the coagulation and complement pathways. According to Japanese guidelines [131], THBD mutations are classified as causes of coagulation-mediated TMA.

In the first reported international registry, THBD mutations were identified in 7 of 152 (4.6%) patients with aHUS [132], a type of HUS that does not involve STEC. The condition associated with this THBD mutation is clinically aHUS, with a reported frequency of 3–5% [133,134,135]. Interestingly, only 1 in 104 (1%) patients with aHUS was identified to have a THBD variant combined with another variant in Japan [129]. Thus, the mechanisms underlying the development of aHUS, including THBD mutations, are not fully understood.

The involvement of thrombomodulin in the development of TMA and its possible role in controlling its pathogenesis are remarkably interesting. Suppression of thrombomodulin expression due to sepsis or a systemic inflammatory response may trigger TMA. The effect of thrombomodulin on transplant-related TMA has also been previously reported [136]. Further research on the etiology and therapeutic potential of thrombomodulin in TMA is required.

Comorbidity of DIC and secondary TMA

Systemic inflammatory responses, such as sepsis, pancreatitis, and trauma, decrease ADAMTS13 activity. The degree of the decline in ADAMTS13 activity varies, with some cases decreasing to below 10%, which is the diagnostic criterion for TTP. Lower ADAMTS13 activity due to sepsis is also associated with a poor prognosis [137].

The relationship between ADAMTS13 activity and organ failure has been reported in patients with septic DIC [138]. This study showed that the distribution of ADAMTS13 activity in patients with septic DIC varied widely and that 17 of 109 (15.6%) patients had extremely low (< 5%) ADAMTS13 activity. Furthermore, ADAMTS13 activity of < 20% in patients with septic DIC is associated with renal dysfunction. In another study, patients with DIC showed 60.1% ADAMTS13 activity, which was lower than that observed in patients without DIC [139]. In this study, only approximately 20% of the patients had infection as the cause of DIC, which may explain why the distribution of ADAMTS13 differed from that of septic DIC described above. Interestingly, low ADAMTS13 levels (< 56.4%) were associated with high mortality, with or without DIC. Habe et al. revealed that ADAMTS13 activity was significantly decreased in any of the patients with DIC (35.0, 19.5-51.6%), non-DIC (63.7,47.5-85.0%), TTP (undetectable, undetectable-6.3%), and aHUS (50.0,36.6-73.1%) compared to those in healthy volunteers (111.0,95.0-125.0%) (data are shown as medians,15-75 percentile). DIC patients with infectious disease showed significantly lower ADAMTS13 activity (30.0, 15.9-49.4%) than non-DIC patients with infectious disease (50.7, 36.3-68.8). DIC patients with infectious diseases also show a high vWF propeptide level, which is associated with a low survival rate [140]. In the retrospective analysis, 5 of 20 (20%) secondary TMA patients fulfilled the JSTH-DIC criteria, and two of the patients were classified into the infectious type. The results also indicate that the coexistence of DIC and TMA occurred at a certain frequency [130]. ADAMTS13 activity was decreased in these patients (45, 37.4-62.4%; median, interquartile range).

Several case reports have described cases of DIC and secondary TMA. One case report showed that Capnocytophaga canimorsus sepsis causes DIC and secondary TMA. ADAMTS13 activity on the day of admission was detected on the fifth hospital day and decreased by < 1%. Notably, no schistocytes were observed in the blood smear on the day of admission, despite the other characteristics of TMA. The patient’s condition improved after administration of fresh frozen plasma [141]. In another case of Capnocytophaga canimorsus infection followed by DIC and secondary TMA, the activity of ADAMTS13 was not reduced (77.2%). Plasma exchange started on day 5 and the patient’s condition improved [142]. Sakamaki et al. reported a case of septic DIC complicated with TMA. The patient was treated for DIC due to urinary tract infection; however, despite improvement in the coagulation system, neurological symptoms and renal dysfunction persisted. The patient was considered for TMA and underwent plasma exchange. At this point, the ADAMTS13 activity was 44% without the ADAMTS13 inhibitor. The TMA improved with plasma exchange, except for renal function, and the patient required maintenance dialysis. In this case, plasma exchange was initiated on day 7; however, elevated LDH and AKI levels were present, suggesting that TMA may have developed earlier [143].

A variety of pathogenic microorganisms are known to cause TMA, including Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, parvovirus B19, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2. The pathogenesis of infection-induced TMA is complex and includes direct endothelial injury, ADAMTS13 inhibition, complement activation, or a combination of these mechanisms [144]. Even when the diagnostic criteria for DIC are met, the coexistence or subsequent development of TMA should be noted when sepsis or a systemic inflammatory response exists.

Practical approach to thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis

A novel diagnosis and treatment flow for patients with thrombocytopenia associated with sepsis

Previous studies indicated that the prevalence of TMA is remarkably lower than that of DIC. Although interest in TMA in the field of intensive care has increased over the last decade, its epidemiology has not yet been fully evaluated. This means that due to adherence to the DIC diagnosis caused by the known high prevalence rate of DIC, some patients may be undiagnosed with TMA, resulting in mortality or severe complications. To reduce the number of such cases, we developed a novel diagnostic and treatment flow for patients with thrombocytopenia associated with sepsis (Fig. 1). The differences between this flow and those previously published [53, 127], as mentioned above (Section 6.2), are as follows: i) simultaneous implementation of DIC diagnosis and confirmation of MAHA for TMA diagnosis, ii) incorporation of specific treatment methods in the flow, and iii) longitudinal diagnosis and treatment flow of TMA with real clinical timeframes. Based on the J-SSCG 2020, the JAAM DIC scoring system [11, 145] was used for DIC diagnosis in consideration of early diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Once DIC is diagnosed (JAAM score ≥ 4), anticoagulant therapy should be considered in addition to the treatment of the underlying disease. Importantly, at the same time as the DIC diagnosis, the presence of MAHA should be confirmed to diagnose TMA. General blood test parameters such as LDH and T-bil were first checked and, if suspected, haptoglobin levels and/or the presence of schistocytes were confirmed. If TMA was suspected, the next step was to diagnose TTP and HUS. A definitive diagnosis of TTP and HUS requires ADAMTS13 activity < 10% and confirmation of the Shiga toxin-producing ability of E. coli isolated from the patient’s stool, respectively. However, it may be important to not hesitate in initiating PEX according to clinical symptoms as these test results are not immediately available. Consultation with specialists, such as hematologists or nephrologists, should also be considered. When TMA is suspected, secondary TMA may be diagnosed on the basis of the patient’s background. In such cases, supportive therapy and treatment for the underlying primary disease should be provided. If ADAMTS13 activity is < 10%, TTP is diagnosed and administration of caplacizumab is considered in addition to PEX. If HUS is diagnosed, supportive care would be continued until the patient condition improves. If neither HUS nor TTP is diagnosed, the possibility of secondary TMA should be considered again, as well as CM-HUS. Genetic testing is required for a definitive diagnosis of aHUS. It is sometimes necessary to proceed with the administration of anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, including eculizumab and ravulizumab, based on the patient ’s medical condition before the results of genetic testing are known, as it takes months to obtain the results. If there are no signs of MAHA and TMA appears negative, differentiation of HIT, and ITP, should be performed with careful examination of the MAHA appearance.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A novel diagnosis and treatment flow for patients with thrombocytopenia associated with sepsis. Patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia were checked for MAHA in the presence of TMA, in parallel with DIC diagnosis using the DIC scoring system. If TMA is suspected, a definitive diagnosis of HUS and TTP is made by confirmation of the Shiga toxin-producing ability of E. coli isolated from the patient’s stool and ADAMTS13 activity of < 10%, respectively, and PEX should be initiated. When TMA is suspected, secondary TMA may be diagnosed on the basis of the patient’s background. If neither HUS nor TTP is diagnosed, the possibility of CM-HUS should be considered. It is important to decide whether to administer an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody based on the patient’s medical condition before the results of genetic testing are known. If there are no signs of MAHA and TMA appears negative, differentiation of HIT, ITP, etc., should be performed with careful examination of the MAHA appearance. ADAMTS13, a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motifs 13; CAC, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy; CM-HUS, complement-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; hapt, haptoglobin; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; ITP, Immune thrombocytopenia; MAMA, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PEX, plasma exchange; rhTM, recombinant human thrombomodulin; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; US, ultrasound

Future perspective

The diagnosis and treatment flow were developed by the J-STAD study group, which consisted of experts in sepsis care in Japan. A prospective study with the cooperation of members of the J-STAD study group will be conducted to validate the clinical significance of this flow. We believe that this study will help accumulate evidence on the epidemiology, clinical course of TMA, and efficacy of new specific therapeutic agents, including eculizumab and ravulizumab for CM-HUS and caplacizumab for TTP, consequently improving outcomes in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with sepsis.

Conclusions

Amidst a high incidence rate of DIC, a sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia may consequently be undiagnosed with TMA. Sepsis may complicate the diagnosis as it can cause DIC and trigger TMA. To reduce overlooked of TMA cases, we developed a new diagnostic and treatment flow for patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia. Our flow simultaneously diagnoses DIC, confirms MAHA for TMA diagnosis, incorporates specific treatment methods for TMA, and considers real clinical timeframes for the longitudinal diagnosis and treatment of TMA. This new diagnostic and treatment flow envisioned to help patients with TMA to receive appropriate treatment and alleviate their conditions.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ADAMTS13:

A disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motifs 13

AIPF:

Acute infectious purpura fulminans

APS/CAPS:

Antiphospholipid syndrome/catastrophic APS

CAC:

COVID-19-associated coagulopathy

CM-HUS:

Complement-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome

DIC:

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

FDP:

Fibrin degradation product

HIT:

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

HLH:

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

HUS:

Hemolytic uremic syndrome

ISTH:

International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis

ITP:

Immune thrombocytopenia

JAAM:

Japanese Association of Acute Medicine

JMHW:

Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare

JSTH:

Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis

MAHA:

Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PEX:

Plasma exchange

PT-INR:

Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio

PT:

Prothrombin time

rhTM:

Recombinant human thrombomodulin

SIRS:

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

STFS:

Severe fever and thrombocytopenia syndrome

TAT:

Thrombin-antithrombin complex

TMA:

Thrombotic microangiopathy

TTP:

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

References

  1. Levi M, Ten Cate H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:586–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gando S, Levi M, Toh C-H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laursen MA, Larsen JB, Hvas A-M. Platelet function in disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review. Platelets. 2018;29:238–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kander T, Larsson A, Taune V, Schött U, Tynngård N. Assessment of haemostasis in disseminated intravascular coagulation by use of point-of-care assays and routine coagulation tests, in critically Ill patients; a prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Campistol JM, Arias M, Ariceta G, Blasco M, Espinosa L, Espinosa M, Grinyó JM, Macía M, Mendizábal S, Praga M, et al. An update for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. A consensus document. Nefrologia. 2015;35:421–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wada H, Matsumoto T, Suzuki K, Imai H, Katayama N, Iba T, Matsumoto M. Differences and similarities between disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathy. Thromb J. 2018;16:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Azoulay E, Knoebl P, Garnacho-Montero J, Rusinova K, Galstian G, Eggimann P, Abroug F, Benoit D, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Wendon J, Scully M. Expert statements on the standard of care in critically Ill adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Chest. 2017;152:424–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, Atagi K, Inoue S, Iba T, Kakihana Y, Kawasaki T, Kushimoto S, Kuroda Y, et al. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). J Intensive Care Med. 2021;9:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akca S, Haji-Michael P, de Mendonça A, Suter P, Levi M, Vincent JL. Time course of platelet counts in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:753–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali N, Auerbach HE. New-onset acute thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients: pathophysiology and diagnostic approach. J Commun Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017;7:157–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vincent JL, Castro P, Hunt BJ, Jorres A, Praga M, Rojas-Suarez J, Watanabe E. Thrombocytopenia in the ICU: disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathies-what intensivists need to know. Crit Care. 2018;22:158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Claushuis TAM, van Vught LA, Scicluna BP, Wiewel MA, Klein Klouwenberg PMC, Hoogendijk AJ, Ong DSY, Cremer OL, Horn J, Franitza M, et al. Thrombocytopenia is associated with a dysregulated host response in critically ill sepsis patients. Blood. 2016;127:3062–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ree IMC, Fustolo-Gunnink SF, Bekker V, Fijnvandraat KJ, Steggerda SJ, Lopriore E. Thrombocytopenia in neonatal sepsis: Incidence, severity and risk factors. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkata C, Kashyap R, Farmer JC, Afessa B. Thrombocytopenia in adult patients with sepsis: incidence, risk factors, and its association with clinical outcome. J Intensive Care Med. 2013;1:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li M-F, Li X-L, Fan K-L, Yu Y-Y, Gong J, Geng S-Y, Liang Y-F, Huang L, Qiu J-H, Tian X-H, et al. Platelet desialylation is a novel mechanism and a therapeutic target in thrombocytopenia during sepsis: an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bedet A, Razazi K, Boissier F, Surenaud M, Hue S, Giraudier S, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Mechanisms of thrombocytopenia during septic shock: a multiplex cluster analysis of endogenous sepsis mediators. Shock. 2018;49:641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe T, Kubo K, Izumoto S, Shimazu S, Goan A, Tanaka T, Koroki T, Saito K, Kawana R, Ochiai H. Complement activation in human sepsis is related to sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. Shock. 2020;54:198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arif SH, Ahmad I, Ali SM, Khan HM. Thrombocytopenia and bacterial sepsis in neonates. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012;28:147–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevketoglu E, Yildizdas D, Horoz OO, Kihtir HS, Kendirli T, Bayraktar S, Carcillo JA. Use of therapeutic plasma exchange in children with thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure in the Turkish thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure network. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:e354-359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Levi M, de Jonge E, van der Poll T. Sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003;16:43–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levi M, van der Poll T. Coagulation and sepsis. Thromb Res. 2017;149:38–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, Watson HG. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:24–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor FB Jr, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M. Scientific Subcommittee on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation of the International Society on T, Haemostasis: towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:1327–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gando S, Otomo Y. Local hemostasis, immunothrombosis, and systemic disseminated intravascular coagulation in trauma and traumatic shock. Crit Care. 2015;19:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wada T, Shiraishi A, Gando S, Yamakawa K, Fujishima S, Saitoh D, Kushimoto S, Ogura H, Abe T, Mayumi T, et al. Pathophysiology of Coagulopathy Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury Is Identical to That of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation With Hyperfibrinolysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:767637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gando S. Role of fibrinolysis in sepsis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013;39:392–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Engelmann B, Massberg S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:34–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alhamdi Y, Toh CH. Recent advances in pathophysiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation: the role of circulating histones and neutrophil extracellular traps. F1000Res. 2017;6:2143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gando S, Wada T. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in cardiac arrest and resuscitation. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17:1205–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cox D. Sepsis - it is all about the platelets. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1210219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wada H, Thachil J, Di Nisio M, Mathew P, Kurosawa S, Gando S, Kim HK, Nielsen JD, Dempfle CE, Levi M, et al. Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of DIC from harmonization of the recommendations from three guidelines. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:761-7.

  32. Kobayashi N, Maekawa T, Takada M, Tanaka H, Gonmori H. Criteria for diagnosis of DIC based on the analysis of clinical and laboratory findings in 345 DIC patients collected by the Research Committee on DIC in Japan. Bibl Haematol. 1983:265-275.

  33. Gando S, Iba T, Eguchi Y, Ohtomo Y, Okamoto K, Koseki K, Mayumi T, Murata A, Ikeda T, Ishikura H, et al. A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:625–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Asakura H, Takahashi H, Uchiyama T, Eguchi Y, Okamoto K, Kawasugi K, Madoiwa S, Wada H, Thrombosis DICsotJSo. Hemostasis: Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for DIC from the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Thromb J. 2016;14:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wada H, Takahashi H, Uchiyama T, Eguchi Y, Okamoto K, Kawasugi K, Madoiwa S, Asakura H, Thrombosis DICsotJSo, Hemostasis. The approval of revised diagnostic criteria for DIC from the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Thromb J. 2017;15:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gando S, Saitoh D, Ogura H, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, Araki T, Ikeda H, Kotani J, Kushimoto S, Miki Y, et al. A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Takemitsu T, Wada H, Hatada T, Ohmori Y, Ishikura K, Takeda T, Sugiyama T, Yamada N, Maruyama K, Katayama N, et al. Prospective evaluation of three different diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:40–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Umemura Y, Yamakawa K, Hayakawa M, Hamasaki T, Fujimi S. Japan Septic Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation study g: Screening itself for disseminated intravascular coagulation may reduce mortality in sepsis: a nationwide multicenter registry in Japan. Thromb Res. 2018;161:60–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ushio N, Wada T, Ono Y, Yamakawa K. Sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: an international estrangement of disease concept. Acute Med Surg. 2023;10:e00843.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Umemura Y, Yamakawa K, Ogura H, Yuhara H, Fujimi S. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in three specific populations with sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:518–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kienast J, Juers M, Wiedermann CJ, Hoffmann JN, Ostermann H, Strauss R, Keinecke HO, Warren BL, Opal SM. Treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:90–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dhainaut JF, Yan SB, Joyce DE, Pettila V, Basson B, Brandt JT, Sundin DP, Levi M. Treatment effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis with or without overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1924–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vincent JL, Francois B, Zabolotskikh I, Daga MK, Lascarrou JB, Kirov MY, Pettila V, Wittebole X, Meziani F, Mercier E, et al. Effect of a Recombinant Human Soluble Thrombomodulin on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: The SCARLET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1993-2002.

  44. van der Poll T. Recombinant Human Soluble Thrombomodulin in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: Another Negative Sepsis Trial? JAMA. 2019;321:1978-80.

  45. Umemura Y, Yamakawa K. Optimal patient selection for anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: an evidence-based proposal from Japan. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:462–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamakawa K, Umemura Y, Hayakawa M, Kudo D, Sanui M, Takahashi H, Yoshikawa Y, Hamasaki T, Fujimi S. Benefit profile of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: a nationwide multicentre registry in Japan. Crit Care. 2016;20:229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yoshimura J, Yamakawa K, Ogura H, Umemura Y, Takahashi H, Morikawa M, Inoue Y, Fujimi S, Tanaka H, Hamasaki T, Shimazu T. Benefit profile of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a multicenter propensity score analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wada T, Yamakawa K, Kabata D, Abe T, Ogura H, Shiraishi A, Saitoh D, Kushimoto S, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, et al. Age-related differences in the survival benefit of the administration of antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination in sepsis. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wada T, Yamakawa K, Kabata D, Abe T, Fujishima S, Kushimoto S, Mayumi T, Ogura H, Saitoh D, Shiraishi A, et al. Sepsis-related coagulopathy treatment based on the disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study. J Intensive Care. 2023;11:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Winters JL. Plasma exchange in thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) other than thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017:632–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Moake JL. Thrombotic microangiopathies. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:589–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. George JN, Nester CM. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:654–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Iba T, Watanabe E, Umemura Y, Wada T, Hayashida K, Kushimoto S, Japanese Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guideline Working Group for disseminated intravascular c, Wada H. Sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation and its differential diagnoses. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;7:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Masias C, Vasu S, Cataland SR. None of the above: thrombotic microangiopathy beyond TTP and HUS. Blood. 2017;129:2857–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsai H-M. Pathophysiology of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Int J Hematol. 2010;91:1–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Scully M, Hunt BJ, Benjamin S, Liesner R, Rose P, Peyvandi F, Cheung B, Machin SJ, British Committee for Standards in H. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and other thrombotic microangiopathies. Br J Haematol. 2012;158:323–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bendapudi PK, Hurwitz S, Fry A, Marques MB, Waldo SW, Li A, Sun L, Upadhyay V, Hamdan A, Brunner AM, et al. Derivation and external validation of the PLASMIC score for rapid assessment of adults with thrombotic microangiopathies: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, Blanchette VS, Kelton JG, Nair RC, Spasoff RA, Canadian Apheresis Study Group. Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zheng XL, Vesely SK, Cataland SR, Coppo P, Geldziler B, Iorio A, Matsumoto M, Mustafa RA, Pai M, Rock G, et al. ISTH guidelines for treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2496–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Scully M, Ortel TL, Yu Z, Waliullah M, Zhang P, Patel M, Patwari P, Mellgard B, Wang LT. Recombinant ADAMTS13 for the Treatment of Acute TTP Events in Patients with Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Results from the Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study and the Phase 3b Continuation Study. Blood. 2023;142:692–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. George JN. Congenital TTP: toward a turning point. Blood. 2019;133:1615–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WL. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1073–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brown CC, Garcia X, Bhakta RT, Sanders E, Prodhan P. Severe Acute Neurologic Involvement in Children With Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome. Pediatrics. 2021;147:e2020013631.

  64. Shane AL, Mody RK, Crump JA, Tarr PI, Steiner TS, Kotloff K, Langley JM, Wanke C, Warren CA, Cheng AC, et al. 2017 infectious diseases society of America clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:e45–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wijnsma KL, van Bommel SAM, van der Velden T, Volokhina E, Schreuder MF, van den Heuvel LP, van de Kar NCAJ. Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;31:2163–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bruyand M, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Gouali M, de Valk H, King LA, Le Hello S, Bonacorsi S, Loirat C. Hemolytic uremic syndrome due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. Med Mal Infect. 2018;48:167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kakoullis L, Papachristodoulou E, Chra P, Panos G. Shiga toxin-induced haemolytic uraemic syndrome and the role of antibiotics: a global overview. J Infect. 2019;79:75–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Padmanabhan A, Connelly-Smith L, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Klingel R, Meyer E, Pham HP, Schneiderman J, Witt V, Wu Y, et al. Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue. J Clin Apher. 2019; 34:171-354.

  69. Jokiranta TS. HUS and atypical HUS. Blood. 2017;129:2847–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Scully M. Thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients: approach to the patient with thrombotic microangiopathy. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017:651–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Cataland SR, Wu HM. Diagnosis and management of complement mediated thrombotic microangiopathies. Blood Rev. 2014;28:67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Formeck C, Swiatecka-Urban A. Extra-renal manifestations of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34:1337–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bracewell A. A retrospective survey of carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx using computer-based data acquisition techniques. Proc R Soc Med. 1970;63:273–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Nester CM, Barbour T, de Cordoba SR, Dragon-Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Goodship THJ, Kavanagh D, Noris M, Pickering M, Sanchez-Corral P, et al. Atypical aHUS: state of the art. Mol Immunol. 2015;67:31–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pugh D, O’Sullivan ED, Duthie FA, Masson P, Kavanagh D. Interventions for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3:CD012862.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Rondeau E, Scully M, Ariceta G, Barbour T, Cataland S, Heyne N, Miyakawa Y, Ortiz S, Swenson E, Vallee M, et al. The long-acting C5 inhibitor, Ravulizumab, is effective and safe in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome naïve to complement inhibitor treatment. Kidney Int. 2020;97:1287–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Legendre CM, Licht C, Muus P, Greenbaum LA, Babu S, Bedrosian C, Bingham C, Cohen DJ, Delmas Y, Douglas K, et al. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2169–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Go RS, Winters JL, Leung N, Murray DL, Willrich MA, Abraham RS, Amer H, Hogan WJ, Marshall AL, Sethi S, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy care pathway: a consensus statement for the mayo clinic Complement Alternative Pathway-Thrombotic Microangiopathy (CAP-TMA) Disease-Oriented Group. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1189–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Scully M, Cataland S, Coppo P, de la Rubia J, Friedman KD, Kremer Hovinga J, Lämmle B, Matsumoto M, Pavenski K, Sadler E, et al. Consensus on the standardization of terminology in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related thrombotic microangiopathies. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:312–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Al-Nouri ZL, Reese JA, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, George JN. Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic review of published reports. Blood. 2015;125:616–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Izzedine H, Perazella MA. Thrombotic microangiopathy, cancer, and cancer drugs. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:857–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zerón P, López-Guillermo A, Khamashta MA, Bosch X. Adult haemophagocytic syndrome. Lancet. 2014;383:1503–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Morimoto A, Nakazawa Y, Ishii E. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Pediatr Int. 2016;58:817–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ishii E, Ohga S, Imashuku S, Yasukawa M, Tsuda H, Miura I, Yamamoto K, Horiuchi H, Takada K, Ohshima K, et al. Nationwide survey of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2007;86:58–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Chinn IK, Eckstein OS, Peckham-Gregory EC, Goldberg BR, Forbes LR, Nicholas SK, Mace EM, Vogel TP, Abhyankar HA, Diaz MI, et al. Genetic and mechanistic diversity in pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Blood. 2018;132:89–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Jordan MB, Allen CE, Greenberg J, Henry M, Hermiston ML, Kumar A, Hines M, Eckstein O, Ladisch S, Nichols KE, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: Recommendations from the North American Consortium for Histiocytosis (NACHO). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66:e27929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Henter JI, Aricò M, Egeler RM, Elinder G, Favara BE, Filipovich AH, Gadner H, Imashuku S, Janka-Schaub G, Komp D, HLH study Group of the Histiocyte Society, et al. HLH-94: a treatment protocol for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997;28:342–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Lecommandeur D, Merlin F, Daussant J, Van Hoegaerden M. Monoclonal antibodies to barley alpha-amylase I: production, characterization, and application to a specific immunoassay. Hybridoma. 1990;9:177–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Ponzoni M, Ferreri AJ, Campo E, Facchetti F, Mazzucchelli L, Yoshino T, Murase T, Pileri SA, Doglioni C, Zucca E, et al. Definition, diagnosis, and management of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma: proposals and perspectives from an international consensus meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Murase T, Nakamura S, Kawauchi K, Matsuzaki H, Sakai C, Inaba T, Nasu K, Tashiro K, Suchi T, Saito H. An Asian variant of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma: clinical, pathological and cytogenetic approaches to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with haemophagocytic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:826–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020;395:497–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Li X, Ma X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it “typical” ARDS? Crit Care. 2020;24:198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Conway EM, Mackman N, Warren RQ, Wolberg AS, Mosnier LO, Campbell RA, Gralinski LE, Rondina MT, van de Veerdonk FL, Hoffmeister KM, et al. Understanding COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:639–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Gu SX, Tyagi T, Jain K, Gu VW, Lee SH, Hwa JM, Kwan JM, Krause DS, Lee AI, Halene S, et al. Thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy: crucial contributors to COVID-19 thromboinflammation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:194–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Iba T, Levy JH. The roles of platelets in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022;32:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Flaumenhaft R, Enjyoji K, Schmaier AA. Vasculopathy in COVID-19. Blood. 2022;140:222–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Campbell RA, Boilard E, Rondina MT. Is there a role for the ACE2 receptor in SARS-CoV-2 interactions with platelets? J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:46–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Mizurini DM, Hottz ED, Bozza PT, Monteiro RQ. Fundamentals in Covid-19-associated thrombosis: molecular and cellular aspects. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:785738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:844–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, Aaron JG, Claassen J, Rabbani LE, Hastie J, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1763–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Liao D, Zhou F, Luo L, Xu M, Wang H, Xia J, Gao Y, Cai L, Wang Z, Yin P, et al. Haematological characteristics and risk factors in the classification and prognosis evaluation of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e671–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Al-Samkari H, Karp Leaf RS, Dzik WH, Carlson JCT, Fogerty AE, Waheed A, Goodarzi K, Bendapudi PK, Bornikova L, Gupta S, et al. COVID-19 and coagulation: bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood. 2020;136:489–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Iba T, Warkentin TE, Thachil J, Levi M, Levy JH. Proposal of the Definition for COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy. J Clin Med. 2021;10:191.

  105. Levi M, Thachil J. Coronavirus Disease 2019 coagulopathy: disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathy-either, neither, or both. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2020;46:781–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Asakura H, Ogawa H. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int J Hematol. 2021;113:45–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Iba T, Levy JH, Connors JM, Warkentin TE, Thachil J, Levi M. The unique characteristics of COVID-19 coagulopathy. Crit Care. 2020;24:360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1094–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Schulman S, Sholzberg M, Spyropoulos AC, Zarychanski R, Resnick HE, Bradbury CA, Broxmeyer L, Connors JM, Falanga A, Iba T, et al. ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20:2214–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Afdhal N, McHutchison J, Brown R, Jacobson I, Manns M, Poordad F, Weksler B, Esteban R. Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008;48:1000–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Gallo P, Terracciani F, Di Pasquale G, Esposito M, Picardi A, Vespasiani-Gentilucci U. Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease: Physiopathology and new therapeutic strategies before invasive procedures. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:4061–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Shiffman ML, Rodriguez-Torres M, Sigal S, Bourliere M, Berg T, Gordon SC, Campbell FM, Theodore D, et al. Eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Arroyo V, Moreau R, Kamath PS, Jalan R, Ginès P, Nevens F, Fernández J, To U, García-Tsao G, Schnabl B. Acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Méndez-Guerrero O, Calle-Rodas DA, Cervantes-Alvarez E, Alatorre-Arenas E, Pérez-Escobar J, Navarro-Alvarez N, Torre A. Renal and brain failure predict mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure admitted to the intensive care unit. Ann Hepatol. 2021;22:100270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Lisman T, Porte RJ. Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: evidence and clinical consequences. Blood. 2010;116:878–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Strnad P, Tacke F, Koch A, Trautwein C. Liver - guardian, modifier and target of sepsis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:55–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Arroyo V, Moreau R, Jalan R. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Perez Ruiz de Garibay A, Kortgen A, Leonhardt J, Zipprich A, Bauer M: Critical care hepatology: definitions, incidence, prognosis and role of liver failure in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2022; 26:289.

  119. Greinacher A. Clinical practice Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:252–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Arepally GM. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2017;129:2864–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and management. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:535–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Warkentin TE, Linkins LA. Non-necrotizing heparin-induced skin lesions and the 4T’s score. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:1483–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Warkentin TE, Basciano PA, Knopman J, Bernstein RA. Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome: 2 new cases and a proposal for defining this disorder. Blood. 2014;123:3651–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Spontaneous HIT syndrome: Knee replacement, infection, and parallels with vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res. 2021;204:40–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Rafiq A, Tariq H, Abbas N, Shenoy R. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a case report and literature review. Am J Case Rep. 2015;16:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Iba T, Umemura Y, Watanabe E, Wada T, Hayashida K, Kushimoto S. Diagnosis of sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and coagulopathy. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6:223–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Iba T, Levy JH, Wada H, Thachil J, Warkentin TE, Levi M. Differential diagnoses for sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17:415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Abe T, Sasaki A, Ueda T, Miyakawa Y, Ochiai H. Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation successfully treated with eculizumab: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Fujisawa M, Kato H, Yoshida Y, Usui T, Takata M, Fujimoto M, Wada H, Uchida Y, Kokame K, Matsumoto M, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic backgrounds of Japanese patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:1088–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Sakurai S, Kato H, Yoshida Y, Sugawara Y, Fujisawa M, Yasumoto A, Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Yatomi Y, Nangaku M. Profiles of coagulation and fibrinolysis activation-associated molecular markers of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the acute phase. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020;27:353–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Wada H, Kokame K, Miyakawa Y, Ueda Y, Higasa S, Moriki T, Yagi H, Miyata T, et al. Diagnostic and treatment guidelines for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) 2017 in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2017;106:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Delvaeye M, Noris M, De Vriese A, Esmon CT, Esmon NL, Ferrell G, Del-Favero J, Plaisance S, Claes B, Lambrechts D, et al. Thrombomodulin mutations in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:345–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Maga TK, Nishimura CJ, Weaver AE, Frees KL, Smith RJH. Mutations in alternative pathway complement proteins in American patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:E1445-1460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin E, Mossali C, Pianetti G, Gamba S, Daina E, Fenili C, Castelletti F, Sorosina A, et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1844–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Garnier A, Bienaimé F, Dragon-Durey M-A, Ngo S, Moulin B, Servais A, Provot F, Rostaing L, et al. Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide French series comparing children and adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:554–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Fujiwara H, Maeda Y, Sando Y, Nakamura M, Tani K, Ishikawa T, Nishimori H, Matsuoka K-I, Fujii N, Kondo E, Tanimoto M. Treatment of thrombotic microangiopathy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin. Transfusion. 2016;56:886–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Martin K, Borgel D, Lerolle N, Feys HB, Trinquart L, Vanhoorelbeke K, Deckmyn H, Legendre P, Diehl J-L, Baruch D. Decreased ADAMTS-13 (A disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats) is associated with a poor prognosis in sepsis-induced organ failure. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2375–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Ono T, Mimuro J, Madoiwa S, Soejima K, Kashiwakura Y, Ishiwata A, Takano K, Ohmori T, Sakata Y. Severe secondary deficiency of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) in patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: its correlation with development of renal failure. Blood. 2006;107:528–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Hyun J, Kim HK, Kim J-E, Lim M-G, Jung JS, Park S, Cho H-I. Correlation between plasma activity of ADAMTS-13 and coagulopathy, and prognosis in disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Res. 2009;124:75–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Habe K, Wada H, Ito-Habe N, Hatada T, Matsumoto T, Ohishi K, Maruyama K, Imai H, Mizutani H, Nobori T. Plasma ADAMTS13, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and VWF propeptide profiles in patients with DIC and related diseases. Thromb Res. 2012;129:598–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Smeets NJL, Fijnheer R, Sebastian S, De Mast Q. Secondary thrombotic microangiopathy with severely reduced ADAMTS13 activity in a patient with Capnocytophaga canimorsus sepsis: a case report. Transfusion. 2018;58:2426–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Tani N, Nakamura K, Sumida K, Suzuki M, Imaoka K, Shimono N. An Immunocompetent Case of Capnocytophaga canimorsus Infection Complicated by Secondary Thrombotic Microangiopathy and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Intern Med. 2019;58:3479–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Sakamaki Y, Konishi K, Hayashi K, Hashiguchi A, Hayashi M, Kubota E, Saruta T, Itoh H. Renal thrombotic microangiopathy in a patient with septic disseminated intravascular coagulation. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Farkas P, Csuka D, Mikes B, Sinkovits G, Réti M, Németh E, Rácz K, Madách K, Gergely M, Demeter J, Prohászka Z. Complement activation, inflammation and relative ADAMTS13 deficiency in secondary thrombotic microangiopathies. Immunobiology. 2017;222:119–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Gando S, Saitoh D, Ogura H, Mayumi T, Koseki K, Ikeda T, Ishikura H, Iba T, Ueyama M, Eguchi Y, et al. Natural history of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed based on the newly established diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: results of a multicenter, prospective survey. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the J-STAD (Japan Sepsis Treatment and Diagnosis) Study Group members for their valuable comments and discussions. The following are the members of the J-STAD Study Group other than the listed authors: Takayuki Ogura, Yu Kawazoe, Yudai Takatani, Chie Tanaka, Kensuke Nakamura, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Katsunori Mochizuki, Maiko Yamazaki. This study was supported by Asahi Kasei Pharma; Toray Industries, Inc.; LSI Medience Corporation; and Sysmex Corporation. The sponsors were not involved in the planning of the research or the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received funding from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, PHC Holdings Corporation, Sysmex Corporation and Toray Industries, Inc. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

K.S. and T.W. designed the review and wrote the initial drafts of the manuscript. H.I. contributed to the study conception and critically revised the manuscript. All other authors contributed substantially to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and interpretation of the literature review, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Wada.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satoh, K., Wada, T., Tampo, A. et al. Practical approach to thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis: a narrative review. Thrombosis J 22, 67 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-024-00637-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-024-00637-0

Keywords