Open Access

Deep venous thrombosis in the antenatal period in a large cohort of pregnancies from western India

  • Sonal Vora1,
  • Kanjaksha Ghosh1Email author,
  • Shrimati Shetty1,
  • Vinita Salvi2 and
  • Purnima Satoskar3
Thrombosis Journal20075:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-5-9

Received: 29 March 2007

Accepted: 04 July 2007

Published: 04 July 2007

Abstract

Background

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is an important complication in the peripartal and postpartal period.

Methods

We followed up prospectively the prevalence of DVT in 34720 prenatal mothers between June 2002 and July 2006 attending the antenatal clinics of two major hospitals in Mumbai, India. Thirty two women (0.1%) presented for the first time with symptomatic DVT i.e. 17 in the first trimester, 6 in the second and 9 in the third trimester of pregnancy. Nine had history of fetal loss while in the remaining twenty three there was no history of fetal loss.

Results

The evaluation of both acquired and heritable thrombophilia showed a conglomeration of thrombophilia in this group when compared to 100 normal pregnant women who have given birth to at least one healthy baby with no history of fetal death, DVT or other obstetrical complications. The relative risks for all the antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) studied i.e lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG/IgM antibodies for cardiolipin (ACA), β2 glycoprotein 1 (β2 GP 1) and annexin V were significantly higher in women with pregnancy associated DVT (RR 7.4 95% CI 4.3–11.3 P < 0.05). Among the genetic thrombophilia markers studied, Protein S (PS) deficiency was the strongest risk factor (RR 5.00 95% CI 3.02–5.00 P < 0.05) followed by factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation (RR 4.57 95% CI 2.23–4.57 P < 0.05) and PAI 4G/4G homozygosity (RR 3.24 95% CI 1.85–5.12 P < 0.05). Protein C (PC) and endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) 23 bp insertion polymorphism was also increased in the patient group as compared to controls but the difference was not statistically significant. The MTHFR C677T, fibrinogen gene β448 Arg/Lys polymorphisms were not significantly different from the normal controls, while antithrombin III (AT III) deficiency and PT G20210A polymorphism were absent in both controls and patients. Two or more risk factors were present in 22 out of 32 cases (68.75%).

Conclusion

We conclude that the prevalence of DVT in India is more or less similar to other reports published and both acquired and heritable thrombophilia show strong association with DVT associated with pregnancy.

Background

The incidence of venous thrombosis in pregnant women is approximately 1 in 1000 – 20000 pregnancies [1]. It is an uncommon but the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in antenatal women.

During normal pregnancy, a series of changes take place in the coagulant and anti-coagulant pathways of blood coagulation as well as in the fibrinolytic pathway [2, 3]. The plasma concentration of several proteins and their activities change and there is a hemostatic imbalance towards a prothrombotic state. Placenta and myometrium also contribute to a high concentration of a specific fibrinolytic inhibitor i.e PAI II during normal pregnancy [4]. In addition, the hormonal changes which occur during pregnancy tilt the thrombohaemorrhagic balance towards thrombosis to prevent severe postpartal blood loss. In spite of all these changes postpartal venous thrombosis is several times more common than antenatal venous thrombosis [5, 6].

The presence of thrombophilia is an added risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy. Except one report on postpartal cerebral venous thrombosis [7] there are no data on the prevalence of DVT during pregnancy in India. Neither there are any data on the risk assessment in women presenting with DVT for the first time during pregnancy. The present study was thus aimed at finding the prevalence and the risk associated with VTE in antenatal mothers attending two of the largest hospitals in Mumbai during the last four years.

Methods

Patients

The study was carried out between June 2002 and July 2006 on 34720 pregnant women attending the outpatient Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KEM Hospital and Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India. Clinical examination for symptomatic DVT was carried out by two Gynaecologists independently. DVT was documented by venography, Doppler ultrasound angiography, or MRI. None of the patients with confirmed DVT were neither receiving any anticoagulant therapy at the time of study. Only two patients had positive family history of DVT among first degree relatives.

Controls

One hundred unrelated age matched pregnant women with the same ethnic background as that of the pregnant women with DVT were selected as controls for this study. Majority of them were Marathas while very few were Gujaratis, South Indians, Muslims and others, in both the groups. The control group included more or less equal numbers in the first second and third trimesters. None of the controls had a previous history of miscarriage or pregnancy complications and had at least one healthy baby at the time of this study. Women with endocrinological dysfunction, chromosomal abnormalities, autoimmune disease, liver dysfunction were excluded from both the patient and control group.

None of the patients who had DVT and the controls had any other confounding factors like smoking or history of taking oral contraceptives.

The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee.

Methods

Blood was collected in 3.13% trisodium citrate (9:1 blood to anticoagulant). The platelet poor plasma was separated by centrifuging at 2000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The plasma was aliquoted and stored at -70°C till tested. The cell pellet was preserved at -20°C for DNA extraction.

Screening coagulation tests (PT, APTT, TT) and fibrinogen assays were performed in a semi-automated coagulation analyzer (ST ART, Diagnostica Stago, Asniers, France). Plasma AT III was measured in a fully automated STA coagulation analyzer (STA Compact, Diagnositica Stago, France). ACLA (IgG, IgM), β2 GP1 (IgG/IgM), Annexin V (IgG/IgM) antibodies were measured by ELISA using commercial kits (Varelisa, Freiburg. Pharmacia). Protein C, total protein S were also measured by ELISA [Diagnostica Stago, Asniers, France]. The presence of lupus anticoagulant was assessed according to the criteria of International Society of Thrombosis & Hemostasis [8] by using screening and confirmatory reagents LA1 & LA2 (Dade Behring, Marburg Germany), Kaolin clotting time and dilute PT tests.

DNA was extracted as described earlier [9] from the cell pellet. Factor V Leiden, PT gene, MTHFR, Fibrinogen gene, EPCR and PAI 4G/5G polymorphisms were studied as described in earlier reports [1015] with or without specific restriction enzyme digestion.

The assays for all the APA were repeated at least once with a minimum time interval of 3 months between the two tests while the PC, PS and AT III tests were also repeated again at least 3 months after the delivery and only the post delivery results were considered.

Statistical analysis

Relative risks (RR), 95% CI and P values were estimated separately for each parameter and for the total number of samples using SPSS10 software.

Results

Thirty two out of 34720 women presented with DVT during pregnancy giving a prevalence of 0.1% in this series. Seventeen presented with DVT in the first trimester, six in the second while 9 presented in the third trimester.

The sites of thrombosis among 32 women presented with DVT are shown in table 1.
Table 1

Sites of thrombosis in women with pregnancy associated DVT.

Site of thrombosis

Number (%)

Lower limb DVT

with fetal loss

09 (28.1)

 

without fetal loss

13 (40.6)

 

Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) + DVT

02 (6.25)

Cortical venous thrombosis

03 (9.3)

Budd Chiary syndrome

02 (6.25)

Gangrene

01 (3.1)

Retinal vascular obstruction

01 (3.1)

Infra renal segment thrombosis

01 (3.1)

The majority of the patients (75%) had lower limb DVT out of which 9 had history of fetal loss. Three women had cortical venous thrombosis while two were cases of Budd chiary syndrome. Retinal and renal vein thrombosis was observed in one case each and one was a case of gangrene.

The prevalence of acquired and genetic thrombophilia is shown in tables 2 &3.
Table 2

Prevalence of different antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnant women with DVT and normal pregnant controls

APA

Patients (n = 32) Number positive (%)

Controls (n = 100) Number positive (%)

RR (95% CI)

P value

LA

4 (12.5)

0

3.6 (1.6–4.5)

0.003

ACLA

10 (31.25)

1 (1)

4.5 (2.7–5.5)

0

β2 GP 1

2 (6.25)

1 (1)

2.1 (0.6–3.7)

0.22

Annexin V

5 (15.63)

1 (1)

3.8 (1.9–4.6)

0.003

LA/ACLA/β2 GP 1/Annexin V

12 (37.5)

3 (3)

7.4 (4.3–11.3)

0

Table 3

Genetic thrombophilia markers in patients and controls

Thrombophilia marker

Patients (n = 32) Number positive (%)

Controls (n = 100) Number positive (%)

RR (95% CI)

P value

FVL Het

4 (12.5)

0

4.0 (1.8–4.5)

0.001

PT G20210A

0

0

-

-

EPCR Hets

1 (3.13)

1 (1)

2.0 (0.3–3.8)

0.392

MTHFR homo

1 (3.13)

1 (1)

2.0 (0.3–3.8)

0.392

MTHFR hetero

6 (18.75)

12 (12)

1.46 (0.6–2.7)

0.333

Fib β448 homo

1(3.13)

1(1)

2.0 (0.3–3.8)

0.392

Fib β448 hetero

5 (15.63)

12 (12)

1.2 (0.5–2.5)

0.594

PAI 4G/4G

13 (40.63)

10 (10)

3.2 (1.8–5.1)

0

   4G/5G

12 (37.5)

61 (61)

0.4 (0.2–0.8)

0.020

   5G/5G

5 (15.63)

29 (29)

0.5 (0.2–1.1)

0.132

PC Def

1 (3.13)

0

2.8 (0.5–4.1)

0.223

P S Def

7 (21.88)

0

4.6 (2.6–5.6)

0

AT III Def

0

0

-

-

The IgG and IgM antibodies for ACLA and β2GPI were detected in 31.25% and 6.25% respectively while the prevalence of LA and anti annexin antibodies was found to be 12.5% and 15.63% respectively in the patients. In case of controls the prevalence of APA antibodies was 1% each for ACLA, β2GPI and annexin V while LA was not detected in any of the controls. Overall, 37.5% of the patients were found to be positive for any of the antiphospholipid antibodies/LA as against 3% among the normal pregnancy controls (RR 7.4 95% CI 4.3 – 11.3 P < 0.05).

Among the genetic thrombophilia markers, the heterozygous carrier rate for factor V Leiden was 12.5% as against 0% in controls (RR 4.57 95% CI 2.23–4.57 P < 0.05) while the frequency of EPCR and PAI 4G/4G homozygous state were 3.13% (RR 2.0; 95% CI 0.3–3.8 P NS) and 40.63 % (RR 3.2 ; 95% CI 1.8–5.1 P < 0.05), respectively. No difference in the prevalence was obtserved in case of MTHFR and fibrinogen gene polymorphisms between the controls and patients. Among the natural anticoagulants, protein S deficiency was a significant marker with 21.88% of the patients showing his deficiency (RR 4.6; 95% CI 2.6 – 5.6 P < 0.05) while Protein C deficiency was found to in one case (3.13%; RR 2.8 ; 95% CI 0.5–4.1 P NS). None of the cases and controls showed the presence of AT III deficiency and PT G20210A polymorphism.

Twenty two out of 32 (68.75%) patients showed the presence of two or more risk factors.

Discussion

Pregnancy associated thrombosis is not a new condition as case reports of Phlegmasia Alba dolens (white leg of pregnancy) and Phlegmasia Coerulea dolens (Blue leg of pregnancy) can be found in text books of Obstetrics and Gynaecology since more than 70 years. However with introduction of more tests for thrombophilia markers and the ability to assess the variable relative risks of thrombosis associated with various thrombophilia markers along with better understanding of thrombohaemorrhagic balance in different thrombotic conditions, the subject is now being studied with renewed enthusiasm.

Maternal morbidity in India is quite high i.e around 4–5% [16, 17]. Though the major cause of maternal morbidity in western countries is venous thromboembolism, in India haemorrhage, sepsis, complications during delivery, severe anaemia and toxaemia are the major causes of perinatal mortality [18, 19]. Except one report on puerperial cerebral venous thrombosis [7], there is no data on the prevalence or the risk assessment for thrombosis during pregnancy from India.

Previous studies from western literature have reported incidence rates ranging from 18–95 events per 100000 women years during pregnancy [2022]. The incidence in the present study is more or less the same. Moreover, the incidence of DVT in the present study is of symptomatic DVT and thus the prevalence obtained in the present study must be regarded as the minimum incidence rate. All these women have been followed up until delivery and those women who failed follow up have not been included in the study.

Presence of acquired thrombophilia i.e ACLA, β2 GPI and anti annexin V antibodies was observed in 37.5% of the women with a first objectivity confirmed episode of DVT in pregnancy with or without history of fetal loss. The relative risk for women with APA was much higher in pregnant women with DVT than that found in the normal control pregnant women.

Among the genetic thrombophilia, factor V Leiden mutation has been found to be the strongest risk factor as has been observed in several other studies [2325]. The prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation in our general population and in deep vein thrombosis cases has been reported to be 2.3% and 2.6%, respectively [26]. In comparison, the mutation seems to be a strong risk factor in pregnant women presenting with DVT for the first time. The PT gene G20210A polymorphism has not been found in our control population or the disease groups thus is either extremely rare or nonexistent. The MTHFR C677T, fibrinogen β448 gene polymorphisms were not significantly different between the patients and the controls. The fibrinolysis gene polymorphism i,e PAI 4G/5G insertion/deletion – 675 bp upstream from the transcription start site has been found to play a key role with regulation of fibrinolysis and a few studies have shown an increased prevalence of 4G/4G polymorphism in cases of RSA [27]. Even in this study, 4G/4G homozygosity has been found to be a strong risk factor for DVT in pregnancy. Among the blood coagulation inhibitors i.e. PC, PS & ATIII deficiency, PS deficiency has been found to be strongly associated with DVT in pregnancy. PS deficiency has also been strongly linked to late pregnancy loss in several studies [28]. Another important information from this study is the presence of two or more factors causing thrombophilia in 22 out of 32 patients studied. The effect of pregnancy on some of the plasma factors like PC, PS and AT III has been ruled out by repeating these assays again at least 3 months after delivery.

In more than half of the women, DVT events occurred in the first trimester of the pregnancy. Higher frequency of DVT events has been reported during the first 15 weeks gestation [28]. Higher frequency of thromboembolic events in the first trimester of pregnancy provides an additional clue that when thromboprophylactic therapy has to be initiated it should begin much earlier in the pregnancy.

In pregnant women the common site of thrombosis was left leg. In a meta analysis published earlier it has been reported that about 82% of the objectively diagnosed DVT occurred in the left lower extremity. Though the exact cause is not known, anatomic reasons have been postulated [29, 30].

What are the clinical implications of such a study? The important question always raised is whether all women with thrombophilia needs to be anticoagulated during pregnany. Anticoagulation therapy is certainly effective in reducing the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with thrombophilia and one episode of DVT or history of idiopathic fetal loss. But is it justified to anticoagulate women with thrombophilia without any such adverse events as there are quite a few women who are carriers of thrombophilia and have successful pregnancy outcomes. Whether there should be an evaluation case by case or whether tailored therapy should be advised for specific thrombophilia need to be investigated. We still do not understand in quantitative terms why different thrombophilia markers have different impact in producing thrombosis. All these will remain as queries only until there are large studies on different antithrombotic modalities in prospective clinical trials.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Haemostasis, Institute of Immunohaematology (ICMR), KEM Hospital
(2)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KEM Hospital
(3)
Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Prevalence of venous thrombosis and embolism. JAMA 1986, 256: 744-749. 10.1001/jama.256.6.744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Greer IA: Haemostasis and thrombosis in pregnancy. Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Volume 2. Edited by: Bloom AL, Forbes CD, Thomas DP, Tuddenham EGD. Edinburg, Scotland: Churchil Livingstone; 1994:987-1015.Google Scholar
  3. Bonnar J: Hemostasis and coagulation disorders in pregnancy. Hemostasis and Thrombosis. 2nd edition. Edited by: Bloom AL, Thomas DP. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1987:570-584.Google Scholar
  4. Uszynski M, Maciejewski K, Uszynski W, Kuczynski J: Placenta and myometrium – the two main sources of fibrinolytic components during pregnancy. Gynaecol Obstet Invest 2001, 52: 189-193. 10.1159/000052971View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Simpson EL, Lawrenson RA, Nightingale AL, Farmer RD: Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 2001, 108: 56-60. 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00004-8Google Scholar
  6. Andersen BS, Srefensen FH, Sorensen HT, Nielsen GL, Olsen J: The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium – a 11 year Danish population based study of 63,300 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1998, 77: 170-173. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770207.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dindagur N, Kruthika-Vinod TP, Christopher R: Factor V gene A4070G mutation and the risk of cerebral veno-sinus thrombosis occurring during puerperium. Thromb Re 2007, 119: 497-500. 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt JT, Triplett DA, Alving B, Scharrer I: Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update, on behalf of the sub committee on lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibody of the scientific and standardization committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost 1995, 74: 1185-1190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Manniatis T, Fritsch , Sambrook J: Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Cold spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor. NY;Google Scholar
  10. Arruda VR, Annichma-Bizzaahi JM, Costa FF, Reitsma PH: Factor V Leiden (FVQ506) is common in a Brazilian population. Am J Haematol 1995, 49: 242-243. 10.1002/ajh.2830490312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM: A common genetic variation in the 3' untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood 1996, 88: 3698-3703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abbate R, Sardi I, Pepe G, Marcucci R, Brunelli T, Prisco D, Fatini C, Capanni M, Simonetti I, Gensini EF: The high prevalence of thermolabile 5 – 10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in Italians is not associated to an increased risk for CAD. Thromb Haemost 1998, 79: 727-730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumann RE, Henschen AH: Human firbinogen polymorphic site analysis by restriction endonuclease digestion and allele specific polymerase chain reaction amplification, identification of polymorphisms at positions α 312 and β 448. Blood 1993, 82: 2117-2124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Falk G, Svensson H, Almqvist A, Wiman B: Allele specific PCR for detection of a sequencer polymorphims in the promotor region of the plasminogen activator inhibitor – 1 (PAI – 1) gene. Fibrinol 1995, 9: 170-174. 10.1016/S0268-9499(95)80007-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Franchi F, Biguzzi E, Cetin I, Facchette F, Radaelle T, Bazzo M, Pardi G, Faioni M: Mutations in the thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor genes in women with late fetal loss. Br J Haematol 2001, 114: 641-646. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02964.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sinha NK: Maternal and child health in India: a critical review. Health Millions 1995, 21: 37-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rao KB: Maternal mortality in a teaching hospital in southern India. A 13-year study. Obstet Gynecol 1975, 46: 397-400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarin AR, Singla P, Kaur M: Maternal mortality – aetiological factors : analytic study from a teaching hospital of Punjab. Indian J Matern Child Health 1992, 3: 69-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rajaram P, Agrawal A, Swain S: Determinants of maternal mortality – a hospital based study from South India. Ind J Matern Child Health 1995, 6: 7-10.Google Scholar
  20. Armour R, Schwedler M, Kestein MD: Current assessment of thromboembolic disease and pregnancy. Ann Surg 2001, 67: 641-644.Google Scholar
  21. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Leung B, Byrne JD, Hethumimi R, Montoro M: Incidence, clinical characteristics and timing of objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 1999, 94: 730-734. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00426-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Husni EA, Peta LJ, Lenhert AE: Thrombophlebitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1967, 97: 901-905.Google Scholar
  23. Tormene D, Simioni P, Prandoni P, Luni S, Innella B, Sabbion P, et al.: The risk of fetal loss in family members of probands with factor V Leiden mutation. Thromb Haemost 1999, 82: 1237-1239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meinard JR, Middeldorp S, de Kam PJ, Koopman MM, van Pampus EC, Hamulyak K, et al.: Increased risk for fetal loss in carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130: 736-739.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ridker PM, Miletich JP, Buring JE, Ariyo AA, Price DT, Manson JE, Hill JA, et al.: Factor V Leiden as a risk factor for recurrent pregnancy loss. Ann Intern Med 1998, 128: 1000-1003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghosh K, Shetty S, Madkaikar M, Pawar A, Nair S, Khare A, et al.: Venous thromboembolism in young patients from western India: A study. Clin Appl Thromb Haemost 2001, 7: 158-165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Glueck CJ, Kupferminc MJ, Fontaine RN, Wang P, Weksler BB, Eldor A: Genetic hypofibrinolysis in complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynaecol 2001, 97: 44-48. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01094-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne P, Twaddle S, Clark P, Lowe GD, et al.: Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. Br J Haematol 2005, 132: 171-196. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05847.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. James AH, Tapson VF, Goldhaber SZ: Thrombosis during pregnancy and postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 193: 216-219. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ginsberg JS, Brill-Edwards P, Burrows RF, Bona R, Prandoni P, Buller HR, Lensing A: Venous thrombosis during pregnancy: leg and trimester of presentation. Thromb Haemost 1992, 67: 519-520.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vora et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement