Open Access

Emphasis on the Role of PF4 in the Incidence, Pathophysiology and Treatment of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Thrombosis Journal201311:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-11-7

Received: 13 December 2012

Accepted: 25 March 2013

Published: 5 April 2013

Abstract

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) associated with polyanionic glycosaminoglycan drugs or displayed on vascular cell membranes. These antibodies are elicited by multimolecular complexes that can occur when heparin is administered in clinical settings associated with abundant PF4. Heparin binding alters native PF4 and elicits immune recognition and response. While the presence of heparin is integral to immunogenesis, the HIT antibody binding site is within PF4. Thus HIT antibodies develop and function to cause thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis only in the presence of PF4. Future emphasis on understanding the biology, turnover and regulation of PF4 may lead to insights into the prevention and treatment of HIT.

Keywords

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)Platelet Factor 4 (PF4)Heparin

Review

Introduction

With the introduction of heparin into clinical practice in the 1940s, surgeons were able to perform complex operations using this anticoagulant to prevent and/or treat obstructive clots. The availability, over-all safety and performance of heparin opened the door for procedures such as hemodialysis, open-heart surgery and organ transplants [1]. Today, heparins are used for prophylaxis and treatment of an expanding list of medical conditions and surgical and interventional procedures [2]. An estimated 12 million patients receive some form of heparin each year in the United States [3].

In the decades following its introduction however, a paradoxical, adverse effect of heparin was recognized [4]. In a small percentage of patients, there was an unexplained drop in platelet count after several days of heparin therapy. Typically, low platelet count in the face of anticoagulation poses the risk of a bleeding complication. Instead patients with this “heparin-induced thrombocytopenia” (HIT) were at risk for venous and arterial thrombosis [5]. HIT thrombosis (HITT) necessitates the withdrawal of heparin which would exacerbate rather than resolve this unusual clotting condition. In the absence of an effective alternative therapy, HITT can progress to thromboembolic complications including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and stroke [6]. Depending on the patient population, HIT occurs in 0.5-5% of patients receiving heparin for 5 or more days. Of patients with HIT, 30-72% develop thrombotic complications with 10% risk of limb amputation and 20-30% risk of death [7]. The difficulty of management and the devastating consequences of the HIT(T) syndrome have encouraged an abundance of research into HIT pathogenesis, with the goal of minimizing the risk for developing HIT(T) and discovering safe and effective alternative anticoagulant drugs [8].

Early investigators determined that the agent responsible for HIT was a platelet-activating antibody that caused platelet consumption and a hypercoagulable state [9]. Initial suspicion of an immune involvement in HIT, based on the 5–15 day interval between heparin exposure and onset of symptoms, was confirmed by demonstrating that HIT patient sera or its IgG fraction caused activation of donor platelets in the presence of heparin in vitro [10, 11]. However the “heparin antibody” could not be isolated [12]. After a decade, investigators discovered that the HIT antigen was not heparin itself, but rather a specific complex of heparin with an endogenous platelet protein, platelet factor 4 (PF4) [1315]. Much research has been devoted to evaluating the specifics of titer, isotype and avidity of PF4/heparin antibodies [1619] and the characteristics, duration or dosage of heparin-like drug [2023] that are most closely related to HIT pathology. Far fewer reports deal with the role of PF4 in the risk of immunogenesis (development) and pathogenesis (function) of HIT antibodies. This review emphasizes the central role that the availability of the PF4 antigen plays in HIT.

Platelet Factor 4

Platelet factor 4 (PF4), also known as chemokine CXCL4, is a cationic, 7.8 kDa protein which forms tetramers at physiological pH and ionic strength [2426]. PF4 is released from the alpha-granules of activated platelets as a complex with a chondroitin sulfate proteoglyan carrier [27, 28]. It disappears rapidly from plasma as it transfers to higher affinity heparan sulfate [2931] on endothelial cells [32, 33], inhibiting local antithrombin (AT) activity and thus promoting coagulation [34]. In addition to its role in hemostasis, PF4 has many other biological effects, which may also depend on its association with extracellular glycosaminoglycans (GAGs); these have been reviewed elsewhere [3436].

Role of PF4 in HIT immunogenesis (antibody development)

In addition to the presence of heparin during anticoagulant therapy the formation of immunogenic complexes that provoke antibody depends on the availability of PF4 [37]. The plasma level of PF4 is proportional to the extent and duration of platelet activation and of PF4 turnover, depending to a large extent on the underlying clinical status of each patient [38]. Increased PF4 levels are observed in inflammatory or infectious disease [39, 40], diabetes [41], cardiovascular and renal disease [4244], atherosclerosis [45] and other conditions affecting vascular health [41, 4648] or in response to traumatic medical procedures [4951] or cardiopulmonary bypass [52]. Upon release from activated platelets, PF4 rapidly associates with heparan sulfate on endothelial cells and can be brought back into circulation by heparin, for which it has a higher affinity [30, 31, 53]. This heparin-releasable PF4 pool (HR-PF4) can be evaluated by measuring plasma PF4 before and after injection of heparin; subsequent heparin doses release less PF4 for an interval related to the rate that PF4 accumulates on the endothelium [54, 55]. HR-PF4 is another measure of PF4 availability. Compared to healthy control subjects, a higher level and rate of re-establishment of the extracellular PF4 has been demonstrated in several patient populations, including those with diabetes [56, 57], atherosclerosis [58] renal, [44] cardiovascular or coronary artery disease [5961]. Underlying disease, especially when associated with platelet activation, impacts the availability of PF4 and the likelihood of formation of multimolecular PF4/heparin complexes.

The availability of PF4 is influenced both by acute and chronic platelet activation, and logically plays a role in the risk for generation of PF4/heparin antibodies in the context of anticoagulant therapy. This suggests an explanation for the common observation that specific patient populations are known to be at an increased risk of developing HIT antibodies [51, 6264]. Thus it is important to recognize that in addition to the type, dose and duration of heparin therapy, there are patient related variables that are important in assessing the risk for generation of HIT antibodies [8, 65, 66].

Role of PF4 in HIT pathogenesis (antibody function)

It is well documented in the literature that the presence of HIT antibody does not cause thrombocytopenia or thrombosis in the majority of seropositive patients [62, 6769]. It is when certain HIT antibodies bind their PF4 antigen, forming immune complexes, that subsequent Fc-gamma receptor-mediated platelet activation ensues and can lead to thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. Thus the HIT syndrome depends not only on the presence of HIT antibodies of sufficient titer and specificity but also on the presence of the antigenic PF4 target [37]. Many of the conditions that increase the risk of antibody formation by causing platelet activation and release of PF4 (as described above) similarly increase the risk of clinical consequences due to HIT antibody immune complex-mediated platelet activation [51, 70].

In contrast to immunogenesis (formation of antibodies), which is dependent on the presence of heparin, HIT pathogenesis (antibody function) can occur after cessation of anticoagulant therapy, referred to as “delayed HIT” [7176]. Studies have demonstrated that PF4 bound to glycosaminoglycans on the surface of endothelial cells, monocytes and platelets can present the HIT antibody target antigen [65, 7780]. Thus the HIT antigenic target may be available in the absence of heparin, when PF4 from activated platelets associates with GAGs on vascular cells [79]. There is no evidence to suggest that extracellular GAG-associated PF4 initiates antibody formation; however, HIT antibodies resulting from heparin exposure may bind to these sites and form HIT antigen-antibody immune complexes. Indeed, HIT related thrombotic complications often occur at sites of vascular damage from catheter placement or at surgical sites [8186], where PF4 can accumulate at high levels [29]. Many situations, both during and subsequent to hospitalization, may impact the level of platelet activation and lead to an increase in GAG-associated PF4, and potential HIT target antigen. Chronic health conditions such as atherosclerosis, diabetes or hypercholesterolemia [41, 48, 75], as well as spontaneous/isolated instances of infection or injury, for example, could change the likelihood of HIT occurring in seropositive patients by increasing platelet activation and the availability of PF4 target antigen [87]. Currently scoring systems, based on evaluation of clinical presentation [8890], along with laboratory measurements of the titer, isotype and in vitro functionality of PF4/heparin antibodies are the basis of assessing the likelihood of clinical HIT [16, 17]. Patient-related factors, including status of platelet activation and PF4 turnover certainly play a role in HIT risk. Further research will be needed to understand how to evaluate these factors to improve risk prediction.

PF4/Heparin complexes

The development and functionality of HIT antibodies are dependent not only on availability of PF4, but more importantly on the level of PF4 in relation to heparin (or other GAG) [63, 91]. The binding of the cationic PF4 tetramer and heparin, or other polymeric anion, occurs by relatively non-specific electrostatic interactions [20, 9294], and the size and characteristics of the resulting complexes are governed by the concentration of each [63]. Numerous in vitro studies have been conducted using antibodies isolated from HIT patients to define the characteristics of PF4/heparin complexes that are most antigenic (cross-reactive). These studies indicate that complexes formed at near equimolar ratios of PF4 and heparin, correlate with optimal antibody binding. With higher proportions of heparin, complexes are smaller and do not bind to form platelet activating HIT antibody immune complexes [63, 9598]. Platelet factor 4 to heparin ratios (PHRs) in the range of 3:1 to 0.7:1 result in ultralarge complexes (ULCs) [91, 97] with net neutral surface charge [63] and arrays of closely approximated PF4 tetramers [99]. It is believed that these unique, near equimolar PHR complexes cause conformational changes within and/or among PF4 tetramers [99101], that expose neoepitopes which represent the HIT antibody binding site.

Experimental and clinical studies find a distinction between antigenicity and immunogenicity, that is, between antibody binding or cross-reactivity, and antibody formation or seroconversion. Experiments employing a mouse model to investigate HIT immunogenesis have demonstrated that mouse PF4 (mPF4)/heparin complexes, but not mPF4 alone cause development of mPF4/heparin-reactive antibodies. The higher the concentration of mPF4/heparin complexes the greater was the antibody formation [96]. A somewhat surprising study showed that while the equimolar, charge neutral mPF4/heparin ratios resulted in the largest and most antigenic complexes, smaller, high PHR complexes (i.e., PF4>>heparin) with net positive surface charge caused greater mPF4/heparin antibody formation [63]. Various clinical studies conclude that the risk of HIT seroconversion is far less with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) compared to unfractionated heparin, yet in in vitro assays, LMWHs cross-react with HIT-antibodies to cause maximal platelet activation [102104]. Cases of HIT antibody seroconversion have been reported in patients treated with the pentasaccharide, fondaparinux [105]. Surprisingly, the fondaparinux-elicited antibodies cross-react with heparin and LMHWs, but not fondaparinux, in vitro [106, 107]. Thus PF4/heparin complexes that bind the most HIT antibodies might not be identical to those which provoke de novo antibody generation [108].

It is also interesting to consider that anticoagulant ratios of PF4 and heparin differ from those of antigenic or immunogenic complexes. Only heparin in excess of PF4 has anticoagulant effect [109]. Heparin is neutralized by PF4 present in vitro in PHRs down to as low as 0.42:1 (i.e., PF4<heparin). Heparin would be neutralized by PF4/heparin complexes in the equimolar range associated with maximal HIT antibody binding [110112]. It is difficult to attribute the process of immunization to the PF4/heparin ratios that would be present during effective anticoagulation. On the contrary, the possibility that higher PHRs may be more immunogenic would explain why minimal heparin exposure, such as heparin flushes [113, 114], and lower relative dosage, such as prophylactic vs therapeutic heparin [64, 91] are often highly immunogenic. While much has been learned about the physiochemical characteristics of PF4/heparin complexes in which HIT antibody binding sites are exposed, the nature of the in vivo immunogen is less well understood.

PF4 and innate immunity

With the discovery that a specific PF4/heparin complex was the HIT antigen [13, 115] it seemed that the “foreignness” of the heparin-bound PF4 conformation elicited the immune response and the generation of antibodies. Yet studies using antibodies isolated from HIT patients soon demonstrated that PF4 bound to other glycosaminoglycan drugs could also be targeted by PF4/heparin antibodies [116]. These antibodies also bind to PF4 on endothelial cells [13], monocytes [77] or platelets [78, 117], or to PF4 immobilized on anionic surfaces [94]. While the conformational neoepitope can be exposed by other PF4 binding partners, none are as immunogenic as unfractionated heparin. That is, they were far less likely to elicit de novo antibody formation, suggesting that the impetus for the HIT immune response may be more complex than the presence of a conformational change in a self-protein.

The HIT immune response has several unique aspects, and is as yet, not completely understood [118]. Adaptive, or acquired, immune responses are characterized by antigen-specific antibodies of the IgG isotype, and by immune memory for efficient response to subsequent antigen exposure. Acquired responses are relatively slow to occur, as antibody producing B-cells work with T-cells which recognize specifically presented epitopes of the target. A more immediate, less specific B-cell response occurs in response to generic classes of pathogenic organisms and is independent of past exposure. This rapid innate response is characterized by a less specific, more transient population of IgM antibodies [119]. The HIT immune response is unique. It is characterized by PF4/GAG specific antibodies that occur after only several days of heparin exposure. Despite the rapid appearance, HIT antibodies are often of the IgG isotype. Yet, HIT antibody titers decrease rapidly and there is no memory B-cell response. HIT immunogenesis is not typical of either the innate or the adaptive response, but shares characteristics of each [120, 121].

In addition to their role in hemostasis, platelets are increasingly recognized as immune effector cells [122, 123]. PF4 is a member of a highly conserved family of host defense effector polypeptides, kinocidins, which display both antimicrobial and leukocyte chemotactic activity [124, 125] and play a role in the actions of both the innate and adaptive immune systems [126]. PF4 and other kinocidins contain a signature cationic, amphipathic motif that interacts with and disrupts charged lipid membranes. In its antimicrobial role, PF4 binds to specific species of bacteria, fungus [124, 125] and parasites [127, 128] facilitating immune defense responses [125, 129].

This innate immune role of PF4 may help explain the unusual immune response to PF4 in the presence of heparin. In its antimicrobial role, PF4 binds to anionic components of bacterial surfaces. It has been discovered that PF4 bound to bacteria can be used to affinity enrich HIT antibodies from patient sera, thus demonstrating that antibodies generated in response to heparin therapy cross react with PF4 epitopes exposed on bacterial cells [120]. There is also accumulating evidence that the converse is true, that antibodies occurring naturally in response to microbial infections recognize PF4/heparin complexes. PF4/heparin-reactive IgG and IgM antibodies have been detected in up to 6% of the normal population [120, 130, 131]. Otherwise healthy individuals with a bacterial periodontal infection, but not exposed to heparin, have measurable PF4/heparin-cross reactive antibodies in proportion to the severity of their disease [132]. And “spontaneous HIT” has been described in patients who developed clinical symptoms and HIT-reactive antibodies without history of heparin exposure, especially in cases of recent bacterial infection [133]. Thus an immune response to endogenous, PF4-bound microbial targets could explain the occurrence of PF4/heparin cross-reactive antibodies in heparin naïve patients or the common observations that seriously ill or septic patients are at greater risk of developing HIT in the presence of heparin [134136]. These studies suggest a similarity between PF4 bound to microbes and PF4 bound to heparin or to vascular cells.

A direct test of the concept that endogenous PF4-bound target antigens resemble the antigen generated by heparin during anticoagulant therapy used a mouse model of polymicrobial bacteria sepsis, and demonstrated that bacterial exposure resulted in development of PF4/heparin-reactive antibodies with a time course of a typical primary immune response [120]. These studies support the concept that HIT antibodies may resemble naturally occurring antibodies elicited by PF4 functioning as an antimicrobial agent [120, 137]. This provides a context to understand how anticoagulant therapy may provoke antibody formation, as the presence of PF4 in complexes with heparin or expressed on the surface of vascular cells may mimic the presentation of PF4 bound to a pathogen, triggering a protective, innate immune response.

Heparin as an immune adjuvant

Naturally occurring soluble proteins are poorly immunogenic in the absence of an adjuvant such as alum or various oil emulsions, which have been used empirically as immunostimulatory agents [138]. Adjuvants organize surface antigenic epitopes; proteins expressed in a repetitive and ordered fashion are much more immunogenic than in soluble form, and may directly crosslink B-cell receptors (BCRs) [139]. Heparin displays PF4 in closely spaced, repetitive, ridge-like arrays creating polymeric repeating epitopes [99]. In this regards, heparin may serve as an adjuvant that results in an innate-immune response to PF4.

Cells of the immune system express a variety of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including toll-like receptors (TLRs). These receptors respond to pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are characteristic of pathogen groups, but distinct from “self”, allowing a limited number of receptors to recognize a great variety of pathogens [140]. Pattern recognition receptors are “threat detectors” that initiate signals to other immune cells [141]. It is becoming clear that commonly used adjuvants activate PRRs and that innate immune responses are central to their effectiveness [142, 143]. Indeed, recently there is a focus on discovering novel ligands of PRRs for use as adjuvants to increase efficiency of vaccine development [138]. It is possible that specific PF4/heparin complexes display the antimicrobial conformation of PF4 as a pathogenic molecular pattern and activate these receptors. Heparin also increases the immunogenicity of cationic binding partners, such as IL-8, neutrophil activating peptide-2 and protamine sulfate [144146]. Mouse immunization experiments have demonstrated that heparin increases immunogenicity of the cationic proteins, protamine and lysozyme, and that the immune responses resemble PF4/heparin seroconversion [145]. Thus, one hypothesis is that heparin functions as an adjuvant, by creating peptide motifs that act as agonists for innate immune pattern recognition receptors.

TLR activation is central to both innate and adaptive immune responses. Specific TLRs respond to particular pathogen classes, generating a context-specific, unique profile of cytokine signals which modulate the magnitude and fine structure of the B cell antibody response [142]. In this way, innate immune recognition of PAMPs provides information on the nature of a pathogen in order to activate and orchestrate the most effective adaptive effector response [138]. Prolonged receptor engagement is required for lymphocytes and dendritic cell differentiation and proliferation to result in plasma cells with high affinity IgG and memory B cells [142]. In contrast, to quickly neutralize replicating pathogens, a more rapid response can be evoked by TLR agonist-mediated activation of dendritic cells and specific B cell subsets to produce IgM as well as class-switched IgG and IgA through a T cell-independent pathway [119, 147]. Co-stimulation of TLRs and BCRs can initiate rapid antimicrobial antibody responses to contain pathogen loads until the T-cell dependent antibody responses peak [142]. The balance between the innate and adaptive immune response could depend on the concentration and duration of antigen exposure. In the case of HIT, a persistent high level of the PF4 target antigen might support an adaptive immune response, whereas a more transient exposure might result in only T-cell independent antibody production with the absence of an immune memory response. There is evidence of both types of immune response in HIT [120]. The hypothesis that complexes of PF4 with heparin resemble a conserved pathogenic molecular pattern closely enough to activate TLRs may help explain aspects of the immunogenesis of HIT.

Prevention/treatment strategies

To date, strategies to prevent or treat HIT have focused on minimizing the use of unfractionated heparin in favor of LMWHs or direct thrombin inhibitors [148]. These alternative anticoagulants have important drawbacks; they are more expensive and complex to manage than heparin and pose risk of bleeding complicated by the absence of effective reversal agents [8]. Focusing on the central role of PF4 in the pathogenesis of HIT allows us to appreciate novel approaches to prevent or treat this syndrome.

As discussed above, HIT antibodies are necessary but not sufficient to cause the intense platelet activation that leads to thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. Formation of platelet-activating immune complexes depends on availability of the PF4 target antigen, and the risk of HIT is therefore highest in settings characterized by intense PF4 release. It is logical that minimizing the availability of PF4 or otherwise preventing formation of PF4/heparin complexes would be strategies to abrogate the risk of immunogenesis and pathogenesis of HIT antibodies [149].

One such strategy was suggested by observation of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. These patients do not achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction through diet or statin therapy and may undergo frequent LDL apheresis treatments. Despite the repeated exposure to heparin and predisposition to vascular disease, the incidence of HIT is low in this population [150]. Based on this observation, investigators studied the level of PF4 in plasma and on the surface of platelets before and after apheresis. Both plasma and surface PF4 were significantly reduced by the procedure. This may explain the lack of immunogenesis in spite of frequent heparin exposure in these patients. In addition this could prove to be a therapeutic strategy to reduce antigen availability in seropositive patients at high risk for HIT [150].

Presentation of the PF4 target antigen results from the physiochemical properties of complexes of heparin and PF4 tetramers formed and sustained at specific molar ratios [97]. In these highly ordered complexes heparin binding allows close approximation of specific amino acids on PF4 tetramers that create the antigenic epitope [99]. Two recent studies demonstrate that disrupting the tetrameric organization of PF4 by amino acid substitutions [151] or by small inhibitor molecules targeted to the dimer-dimer interface [152] prevents formation of ULCs. Complexes of variant PF4 and heparin were poorly recognized by HIT antibodies [151], and PF4 antagonist molecules inhibited HIT antibody-mediated platelet activation [152]. These studies demonstrate that strategies to alter or diminish the PF4 target antigen may lead to novel therapeutic approaches for treatment of HIT [149, 153].

In general, antigenic epitopes are exposed when PF4 binds to any heparin-derived anticoagulant drug. In addition to its anticoagulant activity heparin has potent anti-inflammatory properties; however, the risk of bleeding prevents its use for non-thrombotic indications. Heparin which is desulfated at the 2-O and 3-O positions (ODSH) retains anti-inflammatory properties but has reduced anticoagulant activity [154]. ODSH retains the ability to bind and form complexes with PF4, however, it does not cause platelet activation in the presence of HIT antibodies, suggesting that it does not expose antigenic PF4 target [155]. ODSH can compete with immobilized heparin for PF4 binding and can displace PF4 from cell surfaces [156, 157]. When combined with heparin, ODSH reduces immunogenicity in vivo [157] and ameliorates HIT antibody mediated platelet activation in vitro [155, 156]. When used together, the capacity of ODSH to sequester a proportion of available PF4 without generating immunogenic complexes may be an effective way to shift the PF4/heparin ratio toward less antigenic complexes. In addition, the availability of less PF4 to block AT binding and cause heparin neutralization could potentially increase anticoagulant potency [158]. Thus the anti-inflammatory, non-anticoagulant properties of ODSH may be useful for increasing the safety and effectiveness of other anticoagulants [159]. It is a particular advantage that ODSH has already undergone trials demonstrating that it can be safely administered to humans [160].

Conclusions

A determining factor in the risk that HIT antibodies will be elicited as a result of heparin anticoagulant therapy is the presence of PF4. The presence of PF4 also determines whether HIT antibodies will lead to thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis because only immune complexes of antibody plus target antigen, not antibodies alone, mediate the pathogenic platelet activation. This review presents the hypothesis that heparin serves as an adjuvant, which facilitates antibody formation by displaying PF4 in a motif recognized as a pathogen associated molecular pattern, an agonist for pattern recognition receptors on immune cells. Techniques aimed toward sequestering PF4 or minimizing its conformational alteration are promising areas of research toward developing effective clinical interventions to prevent or treat HIT.

Abbreviations

PF4: 

Platelet factor 4

PF4/H: 

Platelet factor 4/heparin

HIT: 

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

GAG: 

Glycosaminoglycan

ULC: 

Ultralarge complex

PAMP: 

Pathogen associated molecular pattern

PRR: 

Pattern recognition receptor

TLR: 

Toll like receptor

BCR: 

B-cell receptor: AT, antithrombin

PHR: 

PF4 to heparin ratio.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Pathology and Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center

References

  1. Messmore HL, Wehrmacher WH, Coyne E, Fareed J: Heparin to pentasaccharide and beyond: the end is not in sight. Semin Thromb Hemost 2004, 30(Suppl 1):81-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hirsh J, Raschke R: Heparin and low-molecular weight heparin: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 2004, 126(3 Suppl):188S-203S.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rice L, Nguyen PH, Vann AR: Preventing complications in heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Alternative anticoagulants are improving patient outcomes. Postgrad Med 2002, 112: 85-89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brieger DB, Mak KH, Kottke-Marchant K, Topol EJ: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 31: 1449-1459. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00134-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kelton JG, Warkentin TE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a historical perspective. Blood 2008, 112: 2607-2616. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Warkentin TE, Kelton JG: A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Am J Med 1996, 101: 502-507. 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00258-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy JH, Tanaka KA, Hursting MJ: Reducing thrombotic complications in the perioperative setting: an update on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Anesth Analg 2008, 105: 570-582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuker A, Cines DB: How I treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2012, 119: 2209-2218. 10.1182/blood-2011-11-376293PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chong BH: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 1995, 89: 431-439. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb08346.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chong BH, Pitney WR, Castaldi PA: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: association of thrombotic complications with heparin-dependent IgG antibody that induces thromboxane synthesis in platelet aggregation. Lancet 1982, 2: 1246-1249.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chong BH, Fawaz I, Chesterman CN, Berndt MC: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: mechanism of interaction of the heparin-dependent antibody with platelets. Br J Haematol 1989, 73: 235-240. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1989.tb00258.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Green D, Harris K, Reynolds N, Roberts M, Patterson R: Heparin immune thrombocytopenia: Evidence for a heparin-platelet complex as the antigenic determinant. J Lab Clin Med 1978, 91: 167-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Visentin GP, Ford SE, Scott JP, Aster RH: Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 1994, 93: 81-88. 10.1172/JCI116987PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Greinacher A, Potzsch B, Amiral J, Dummel V, Eichner A, Mueller-Eckhardt C: Heparin-associated thrombocytopia: Isolation of the antibody and characterization of a multimolecular PF4-heparin complex as the major antigen. Thromb Haemost 1994, 71: 247-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Amiral J, Bridey F, Dreyfus M, Vissac M, Fressinaud E, Wolf M, Meyer D: Platelet factor 4 complexed to heparin is the target for antibodies generated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 1992, 68: 95-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Greinacher A, Ittermann T, Bagemühl J, Althaus K, Fürll B, Selleng S, Lubenow N, Schellong S, Sheppard JI, Warkentin TE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: towards standardization of platelet factor 4/heparin antigen tests. J Thromb Haemost 2010, 8: 2025-2031. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03974.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JI, Moore JC, Sigouin CS, Kelton JG: Quantitative interpretation of optical density measurements using PF4-dependent enzyme-immunoassays. J Thromb Haemost 2008, 6: 1304-1312. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03025.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Greinacher A, Juhl D, Strobel U, Raschke R, Fueril B, Wessel A, Lubenow N, Eichler P, Warkentin TE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet-activation capacity and clinical significance of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class. J Thromb Haemost 2007, 5: 1667-1673.Google Scholar
  19. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Moore JC, Moore KM, Sigouin CS, Kelton JG: Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: how much class to we need? J Lab Clin Med 2005, 146: 341-346. 10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Greinacher A, Michels I, Mueller-Eckhardt C: Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia: The antibody is not heparin specific. Thromb Haemost 1992, 67: 545-549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Greinacher A, Alban S, Drummel V, Franz G, Mueller-Eckhardt C: Characterization of the structural requirements for a carbohydrate-based anticoagulant with a reduced risk of inducing the immunological type of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 1995, 74: 886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haas S, Walenga JM, Jeske WP, Fareed J: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Clinical considerations of alternative anticoagulation with various glycosaminoglycans and thrombin inhibitors. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1999, 5: 52-59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Walenga JM, Koza MJ, Lewis BE, Pifarre R: Relative heparin-induced thrombocytopenic potential of low molecular weight heparins and new antithrombotic agents. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1996, 2(Suppl. 1):S21-S27.Google Scholar
  24. Mayo KH, Chen MJ: Human platelet factor 4 monomer-dimer-tetramer equilibria investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1989, 28: 9469-9478. 10.1021/bi00450a034PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore S, Pepper DS, Cash JD: Platelet antiheparin activity. The isolation and characterisation of platelet factor 4 released from thrombin-aggregated washed human platelets and its dissociation into subunits and the isolation of membrane-bound antiheparin activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975, 379: 370-384. 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90144-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Deuel TF, Keim PJ, Farmer M, Heinrikson RL: Amino acid sequence of human platelet factor 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1977, 74: 2256-2258. 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2256PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang SS, Huang JS, Deuel TF: Proteoglycan carrier of human platelet factor 4. J Biol Chem 1982, 257: 11546-11550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Barber AJ, Kaser-Glanzmann R, Jakabova M, Luscher EF: Characterization of a chondroitin 4-sulfate proteoglycan carrier for heparin neutralizing activity (platelet factor 4) released from human blood platelets. Biochim Biophys Acta 1972, 286: 312-329. 10.1016/0304-4165(72)90267-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Stringer SE, Galagher JT: Specific binding of the chemokine platelet factor 4 to heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem 1997, 272: 20508-20514. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20508PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Handin RI, Cohen HJ: Purification and binding properties of human platelet factor four. J Biol Chem 1976, 251: 4273-4282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Luscombe M, Marshall S, Pepper DS, Holbrook JJ: The transfer of platelet factor 4 from its proteoglycan carrier to natural and synthetic polymers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981, 18: 137-142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rybak ME, Gimbrone MA Jr, Davies PF, Handin RI: Interaction of platelet factor four with cultured vascular endothelial cells. Blood 1989, 73: 1534-1539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cines DB: Disorders associated with antibodies to endothelial cells. Rev Infect Dis 1989, 11(4):705-711. 10.1093/clinids/11.Supplement_4.S705View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sachais BS, Higazi AA, Cines DB, Poncz M, Kowalska MA: Interactions of platelet factor 4 with the vessel wall. Semin Thromb Hemost 2004, 30: 351-358. 10.1055/s-2004-831048PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Shi G, Morrell CN: Platelets as initiators and mediators of inflammation at the vessel wall. Thromb Res 2011, 127: 387-390. 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.10.019PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Slungaard A: Platelet factor 4: a chemokine enigma. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005, 37: 1162-1167. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.12.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Amiral J, Vissac AM: Generation and pathogenicity of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies: Diagnostic implications. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1999, 5(Suppl 1):S28-S31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan KL, Owen J: Plasma levels of beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 as indices of platelet activation in vivo. Blood 1981, 57: 199-202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mavrommatis AC, Theodoridis T, Orfanidou A, Roussos C, Christopoulou-Kokkinou V, Zakynthinos S: Coagulation system and platelets are fully activated in uncomplicated sepsis. Crit Care Med 2003, 28: 451-457.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakamura T, Ebihara I, Shoji H, Ushiyama C, Suzuki S, Koide H: Treatment with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber reduces platelet activation in septic shock patients: decrease in plasma levels of soluble P-selectin, platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin. Inflamm Res 1999, 48: 171-175. 10.1007/s000110050442PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Davi G, Gresele P, Violi F, Basili S, Catalano M, Giammarresi C, Volpato R, Nenci GG, Ciabattoni G, Patrono C: Diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension but not vascular disease per se are associated with persistent platelet activation in vivo. Evidence derived from the study of peripheral arterial disease. Circulation 1997, 96: 69-75. 10.1161/01.CIR.96.1.69PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Buyukasyk NS, Ileri M, Alper A, Senen K, Atak R, Hisar I, Yetkin E, Turhan H, Demirkan D: Increased blood coagulation and platelet activation in patients with infective endocarditis and embolic events. Clin Cardiol 2004, 27: 154-158. 10.1002/clc.4960270312PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Laghrissi-Thode F, Wagner WR, Pollock PC, Finkel MS: Elevated platelet factor 4 and β-thromboglobulin plasma levels in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Biol Psychiatry 1997, 42: 290-295. 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00345-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Endo Y, Mamiya S, Satoh M, Takahashi K, Harada T: Plasma beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 in patients with chronic renal failure and effect of hemodialysis. Tohoku J Exp Med 1981, 135: 349-358. 10.1620/tjem.135.349PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Pitsilos S, Hunt J, Mohler ER, Prabhaker AM, Poncz M, Dawicki J, Khalapyan TZ, Wolfe ML, Fairman R, Mitchell M: Platelet factor 4 localization in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: correlation with clinical parameters. Thromb Haemost 2003, 6: 1120.Google Scholar
  46. Yamanishi J, Sano H, Saito K, Furata Y, Fukuzaki H: Plasma concentrations of platelet-specific proteins in different stages of essential hypertension: interactions between platelet aggregation, blood lipids and age. Thromb Haemost 1985, 30: 539-543.Google Scholar
  47. Gjesdal K, Kjeldsen SE, Lande K, Westheim A, Aakesson I, Foss OP, Leren P, Eide IK: Blood platelet release correlates with serum lipids in 50 year old men with essential hypertension. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1986, 714: 125-128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ferroni P, Basili S, Davi G: Platelet activation, inflammatory mediators and hypercholesterolemia. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2003, 1: 157-169. 10.2174/1570161033476772PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Paramo JA, Rocha E: Deep vein thrombosis and related platelet changes after total hip replacement. Haemostasis 1985, 15: 389-394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kageyama K, Nakajima Y, Shibasaki M, Hashimoto S, Mizobe T: Increased platelet, leukocyte, and endothelial cell activity are associated with increased coagulability in patients after total knee arthroplasty. J Thromb Haemost 2007, 5: 738-745. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02443.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lubenow N, Hinz P, Thomaschewski S, Lietz T, Vogler M, Ladwig A, Junter M, Nauck M, Schellong S, Wander K: The severity of trauma determines the immune response to PF4/heparin and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010, 115: 1797-1803. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-231506PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Cella G, Vittadello O, Gallucci V, Girolami A: The release of β-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 during extracorporeal circulation for open heart surgery. Eur J Clin Invest 1981, 11: 165-169. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1981.tb01836.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Cofrancesco E, Colombi M, Cristoforetti G, Pogliani EM: Selective PF4 release in vitro induced by heparin and related glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) - correlation with beta TG-release and platelet aggregation. Thromb Haemost 1984, 28: 105-107.Google Scholar
  54. Cella G, Meyers CJ, Prosdocimi M, Sasahara AA: Human platelet factor 4 and protamine sulphate interaction with glycosaminoglycans in the rabbit. Eur J Clin Invest 1987, 17: 548-554. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb01156.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Cella G, Scattola N, Cappellato MG, Girolami A, Strauss WE, Sasahara AA: Platelet factor 4 release induced by intravenous administration of heparin. Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch 1985, 112: 165-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cella G, Scattola N, Vio C, Stevanato F, Lavagnini T, Padovan D, Girolami A: Platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin released platelet factor 4 (HR-PF4) in diabetes mellitus. Effect of the duration of the disease. Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch 1986, 113: 646-654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Cortellaro M, Cofrancesco E, Vicari A, Boshcetti C, Della Volpe A, Moreo G, Pozza G, Polli EE: High heparin released platelet factor 4 in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Thromb Res 1990, 58: 571-576. 10.1016/0049-3848(90)90303-TPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. O'Brien JR, Etherington MD, Pashley M: Intra-platelet platelet factor 4(IP-PF4) and the heparin-mobilisable pool of PF4 in health and atherosclerosis. Thromb Res 1984, 51: 354-357.Google Scholar
  59. Cella G, Colby SI, Taylor AD, McCracken L, Parisi AF, Sasahara AA: Platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin-released platelet factor 4 (HR-PF4) in patients with cardiovascular disorders. Thromb Res 1983, 29: 499-509. 10.1016/0049-3848(83)90345-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Sadayasu T, Nakashima Y, Yashiro A, Kawashima T, Kuroiwa A: Heparin-releasable platelet factor 4 in patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 1991, 14: 725-729. 10.1002/clc.4960140906PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Abe S, Maruyama I, Arima S, Yamaguchi H, Okino H, Hamasaki S, Nomoto K, Tahara M, Atsuchi Y: Increased heparin-releasable platelet factor 4 and D dimer in patients one month after the onset of acute myocardial infarction:persistent activation of platelets and the coagulation/fibrinolytic system. Int J Cardiol 1994, 47: S7-S12. 10.1016/0167-5273(94)90320-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Horsewood P, Simpson PJ, Moore JC: Impact of the patient population on the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2000, 96: 1703-1708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Suvarna S, Espinasse B, Qi R, Lubica R, Poncz M, Cines DB, Wiesner MR: Determinants of PF4/heparin immunogenicity. Blood 2007, 110: 4253-4260. 10.1182/blood-2007-08-105098PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Warkentin TE, Cook RJ, Marder VJ, Greinacher A: Anti-PF4/heparin antibody formation postorthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis: the role of non-drug risk factors and evidence for a stoichiometry-based model of immunization. J Thromb Haemost 2010, 8: 504-512. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03735.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Rauova L, Zhai L, Kowalska MA, Arepally GM, Cines DB, Poncz M: Role of platelet surface PF4 antigenic complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathogenesis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Blood 2006, 107: 2346-2353. 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3122PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Cines DB, Rauova L, Arepally G, Reilly MP, McKenzie SE, Sachais BS, Poncz M: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an autoimmune disorder regulated through dynamic autoantigen assembly/disassembly. J Clin Apher 2007, 22: 31-36. 10.1002/jca.20109PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Bauer TL, Arepally GM, Konkle BA, Mestichelli B, Shapiro SS, Cines DB, Poncz M, McNulty S, Amiral J, Hauck WW: Prevalence of heparin-associated antibodies without thrombosis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Circulation 1997, 95: 1242-1246. 10.1161/01.CIR.95.5.1242PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Pouplard C, May MA, Iochmann S, Amiral J, Vissac AM, Marchand M, Gruel Y: Antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin: Clinical implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Circulation 1999, 99: 2530-2536. 10.1161/01.CIR.99.19.2530PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Trossaert M, Gaillard A, Commin PL, Amiral J, Vissac A, Fressinaud E: High incidence of anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Br J Haematol 1998, 101: 653-655. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00750.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Greinacher A, Farner B, Kroll H, Kohlmann T, Warkentin TE, Eichler P: Clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia including risk factors for thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2005, 94: 132-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Jackson MR, Neilson WJ, Lary M, Baay P, Web K, Clagett GP: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis after intraoperative heparin anticoagulation: four case reports. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006, 40: 67-70. 10.1177/153857440604000109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Omran AS, Karim A, Ahmadi H, Yazdanifard P: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting with multiple arteriovenous thromboses: case report. J Med Case Reports 2007, 1: 131-136. 10.1186/1752-1947-1-131PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Rice L, Attisha WK, Drexler A, Francis JL: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Ann Intern Med 2002, 136: 210-215. 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Shah MR, Spencer JP: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurring after discontinuation of heparin. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003, 16: 148-150. 10.3122/jabfm.16.2.148PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Smythe MA, Stephens JL, Mattson JC: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 45: 417-419. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Warkentin TE, Kelton JG: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135: 502-506. 10.7326/0003-4819-135-7-200110020-00009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Rauova L, Hirsch JD, Greene TK, Zhai L, Hayes VM, Kowalska MA: Monocyte-bound PF4 in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010, 116: 5021-5031. 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276964PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Prechel MM, Jeske WP, Walenga JM: Physiological changes in membrane-expressed platelet factor 4: implications in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 2010, 125: e143-e148. 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.10.021PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Poncz M, Rauova L, Cines DB: The role of surface PF4:glycosaminoglycan complexes in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2006, 35: 46-49. 10.1159/000093543PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Cines DB, Tomaski A, Tannenbaum S: Immune endothelial-cell injury in heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 1987, 316: 581-589. 10.1056/NEJM198703053161004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Singer RL, Mannion JD, Bauer TL, Armenti FR, Edie RN: Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Chest 1993, 104: 1436-1440. 10.1378/chest.104.5.1436PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Makhoul RG, Greenberg CS, McCann RL: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: a serious clinical problem and potential solution. J Vasc Surg 1986, 4: 522-528.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Boshkov LK, Warkentin TE, Hayward CP, Andrew M, Kelton JG: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: clinical and laboratory studies. Br J Haematol 1993, 84: 322-328. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1993.tb03072.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Liu JC, Lewis BE, Steen LH, Grassman ED, Bakhos M, Blakeman B, Wrona L, Leya F: Patency of coronary artery bypass grafts in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Am J Cardiol 2002, 89: 979-981. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02252-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Tremblay DM, Harris PG, Gagnon AR, Cordoba C, Brutus JP, Nikolis A: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome as a cause of flap failure: a report of two cases. J Plas Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008, 61: 78-83. 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.12.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Refaai MA, Warkentin TE, Axelson M, Matevosyan K, Sarade R: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism, and cerebral venous thrombosis: A consequence of heparin "flushes". Thromb Haemost 2007, 98: 1139-1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Amiral J, Vissac AM: Role of heparin-dependent antigens in immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia. 4th edition. Edited by: Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007:131-147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Warkentin TE, Heddle NM: Laboratory diagnosis of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Curr Hematol Rep 2003, 2: 148-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Cuker A, Arepally G, Crowther MA, Rice L, Datko F, Hook K, Propert KJ, Kuter DJ, Ortel TL, Konkle BA: The HIT expert probability (HEP) score: a novel pre-test probability model for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinoin. J Thromb Haemost 2010, 8: 2642-2650. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04059.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Messmore HL, Fabbrini N, Bird ML, Choudhury AM, Cerejo M, Prechel M, Jeske WP, Siddiqui A, Theti I, Wehrmacher WH: Simple scoring system for early management of heparin-induced thrombocytopia. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011, 17: 197-201. 10.1177/1076029610387126PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Greinacher A, Alban S, Omer-Adam MA, Weitschies W, Warkentin TE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings. Thromb Res 2008, 122: 211-220. 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.11.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Kelton JG, Smith JW, Warkentin TE, Hayward CPM, Demonne GA, Horsewood P: Immunoglobulin G from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia binds to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Blood 1994, 83: 3232-3239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Maccarana M, Lindahl U: Model of interaction between platelet factor 4 and heparin. Glycobiology 1993, 3: 271-277. 10.1093/glycob/3.3.271PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Visentin G, Moghaddam M, Beery SE, McFarland JG, Aster RH: Heparin is not required for detection of antibodies associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis. J Lab Clin Med 2001, 138: 22-31. 10.1067/mlc.2001.115525PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Horne MK, Alkins BR: Platelet binding of IgG from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Lab Clin Med 1996, 127: 435-442. 10.1016/S0022-2143(96)90060-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Suvarna S, Arepally G: Optimization of a murine immunization model for study of PF4/heparin antibodies. J Thromb Haemost 2009, 7: 857-864. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03330.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Rauova L, Poncz M, McKenzie SE, Reilly MP, Arepally G, Weisel JW, Nagaswami C, Cines DB, Sachais BS: Ultralarge complexes of heparin and PF4 are central to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2005, 105: 131-138. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1544PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Bock PE, Luscombe M, Marshall SE, Pepper DS, Holbrook JJ: The multiple complexes formed by the interaction of platelet factor 4 with heparin. Biochem J 1980, 191: 769-776.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Greinacher A, Gopinadhan M, Gunther J, Omer-Adam MA, Strobel U, Warkentin TE, Papastravrou G, Weitschies W, Helm CA: Close approximation of two platelet factor 4 tetramers by charge neutralization forms the antigens recognized by HIT antibodies. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006, 26: 2386-2393. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000238350.89477.88PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Mikhailov D, Young JC, Linhardt RJ, Mayo KH: Heparin dodecasaccharide binding to platelet factor-4 and growth related protein-α. Induction of a partially folded state and implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Biol Chem 1999, 274: 25317-25329. 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25317PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Mayo KH, Ilyina E, Roongta V, Dundas M, Joseph J, Lai DK, Malone T, Daly TJ: Heparin binding to platelet factor-4. An NMR and site-directed mutagenesis study: arginine residues are crucial for binding. Biochem J 1995, 312: 357-365.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Martel M, Lee J, Wells PS: Risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis. Blood 2005, 2710.Google Scholar
  103. Greinacher A, Eichler P, Lietz T, Warkentin TE: Replacement of unfractionated heparin by low-molecular-weight heparin for postorthopedic surgery antithrombotic prophylaxis lowers the overall risk of symptomatic thrombosis because of a lower frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2005, 106: 2921-2922. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1824PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Warkentin TE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopeina: pathogenesis and management. Br J Haematol 2003, 121: 535-555. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04334.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Motokawa S, Takafumi T, Maeda Y, Maeda K, Jiuchi Y, Yamaguchi T, Someya S, Shindo H, Migita K: IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and symptomatic DVT in orthopedic surgery patients receiving different anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12: 22-29. 10.1186/1471-2474-12-22PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Warkentin TE, Cook RJ, Marder VJ, Sheppard JI, Moore JC, Eriksson BI, Greinacher A, Kelton JG: Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in orthopedic surgery patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin. Blood 2005, 106: 3791-3796. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1938PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Savi P, Chong BH, Griesmacher A, Gruel Y, Kelton JG, Warkentin TE, Eichler P, Meuleman D, Petitou M, Herault J-P: Effect of fondaparinux on platelet activation in the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies: a blinded comparative multicenter study with unfractionated heparin. Blood 2005, 105: 139-144. 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Warkentin TE: Fondaparinux: does it cause HIT? Can it treat HIT? Expert Rev Hematol 2010, 3: 567-581. 10.1586/ehm.10.54PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Cauwenberghs S, Feijge MAH, Hageman G, Hoylearts M, Akkeman JN, Curvers J, Heemskerk JWM: Plasma ectonucleotidases prevent desensitization of purinergic receptors in stored platelets: importance for platelet activity during thrombus formation. Transfusion 2006, 46: 1018-1028. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00837.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Lane DA, Denton J, Flynn AM, Thunberg L, Lindahl U: Anticoagluant activities of heparin oligosaccharides and their neutralization by platelet factor 4. Biochem J 1984, 218: 725-732.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Padilla A, Gray E, Pepper DS, Barrowcliffe TW: Inhibition of thrombin generation by heparin and low molecular weight (LMW) heparins in the absence and presence of platelet factor 4 (PF4). Br J Haematol 1992, 82: 406-413. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb06437.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Levy JH, Cormack JG, Morales A: Heparin neutralization by recombinant platelet factor 4 and protamine. Anest Analg 1995, 81: 35-37.Google Scholar
  113. Kadidal VV, Mayo KH, Horne MK: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) due to heparin flushes: a report of three cases. J Intern Med 1999, 246: 325-329. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00527.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Dai MS, Hsieh AT, Chao TY: Catastrophic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis syndrome related to the use of a Port-A-Cath in a breast cancer patient receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2004, 12: 537-539.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Amiral J, Bridey F, Wolf M, Boyer-Neumann C, Fressinaud E, Vissac M, Peynaud-Debayle E, Dreyfus M, Meyer D: Antibodies to macromolecular platelet factor 4-heparin complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A study of 44 cases. Thromb Haemost 1995, 73: 21-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Jeske WP, Jay AM, Haas S, Walenga JM: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenic potential of GAG and non-GAG antithrombotic agents. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1999, 5(1):556-562.Google Scholar
  117. Capitanio AM, Niewiarowski S, Rucinski B, Tuszynski GP, Cierniewski CS, Kornecki E: Interaction of platelet factor 4 with human platelets. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985, 839: 161-173. 10.1016/0304-4165(85)90033-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Pötschke C, Selleng S, Bröker BM, Greinacher A: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: further evidence for a unique immune response. Blood 2012, 120: 4238-4245. 10.1182/blood-2012-04-419424PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Cerutti A, Puga I, Cols M: Innate control of B cell responses. Trends Immunol 2011, 32: 202-211. 10.1016/j.it.2011.02.004PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Krauel K, Potschke C, Weber C, Kessler W, Furll B, Ittermann T, Maier S, Hammerschmidt S, Broker BM, Greinacher A: Platelet factor 4 binds to bacteria inducing antibodies cross-reacting with the major antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2011, 117: 1370-1378. 10.1182/blood-2010-08-301424PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Krauel K, Weber C, Brandt S, Zähringer U, Mamat U, Greinacher A, Hammerschmidt S: Platelet factor 4 binding to lipid A of Gram-negative bacteria exposes PF4/heparin-like epitopes. Blood 2012, 120: 3345-3352. 10.1182/blood-2012-06-434985PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Clemetson KJ: Platelets and pathogens. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 67: 495-498. 10.1007/s00018-009-0204-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Levy O: Antimicrobial proteins and peptides of blood: templates for novel antimicrobial agents. Blood 2000, 96: 2664-2672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Tang YQ, Yeaman MR, Selsted ME: Antimicrobial peptides from human platelets. Infect Immun 2002, 70: 6524-6533. 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6524-6533.2002PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Yeaman MR, Yount NY, Waring AJ, Gank KD, Kupferwasser D, Wiese R, Bayer AS, Welch WH: Modular determinants of antimicrobial activity in platelet factor-4 family kinocidins. Biochem Biophys Acta 2007, 1768: 609-619. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.11.010PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Eliasson M, Egesten A: Antibacterial chemokines - actors in both innate and adaptive immunity. Contrib Microbiol 2008, 15: 101-117.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. McMorran BJ, Wieczorski L, Drysdale KE, Chan JA, Huang HM, Smith C, Mitiku C, Beeson JG, Burgio G, Foote SJ: Platelet factor 4 and Duffy antigen required for platelet killing of Plasmodium falciparum . Science 2012, 338: 1348-1351. 10.1126/science.1228892PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Love M, Millholland MG, Mishra S, Kulkarni S, Freeman KB, Pan W, Kavash RW, Costanzo MJ, Jo H, Daly TM: Platelet factor 4 activity against P . falciparum and its translation to nonpeptidic mimics as antimalarials. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 12: 815-823. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.017PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Yeaman MR, Yount NY: Unifying themes in host defence effector polypeptides. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007, 5: 727-740. 10.1038/nrmicro1744PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Arepally GM, Hursting MJ: Platelet factor 4/heparin antibody (IgG/M/A) in healthy subjects: a literature analysis of commercial immunoassay results. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2008, 26: 55-61. 10.1007/s11239-008-0217-yPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Hursting MJ, Pai PJ, McCracken JE, Hwang F, Suvarna S, Lokhnygina Y, Bandarenko N, Arepally GM: Platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in blood bank donors. Am J Clin Pathol 2010, 134: 774-780. 10.1309/AJCPG0MNR5NGKNFXPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Greinacher A, Holtfreter B, Krauel K, Gatke D, Weber C, Itterman T, Hammerschmidt S, Kocher T: Association of natural anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies with periodontal disease. Blood 2011, 118: 1395-1401. 10.1182/blood-2011-03-342857PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Warkentin TE, Makris M, Jay AM, Kelton JG: A spontaneous prothrombotic disorder resembling heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Am J Med 2008, 121: 632-636. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Ahmed A, Al-Mondhiry H, Milling TJ Jr, Campbell D: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with massive intracardiac thrombosis: a case report. Case Report Hematol 2012.Google Scholar
  135. Kerendi F, Thourani VH, Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Osgood M, Guyton RA, Lattouf OM: Impact of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia on postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007, 84: 1548-1555. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.080PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Olah Z, Kerenyi A, Kappelmayer J, Schlammadinger A, Razso K, Boda Z: Rapid-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Platelets 2012, 23: 495-498. 10.3109/09537104.2011.650245PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Yeaman MR: Platelets in defense against bacterial pathogens. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 67: 525-544. 10.1007/s00018-009-0210-4PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Coffman RL, Sher A, Seder RA: Vaccine adjuvants: putting innate immunity to work. Immunity 2010, 33: 492-503. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.002PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Bachmann MF, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM: T helper cell-independent neutralizing B cell response against vesicular stomatitis virus: role of antigen patterns in B cell induction. Eur J Immunol 1995, 25: 3445-3451. 10.1002/eji.1830251236PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Medzhitov R, Janeway CA: Innate immunity: the virtues of a nonclonal system of recognition. Cell 1997, 91: 295-298. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80412-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Mutwiri G, Gerdts V, Lopez M, Babuik LA: Innate immunity and new adjuvants. Rev Sci Tech 2007, 26: 147-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Pone EJ, Zan H, Zhang J, Al-Qahtani A, Xu Z, Casali P: Toll-like receptors and B-cell receptors synergize to induce immunoglobulin class switch DNA recombination: relevance to microbial antibody response. Crit Rev Immunol 2012, 30: 1-29. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-100311-102839View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Steinhagen F, Kinjo T, Bode C, Klinman DM: TLR-based immune adjuvants. Vaccine 2011, 29: 3341-3355. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.002PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Amiral J, Marfaing-Koka M, Wolf M, Alessi MC, Tardy B, Boyer-Neumann C, Vissac AM, Fressinaud E, Poncz M, Meyer D: Presence of autoantibodies to interleukin-8 or neutrophil-activating peptide-2 in patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. Blood 1996, 88: 410-416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Chudasama SL, Espinasse B, Hwang F, Qi R, Joglekar M, Afonina G, Wiesner MR, Welsby IJ, Ortel T, Arepally GM: Heparin modifies the immunogenicity of positively-charged proteins. Blood 2010, 116: 6046-6053. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-292938PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Amiral JJ, Vissac AM: Pseudo-HIT associated with antibodies to protamine sulfate. J Thromb Haemost 2009, 5(2):697.Google Scholar
  147. Xu W, Santini PA, Matthews AJ, Chiu A, Plebain A, He B, Chen K, Cerutti A: Viral double-sranded RNA triggers Ig Class switching by activating upper respiratory mucosa B cells through an innate TLR3 pathway involving BAFF. J Immunol 2008, 181: 276-287.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Prechel MM, Walenga JM: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an update. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012, 38: 483-496.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Cines DB, McCrae KR, Zheng XL, Sachais BS, Prak EL, Siegel DL: Antigen and substrate withdrawal in the management of autoimmune thrombotic disorders. Blood 2012, 120: 4134-4142. 10.1182/blood-2012-06-389445PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Tanhehco Y, Rux AH, Sachais BS: Low-density lipoprotein apheresis reduces platelet factor 4 on the surface of platelets: a possible protective mechanism against heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Transfusion 2011, 51: 1022-1029. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02911.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Sachais BS, Litvinov RI, Yarovoi SV, Rauova L, Hinds JL, Rux AH, Arepally GM, Poncz M, Cuker A, Weisel JW: Dynamic antibody-binding properties in the pathogenesis of HIT. J Thromb Haemost 2012, 120: 1137-1142.Google Scholar
  152. Sachais BS, Rux AH, Cines DB, Yarovoi SV, Garner LI, Watson SP, Hinds JL, Rux JJ: Rational design and characterization of platelet factor 4 antagonists for the study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2012, 119: 5955-5962. 10.1182/blood-2012-01-406801PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Aster RH: "Inactivating" PF4: a new approach to HIT treatment? Blood 2012, 119: 5951-5952. 10.1182/blood-2012-04-422535PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Fryer A, Huang Y, Rao G, Jacoby D, Mancilla E, Whorton R, Piantadosi CA, Kennedy T, Hoidal J: Selective O-desulfation produces nonanticoagulant heparin that retains pharmacological activity in the lung. J Pharm Exp Therapeut 1997, 282: 208-219.Google Scholar
  155. Rao NV, Argyle B, Xu X, Reynolds PR, Walenga JM, Prechel MM, Prestwich GD, MacArthur RB, Walters BB, Hoidal JR: Low anticoagulant heparin targets multiple sites of inflammation, suppresses heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and inhibits interaction of RAGE with its ligands. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010, 299: C97-C110. 10.1152/ajpcell.00009.2010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Krauel K, Hackbarth C, Fürll B, Greinacher A: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: in vitro studies on the interaction of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and low-sulfated heparin, with platelet factor 4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Blood 2012, 119: 1248-1255. 10.1182/blood-2011-05-353391PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Joglekar MF, Quintana Diaz PM, Marcus S, Qi R, Espinasse B, Wiesner MR, Pempe E, Liu J, Monroe DM, Arepally GM: Disruption of PF4/H multimolecular complex formation with a minimally anticoagulant heparin (ODSH). Thromb Haemost 2012, 107: 717-725. 10.1160/TH11-11-0795PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Barrowcliffe TW, Merton RE, Havercroft SJ, Thunberg L, Lindahl U, Thomas DP: Low-affinity heparin potentiates the action of high-affinity heparin oligosaccharides. Thromb Res 1984, 34: 125-133. 10.1016/0049-3848(84)90069-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Greinacher A: Taking advantage of the non-anticoagulant effects of heparin. Blood 2012, 107: 717.Google Scholar
  160. Barry WH, Kennedy TP: Heparins with reduced anti-coagulant activity reduce myocardial reperfusion injury. Rec Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2011, 6: 148-157. 10.2174/157489011795933855View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Prechel and Walenga; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement