Volume 14 Supplement 1

State of the Art 2016: Research and Review from the 9th Congress of the Asian-Pacific Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis

Open Access

Platelets and platelet adhesion molecules: novel mechanisms of thrombosis and anti-thrombotic therapies

  • Xiaohong Ruby Xu1, 2, 3,
  • Naadiya Carrim2, 4,
  • Miguel Antonio Dias Neves2,
  • Thomas McKeown2,
  • Tyler W. Stratton2,
  • Rodrigo Matos Pinto Coelho2,
  • Xi Lei2,
  • Pingguo Chen2, 4,
  • Jianhua Xu5,
  • Xiangrong Dai6, 7,
  • Benjamin Xiaoyi Li6, 7, 8 and
  • Heyu Ni1, 2, 4, 5, 9Email author
Thrombosis Journal201614(Suppl 1):29

DOI: 10.1186/s12959-016-0100-6

Published: 4 October 2016

Abstract

Platelets are central mediators of thrombosis and hemostasis. At the site of vascular injury, platelet accumulation (i.e. adhesion and aggregation) constitutes the first wave of hemostasis. Blood coagulation, initiated by the coagulation cascades, is the second wave of thrombin generation and enhance phosphatidylserine exposure, can markedly potentiate cell-based thrombin generation and enhance blood coagulation. Recently, deposition of plasma fibronectin and other proteins onto the injured vessel wall has been identified as a new “protein wave of hemostasis” that occurs prior to platelet accumulation (i.e. the classical first wave of hemostasis). These three waves of hemostasis, in the event of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, may turn pathogenic, and cause uncontrolled vessel occlusion and thrombotic disorders (e.g. heart attack and stroke). Current anti-platelet therapies have significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality, however, on-treatment thrombotic events, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding complications are still major concerns that continue to motivate innovation and drive therapeutic advances. Emerging evidence has brought platelet adhesion molecules back into the spotlight as targets for the development of novel anti-thrombotic agents. These potential antiplatelet targets mainly include the platelet receptors glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V complex, β3 integrins (αIIb subunit and PSI domain of β3 subunit) and GPVI. Numerous efforts have been made aiming to balance the efficacy of inhibiting thrombosis without compromising hemostasis. This mini-review will update the mechanisms of thrombosis and the current state of antiplatelet therapies, and will focus on platelet adhesion molecules and the novel anti-thrombotic therapies that target them.

Keywords

αIIbβ3 Anfibatide GPIbα GPVI Hemostasis Integrins P-selectin Stroke Thrombosis

Background

Platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation are critical events in hemostasis and thrombosis [13]. Platelet adhesion molecules, αIIbβ3 integrin and the glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V, are essential for these processes [46]. Other adhesion molecules, such as P-selectin, GPVI and cadherins, are also involved [710]. The important roles of adhesion molecules in normal hemostasis have been well demonstrated in bleeding disorders, for example, Glanzmann thrombasthenia (β3 integrin deficiency) [11] and Bernard-Soulier syndrome (GPIb-IX-V complex deficiency) [12]. However, under pathological conditions, excessive platelet function may lead to thrombotic diseases, such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, which cause far more deaths each year than cancer or respiratory diseases [1, 2, 1315]. Therefore, antiplatelet agents are vital for the treatment of thrombosis [16]. For over a decade, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin has been considered a key treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome [17, 18]. Nonetheless, some patients undergoing this combination therapy continue to suffer from recurrent thrombotic events, likely a result of platelet activation and aggregation occurring independently of ADP or thromboxane A2 receptor-mediated signalling pathways [17]. Thus, attenuating platelet adhesion appears to be a desirable strategy in effectively controlling pathological thrombosis [18]. Further understanding of the interactions between platelet adhesion molecules and their binding partners is therefore crucial in developing novel anti-thrombotic therapies. This review briefly summarizes the current knowledge of thrombosis and antiplatelet therapies, introduces a number of major platelet adhesion molecules, and highlights some recent advances in the new mechanisms of thrombosis, and anti-thrombotic therapies that are in clinical trials (unless otherwise indicated). There are several excellent available reviews regarding antiplatelet therapies, such as ADP antagonists (e.g. P2Y12 inhibitors), thromboxane antagonists and PAR-1/4 inhibitors [17, 18]. This mini-review will mainly focus on the therapeutic developments targeting platelet adhesion molecules.

Review

Arterial thrombosis and current state of antiplatelet therapies

Arterial thrombosis at the site of atherosclerotic plaque rupture may lead to uncontrolled vessel occlusion, resulting in life-threatening consequences (e.g. unstable angina, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) [1, 2, 13]. During plaque rupture, subendothelial matrix proteins, like collagen, von Willebrand factor (VWF), fibrinogen, fibronectin and laminin are exposed to circulation, leading to the rapid response of platelets [6]. Inappropriate platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation promote excessive platelet plug formation. Activated platelets can also provide negatively-charged surfaces that harbor coagulation factors and markedly potentiate cell-based thrombin generation and blood coagulation [1, 2, 19, 20]. The evolving concept of the “protein wave of hemostasis” indicates a potential role of platelet-released plasma fibronectin in thrombosis and hemostasis [21, 22]. Thus, platelets are key mediators of atherothrombosis, which are actively involved in all three waves of thrombus formation: protein wave, platelet accumulation, and blood coagulation [21, 23].

Current FDA-approved antiplatelet therapies (Fig. 1) mainly aim to (i) inhibit thromboxane A2 synthesis, which inhibits platelet activation (e.g. aspirin and triflusal); (ii) antagonize the function of platelet P2Y12 receptors, (e.g. clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor); (iii) inhibit platelet integrin αIIbβ3 activity, which inhibits platelet aggregation, (e.g. abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban); (iv) inhibit phosphodiesterase, which increases platelet cAMP/cGMP levels (e.g. dipyridamole and cilostazol) [24]. These antiplatelet drugs have significantly reduced cardiovascular deaths. However, limitations of current therapies, such as weak/poor inhibition of platelet function, excessive bleeding, thrombocytopenia and unexpected platelet activation are concerns that drive therapeutic advances [18, 25, 26]. In 2014, the FDA approved Vorapaxar, a novel antagonist of the thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), which reduces the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients with atherosclerosis or peripheral arterial disease [27, 28]. However, Vorapaxar must not be used in patients who have histories of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or intracranial hemorrhage, since it increases the risk of intracranial bleeding [28, 29].
Fig. 1

Current and novel antiplatlet therapies. Platelet adhesion to an injury site at a vessel wall is mediated by the exposure and binding of subendothelial matrix proteins (e.g. collagen, VWF, fibrinogen, and fibronectin) to glycoprotein (GP) receptors on the platelet surface. VWF binding to the GPIb-IX-V complex, collagen binding to platelet GPVI and integrin α2β1 receptors trigger a signal transduction process resulting in the local release of platelet activation agonists, such as thromboxane A2 and ADP. These agonists along with thrombin produced from coagulation cascades and activated platelets, bind to platelet surface bound G-coupled receptors inducing further platelet activation. Activation of platelet integrin αIIbβ3 induces platelet aggregation mediated by fibrinogen/VWF or the yet undetermined “X” ligands. Leukocyte-platelet adhesion can be driven by the interaction between platelet surface P-selectin and its counter-receptor PSGL-1 situated upon the leukocyte surface. Inhibition of platelet activation is mainly mediated by the PDE/PDE3 regulated degradation and PGI2, NO and GLP-1R regulated activation of cGMP or cAMP. Direct and indirect antithrombotic therapeutics are tabulated in the light colored boxes within the figure. The actions of antithrombotic therapies are depicted using red arrows, and some indirect antithrombotic agents (such as anti-atherosclerotic agents) are represented with purple arrows. Therapeutics, to name a few, listed in black, green, red and purple correspond to FDA-approved, phase III, phase II or preclinical development status, respectively. Numbered inhibitory arrows represent the actions of the correspondingly numbered therapies. Some other anti-platelet agents are not included, more information can be found in references 17, 18 and other publications. Abbreviations: COX-1 cyclooxygenase 1 GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide 1, GLP-1R glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, PAR protease-activated receptor, PDE phosphodiesterase, PSGL-1 P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1, TP thromboxane prostanoid receptor, TXA 2 thromboxane A2; VWF von Willebrand factor

Platelet adhesion molecules in hemostasis and thrombosis: novel mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

Platelet adhesion molecules are proteins/receptors on the platelet surface that interact with other cells or the extracellular matrix, including the integrin family (e.g. α2β1, α5β1, α6β1, αLβ2, αIIbβ3, and ανβ3) [4, 30, 31], the immunoglobulin superfamily (e.g. GPVI, FcγRIIA, ICAM-2, PECAM-1, JAMs and Cadherin 6), the leucine-rich repeat family (LRR; e.g. GPIb-IX-V complex), and the C-type lectin receptor family (e.g. P-selectin and CLEC-2), etc. [3234]. Recent evidence has shown that platelet adhesion molecules play key roles in a variety of pathophysiological processes [23], such as hemostasis and thrombosis [4, 33], immune responses [35, 36], inflammation [3537], atherosclerosis [3840], lymphatic vessel development [4144], angiogenesis [4547], miscarriage [48, 49], and tumor metastasis [5052]. Platelets are versatile cells and the mechanisms of their diverse functions have emerged as hot research topics [23]. This review mainly focuses on their roles in thrombosis and as novel anti-thrombotic targets (Fig. 1).

The GPIb-IX-V complex: emerging targets of antiplatelet therapy

New insights into the GPIb-IX-V complex

Platelet GPIb-IX-V complex (LRR family protein) has approximately 50,000 copies/platelet. It is composed of one GPIbα subunit disulfide-linked to two molecules of GPIbβ, and non-covalently linked with GPIX and GPV in a 2:4:2:1 ratio [53]. GPIb-IX-V is a key platelet receptor in initiating platelet translocation and adhesion to the vessel wall during vascular injury, especially under high shear stress (e.g. in small or stenosed arteries) [54, 55]. Platelet translocation onto the subendothelium is mediated by the binding of GPIbα to the immobilized VWF, a multimeric adhesive protein secreted from activated endothelial cells and platelets. The crystal structure of the GPIbα N-terminal ligand-binding domain and the VWF A1 domain gives useful information regarding their interaction [56]. This interaction induces intracellular signalling events that can activate integrins, leading to platelet stable adhesion and subsequent platelet aggregation. Interestingly, platelet-derived VWF was recently shown not essential for hemostasis and thrombosis, but instead fosters thrombo-inflammatory diseases such as ischemic stroke in mice via a GPIb-dependent mechanism [57]. This suggests that targeting GPIbα-VWF may be a promising anti-thrombotic strategy, particularly in thrombo-inflammatory conditions.

Furthermore, GPIb-IX-V complex has a high affinity for thrombin [58, 59]. Two thrombin binding sites on GPIbα LRR C-terminal flank region have been revealed [58]. Consequently, thrombin can activate platelets via GPIbα in two ways [60]: accelerating the cleavage of PAR-1 and platelet activation [61], or direct signaling via GPIbα, particularly after cleaving GPV, which is generally considered a “brake” in GPIb-IX-V activation [62, 63]. It is currently unknown but it is reasonable to consider that targeting both VWF and thrombin binding sites of GPIbα might provide additional benefits in effectively controlling thrombosis.

GPIbα can also interact with multiple other ligands, leading to platelet activation (e.g. thrombospondin [64] and P-selectin), pro-coagulant activity (e.g. factors XI [65], XII [66], VIIa [67] and kininogen [68]), inflammatory responses (e.g. P-selectin [69, 70], αMβ2 [71]), arterial remodeling [72] and others. Recently, the antibody-GPIbα interaction in immune thrombocytopenia has been highlighted. Some anti-GPIbα antibodies cause platelet activation and desialylation (removal of sugars), followed by the clearance of desialylated platelets via Ashwell-Morell receptors on hepatocytes [73, 74].

Developing novel antiplatelet agents against GPIbα

Given the critical roles of GPIbα or GPIbα-VWF interactions in platelet adhesion, particularly under stenosis high-shear conditions, they are attractive targets in attenuating thrombosis [54, 75, 76]. Currently, two such agents are in active clinical trials. ALX-0081 (Caplacizumab), an anti-VWF humanized single-variable-domain immunoglobulin (Nanobody), binds to the A1 domains of VWF with high affinity [77]. The phase I and II clinical trials of ALX-0081 in patients with stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or high risk PCI patients have shown a promising antiplatelet effects, and a relatively safe profile [77, 78]. The phase III clinical trials will investigate its effects on acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) [7981]. ARC1779, an anti-VWF aptamer, was previously reported as an encouraging agent; however, the clinical trial of ARC1779 was prematurely terminated [82]. These VWF inhibitors may be useful candidates for TTP treatment.

A direct anti-GPIbα drug, Anfibatide, is purified from the snake venom of Agkistrodon acutus [83, 84]. Notably, Anfibatide inhibits both VWF and α-thrombin binding to GPIbα, representing a more potent anti-thrombotic effect [85]. In experimental models, Anfibatide inhibited platelet adhesion, aggregation and thrombus formation, without increasing bleeding time [83]. The phase II human clinical trials have also shown the promise of Anfibatide being utilized as a novel antiplatelet agent in cardiovascular diseases without significantly affecting hemostasis in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (unpublished data) [85]. Additionally, anti-GPIbα antibody displayed a strong protective effect in the mouse stroke models without inducing significant intracranial bleeding [8688]. Anfibatide has also been shown as a candidate to treat ischemic stroke in experimental models [89] (the same may hold true for anti-VWF therapy) and deserves further investigation. There are some other preclinical agents targeting GPIbα that are under investigation, such as h6B4-Fab [90], GPG-290 [91], and anti-GPIbα NIT family monoclonal antibodies [92]. The generation of these novel antagonists is reaching the forefront of treatment against heart attack and stroke, although the efficacy and safety of these drugs remain to be further established or evaluated in human clinical trials. Notably, there are currently no clinically available direct GPIbα antagonists.

GPVI: a potential anti-thrombotic target

GPVI (immunoglobulin superfamily protein) is exclusively expressed on platelets and megakaryocytes. It is associated with the Fc receptor γ-chain, which contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). Cross-linking by ligands, such as collagen, leads to ITAM-dependent signalling, and platelet activation. A possible anti-thrombotic benefit of targeting PI3-kinase/Akt pathway on ITAM receptors was suggested [93]. Fibrin has also been identified as a new GPVI ligand [94]. The GPVI ectodomain interacts with immobilized fibrin, which amplifies thrombin generation, and promotes thrombus stabilization [94, 95].

The role of platelet GPVI in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke has been gradually acknowledged [9698]. Notably, platelet adhesion/activation can enhance infarct growth by promoting an inflammatory response [88, 99, 100]. GPVI-mediated platelet activation can lead to the release of interleukin-1α that drives cerebrovascular inflammation [100]. GPVI may be thus a potential antiplatelet target [97, 101, 102]. In animal models, anti-GPVI protected against thrombosis, ischemia-reperfusion injury [103] and stroke [104]. In phase I clinical trials, Revacept (the humanized Fc fusion protein of the GPVI ectodomain), inhibited collagen-induced human platelet aggregation [105]. Phase II trials of Revacept in patients with carotid artery stenosis, TIA, or stroke are ongoing [106]. The efficacy and safety of Revacept in these patients will be further determined. Some other GPVI targeted agents that are under preclinical development, such as Losartan [107] and scFv9012 [108], have been shown to inhibit the binding of GPVI to collagen.

Platelet integrin receptors

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors, which are involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions [30]. There are six different integrins on platelet surfaces: α2β1, α5β1, α6β1, αLβ2, αIIbβ3, and ανβ3. Platelet integrin αIIbβ3 is the dominant integrin expressed on platelets. Given the critical roles of αIIbβ3 integrin in mediating platelet aggregation, αIIbβ3 antagonists have been widely used for nearly two decades.

Integrin αIIbβ3 as anti-thrombotic targets: lessons and opportunities

Approximately 17 % of total platelet surface proteins are αIIbβ3 integrin, which contains both αIIb and β3 subunits [4]. Platelet “outside-in” signals are induced following platelet adhesion and platelet activation (e.g. GPIbα-VWF, GPVI/α2β1-collagen, P2Y12-ADP, PARs-thrombin), resulting in an increased Ca2+ influx and ultimately “inside-out” signaling. These “inside-out” signals further drive the conformational changes of αIIbβ3, from a low to high affinity state for binding to its ligands (e.g. fibrinogen/fibrin, VWF, fibronectin, thrombospondin, vitronectin and unidentified “X” ligands) [109112].

Fibrinogen, a major prothrombotic ligand of αIIbβ3, has been documented to be required for platelet aggregation for over 50 years. However, platelet aggregation still occurs in the absence of fibrinogen and VWF, although in the absence of αIIbβ3, aggregation is abolished [5, 8, 21, 113116]. The discovery of “fibrinogen-independent platelet aggregation” demonstrates that unidentified αIIbβ3 ligands also mediate platelet aggregation [5, 8, 21, 113, 116], and have the potential to be novel anti-thrombotic targets. Interestingly, some ligands (e.g. plasma fibronectin, vitronectin) may block prothrombotic ligand (e.g. fibrinogen)-αIIbβ3 interactions and attenuate thrombosis [21, 117].

Three FDA-approved αIIbβ3 antagonists are available: Abciximab (ReoPro), Eptifibatide (Integrilin) and Tirofiban (Aggrastat) [118120]. Abciximab is a fragmented antibody that binds close to the ligand binding-pocket on αIIbβ3. Eptifibatide, isolated from snake venom, binds via a KGD sequence and is a competitive inhibitor for fibrinogen-αIIbβ3, whilst tirofiban is a small molecule RGD inhibitor. Currently, αIIbβ3 antagonists are used in patients undergoing PCI and significantly decrease the incidence of myocardial infarction and death [121]. However, these antagonists can induce further conformational changes in the β3 subunit that may have negative consequences, such as exposing previously hidden epitopes, and causing platelet activation [122]. αIIbβ3 antagonists are also associated with intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke [123]. Therefore, a safer and more specific on-target drug is required to provide better patient care. Recently, a novel αIIbβ3 antagonist, RUC-4 (a more potent and more soluble congener of RUC-2 that disrupts Mg2+ binding to the metal ion-dependent adhesion site of αIIbβ3), is suggested for prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction in animal models, without significantly priming the receptor to bind fibrinogen [124]. However, the possibility of increased bleeding with therapeutic doses of RUC-4 remains to be evaluated [124].

The plexin-semaphorin-integrin (PSI) domain, located near the N-terminus of the β3 subunit, is highly conserved across the integrin family in different species, and contains seven cysteine residues which have been implicated in regulating β2 integrin activation [125, 126]. Previous studies described a role for cysteine-derived thiol/disulfide groups in the conformational switches of the β3 integrin [127130]. Disulfide bond remodeling is mediated primarily by thiol isomerase enzymatic activity, which is derived from active CXXC thioredoxin motifs and plays a role in the activation of αIIbβ3 [131]. Our group has recently identified that integrin PSI domain has endogenous thiol isomerase function and could be a novel target for anti-thrombotic therapy (unpublished data) [132]. We found that both CXXC motifs of β3 integrin PSI domain are required to maintain the optimal enzyme function, since mutations to one or both of the CXXC motifs decrease or abolish their protein disulphide isomerase (PDI)-like activity. We developed anti-PSI monoclonal antibodies and found that these antibodies cross-reacted with β3 PSI domains of human and other species and specifically inhibited the PDI-like activity, integrin activation and reduced PAC-1 binding to β3 integrin. Importantly, anti-PSI abrogated murine and human platelet aggregation in vitro and thrombus growth ex vivo and in vivo in both small and large vessels without significantly affecting bleeding time or platelet count. Thus, integrin PSI domain contains endogenous PDI activity and is a key regulator of integrin activation that can be a new target for therapy.

Interestingly, targeting activated platelets αIIbβ3 has been considered into the development of novel fibrinolytic drugs, which may allow effective thrombolysis and thromboprophylaxis [14, 133]. For example, scFvSCE5 (a single-chain urokinase plasminogen activator fused to a small recombinant antibody that binds activated αIIbβ3) directly targets thrombi and exerts an effective thrombolysis [133]. A chimeric platelet-targeted urokinase prodrug (composed of a single-chain version of the variable region of an anti-αIIbβ3 mAb and a thrombin-activatable, low-molecular-weight pro-uPA) selectively targets new thrombus formation [134].

Other platelet integrins: α2β1, α6β1 and α5β1

Other integrin receptors may also be considered as novel anti-thrombotic targets [16, 135]. Platelet α2β1 promotes stable platelet adhesion to collagen and may be a viable option, since overexpression of α2β1 in humans increases atherothrombotic risk, but lower level of α2β1 does not enhance bleeding risk [16]. Experimental evidence shows that α2β1 inhibitors (e.g. snake venom EMS-16) reduced pathological thrombus formation in vivo [136138]. Platelet α6β1, the main receptor for laminin, plays a role in platelet adhesion/activation and arterial thrombosis, and may also be a new target [135]. Platelet α5β1, the major receptor for fibronectin, plays a supplementary role in platelet adhesion [139], but evidence is lacking regarding the anti-thrombotic benefits of antagonizing α5β1.

Other novel anti-thrombotic candidates: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, P-selectin, CD40/CD40L, and Toll-like receptors

Strategies to target other platelet receptors beyond adhesive proteins have also been developed, such as P2Y12, PAR1, TP, 5HT2A antagonists [17, 140]. Interestingly, some chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis, are associated with arterial thrombosis [23, 141]. Recently, our group identified that a functional Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) is expressed on human megakaryocytes and platelets [142]. Importantly, GLP-1R agonists (e.g. Exenatide), likely through increasing the intracellular cAMP levels, inhibit platelet function and thrombus formation [142]. This study provides important insights into why diabetic patients who are receiving GLP-1-targeted therapies have a reduced number of cardiovascular events [142, 143]. In addition, given the cross-talks between platelets and immune systems, thrombosis also intensively communicates with the inflammatory pathway [23]. Some anti-inflammatory/anti-atherosclerotic agents may therefore also indirectly inhibit thrombosis, especially in deep vein thrombosis [144]. For example, antagonists of P-selectin/PSGL-1, such as rPSGL-Ig [145], PSI-697 [146], PSI-421 [147], inhibit platelet-mediated leukocyte attachment and recruitment of procoagulant microparticles, and may represent a safe therapeutic intervention in accelerating thrombolysis [148]. Antagonists of CD40/CD40L [149], such as CD40 antibody, reduce atherosclerotic burden in a murine model [150]. In addition, as the important roles of Toll-like receptors in atherosclerosis are gradually recognized [151, 152], they may also be potential targets for the treatment of atherothrombosis.

Conclusions

Arterial thrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism, are three leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [153]. Platelets play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis, and contribute profoundly to the pathology of venous thrombosis [23]. Platelet adhesion molecules, act as the contacts between platelets and other cells or extracellular matrix proteins and, to a great extent, may determine the reactivity of platelets and thus are attractive anti-thrombotic targets (Fig. 1) [23]. Although evidence-based antiplatelet therapy has markedly improved patient care, on-treatment events and bleeding are still major concerns [17, 148].

Optimization of the use of currently available therapies, and improvements to the understanding of individual differences in response to anti-platelet treatments are still the most cost-effective treatment strategies [17, 148]. Additionally, improved understanding of the mechanisms of platelet accumulation has been critical for further developing novel antiplatelet therapies, such as the PAR1 antagonist Vorapaxar (recently approved by the FDA), GPIbα/VWF antagonists (e.g. ALX-0081 and Anfibatide; undergoing clinical trials), and GPVI antagonist (e.g. Revacept; undergoing clinical trials) (See section II. A-C). Another cost-effective strategy may be to repurpose already-established drugs by discovering novel mechanisms of action in anti-thrombotic diseases, such as the recently-identified GLP-1R agonist, Exenatide, an anti-diabetic drug that has potential anti-thrombotic effects [142, 154]. Future studies in the areas of atherothrombosis, inflammation, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, lipid metabolism and cancer-related thrombotic diseases in the next few years should advance our knowledge and the application of these and other new anti-platelet agents. Of note, clinical trials provide important evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the treatments. However, difficulties such as narrow eligibility criteria, low enrollment of patients and the necessity to test the new drugs on top of the current dual antiplatelet therapy (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel), may add complexity to the development of new drugs and also deserve our attention.

Abbreviations

ADP: 

Adenosine diphosphate

GLP-1R: 

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor

GP: 

Glycoprotein

ITAM: 

Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif

ITP: 

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

LLR: 

Leucine-rich repeat

PAR: 

Protease-activated receptor

PCI: 

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PDI: 

Protein disulphide isomerase

PSI: 

Plexin-semaphorin-integrin

TIA: 

Transient ischemic attack

TTP: 

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

VWF: 

von Willebrand factor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Richard O. Hynes, Dr. Zaverio M. Ruggeri, Dr. Denisa D. Wagner, and Dr. John Freedman for their long-term support for these research projects.

Declaration

Publication fees for this article have been funded by APSTH 2016.

This article has been published as part of Thrombosis Journal Volume 14 Supplement 1, 2016. The full contents of the supplement are available at https://thrombosisjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-14-supplement-1.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 119540, MOP 97918, and MOP 119551), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (Ontario), Equipment Funds from Canada Foundation for Innovation, St. Michael’s Hospital, and Canadian Blood Services; and research Funds from CCOA Therapeutics Inc and Lee’s Pharmaceutical Holdings limited. X. R. X is a recipient of China National Scholarship award, Meredith & Malcolm Silver Scholarship in Cardiovascular Studies of Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence Studentship award, University of Toronto. N.C. is a recipient of the Canadian Blood Services Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

XRX and NC drafted the manuscript. MADN drew the figure. TM, TWS and RMPC contributed to preparation of the manuscript. XL, XD and BXL contributed to the original findings on the phase II human clinical trials of Anfibatide. PC and JX contributed to the original findings and further development of anti-PSI monoclonal antibodies. HN is the principal investigator who defined the topic and revised the manuscript. All of authors read, commented and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

J. X. is supported by the CCOA Therapeutics Inc. X. D. and B.X.L. are supported by the Lee’s Pharmaceutical Holdings limited. Some of the research fund of the projects is supported by CCOA Therapeutics and Lee’s Pharmaceutical Holdings limited. Canadian Blood Services have held the patents on the anti-GPIb NIT family monoclonal antibodies and anti-PSI monoclonal antibodies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael’s Hospital
(3)
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
(4)
Canadian Blood Services
(5)
CCOA Therapeutics Inc
(6)
Lee’s Pharmaceutical holdings limited
(7)
Zhaoke Pharmaceutical co. limited
(8)
Hong Kong University of Science and technology
(9)
Department of Medicine and Department of Physiology, University of Toronto

References

  1. Ruggeri ZM. Platelets in atherothrombosis. Nat Med. 2002;8:1227–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mackman N. Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis. Nature. 2008;451:914–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu XR, Gallant RC, Ni H. Platelets, immune-mediated thrombocytopenias, and fetal hemorrhage. Thromb Res. 2016;141 Suppl 2:S76–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ni H, Freedman J. Platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis: role of integrins and their ligands. Transfus Apher Sci. 2003;28:257–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yang H, Reheman A, Chen P, Zhu G, Hynes RO, Freedman J, et al. Fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor-independent platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2230–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang Y, Gallant RC, Ni H. Extracellular matrix proteins in the regulation of thrombus formation. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23:280–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Moroi M, Jung SM, Okuma M, Shinmyozu K. A patient with platelets deficient in glycoprotein VI that lack both collagen-induced aggregation and adhesion. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:1440–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunne E, Spring CM, Reheman A, Jin W, Berndt MC, Newman DK, et al. Cadherin 6 has a functional role in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:1724–31.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Palabrica T, Lobb R, Furie BC, Aronovitz M, Benjamin C, Hsu YM, et al. Leukocyte accumulation promoting fibrin deposition is mediated in vivo by P-selectin on adherent platelets. Nature. 1992;359:848–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang H, Lang S, Zhai Z, Li L, Kahr WH, Chen P, et al. Fibrinogen is required for maintenance of platelet intracellular and cell-surface P-selectin expression. Blood. 2009;114:425–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nurden AT. Platelet membrane glycoproteins: a historical review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40:577–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lopez JA, Andrews RK, Afshar-Kharghan V, Berndt MC. Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Blood. 1998;91:4397–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson SP. Arterial thrombosis--insidious, unpredictable and deadly. Nat Med. 2011;17:1423–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Reheman A, Xu X, Reddy EC, Ni H. Targeting activated platelets and fibrinolysis: hitting two birds with one stone. Circ Res. 2014;114:1070–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Writing Group Members, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:e38–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Michelson AD. Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:154–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:30–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gachet C. Antiplatelet drugs: which targets for which treatments? J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13 Suppl 1:S313–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hou Y, Carrim N, Wang Y, Gallant RC, Marshall A, Ni H. Platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis: novel mechanisms of fibrinogen-independent platelet aggregation and fibronectin-mediated protein wave of hemostasis. J Biomed Res. 2015;29:437–44.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang H, Bang KW, Blanchette VS, Nurden AT, Rand ML. Phosphatidylserine exposure, microparticle formation and mitochondrial depolarisation in Glanzmann thrombasthenia platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:1184–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Reheman A, Spring CM, Kalantari J, Marshall AH, Wolberg AS, et al. Plasma fibronectin supports hemostasis and regulates thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4281–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Y, Ni H. Fibronectin maintains the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(17):3265–77. doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2225-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu XR, Zhang D, Oswald BE, Carrim N, Wang X, Hou Y, et al. Platelets are versatile cells: New discoveries in hemostasis, thrombosis, immune responses, tumor metastasis and beyond. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016. Published online:1–69. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2016.1200008.
  24. Metharom P, Berndt MC, Baker RI, Andrews RK. Current state and novel approaches of antiplatelet therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:1327–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Michelson AD. Advances in antiplatelet therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:62–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson SP, Schoenwaelder SM. Antiplatelet therapy: in search of the ‘magic bullet’. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:775–89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP, Ameriso SF, Dalby AJ, Fish MP, et al. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1404–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Adminstration USFaD. Drug Trials Snapshot Zontivity (vorapaxar). 2014. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ucm423935.htm. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  29. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2011. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00527943?term=Vorapaxar&rank=5. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  30. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673–87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mou Y, Ni H, Wilkins JA. The selective inhibition of beta 1 and beta 7 integrin-mediated lymphocyte adhesion by bacitracin. J Immunol. 1998;161:6323–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Clemetson KJ, Clemetson JM. Platelet receptors. In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier; 2013. p. 169–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Varga-Szabo D, Pleines I, Nieswandt B. Cell adhesion mechanisms in platelets. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:403–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura S, Suzuki-Inoue K, Tsukiji N, Shirai T, Sasaki T, Osada M, et al. Podoplanin-positive periarteriolar stromal cells promote megakaryocyte growth and proplatelet formation in mice by CLEC-2. Blood. 2016;127:1701–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li C, Li J, Li Y, Lang S, Yougbare I, Zhu G, et al. Crosstalk between platelets and the immune system: old systems with new discoveries. Adv Hematol. 2012;2012:384685.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Semple JW, Italiano Jr JE, Freedman J. Platelets and the immune continuum. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:264–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wagner DD, Burger PC. Platelets in inflammation and thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:2131–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Siegel-Axel D, Daub K, Seizer P, Lindemann S, Gawaz M. Platelet lipoprotein interplay: trigger of foam cell formation and driver of atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;78:8–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lindemann S, Kramer B, Seizer P, Gawaz M. Platelets, inflammation and atherosclerosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5 Suppl 1:203–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy AJ, Bijl N, Yvan-Charvet L, Welch CB, Bhagwat N, Reheman A, et al. Cholesterol efflux in megakaryocyte progenitors suppresses platelet production and thrombocytosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:586–94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hess PR, Rawnsley DR, Jakus Z, Yang Y, Sweet DT, Fu J, et al. Platelets mediate lymphovenous hemostasis to maintain blood-lymphatic separation throughout life. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:273–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Navarro-Nunez L, Langan SA, Nash GB, Watson SP. The physiological and pathophysiological roles of platelet CLEC-2. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:991–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Osada M, Inoue O, Ding G, Shirai T, Ichise H, Hirayama K, et al. Platelet activation receptor CLEC-2 regulates blood/lymphatic vessel separation by inhibiting proliferation, migration, and tube formation of lymphatic endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:22241–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Herzog BH, Fu J, Wilson SJ, Hess PR, Sen A, McDaniel JM, et al. Podoplanin maintains high endothelial venule integrity by interacting with platelet CLEC-2. Nature. 2013;502:105–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Italiano Jr JE, Richardson JL, Patel-Hett S, Battinelli E, Zaslavsky A, Short S, et al. Angiogenesis is regulated by a novel mechanism: pro- and antiangiogenic proteins are organized into separate platelet alpha granules and differentially released. Blood. 2008;111:1227–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Chatterjee M, Huang Z, Zhang W, Jiang L, Hultenby K, Zhu L, et al. Distinct platelet packaging, release, and surface expression of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors on different platelet stimuli. Blood. 2011;117:3907–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Yougbare I, Lang S, Yang H, Chen P, Zhao X, Tai WS, et al. Maternal anti-platelet beta3 integrins impair angiogenesis and cause intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1545–56.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Li C, Piran S, Chen P, Lang S, Zarpellon A, Jin JW, et al. The maternal immune response to fetal platelet GPIbalpha causes frequent miscarriage in mice that can be prevented by intravenous IgG and anti-FcRn therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4537–47.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yougbare I, Wei-She T, Zdravic D, Chen P, Zhu G, Leong-Poi H, et al. Natural killer cells contribute to pathophysiology of placenta leading to miscarriage in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2015;126:2254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Labelle M, Hynes RO. The initial hours of metastasis: the importance of cooperative host-tumor cell interactions during hematogenous dissemination. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:1091–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Platelets guide the formation of early metastatic niches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E3053–61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Franco AT, Corken A, Ware J. Platelets at the interface of thrombosis, inflammation, and cancer. Blood. 2015;126:582–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Luo SZ, Mo X, Afshar-Kharghan V, Srinivasan S, Lopez JA, Li R. Glycoprotein Ibalpha forms disulfide bonds with 2 glycoprotein Ibbeta subunits in the resting platelet. Blood. 2007;109:603–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Jackson SP. The growing complexity of platelet aggregation. Blood. 2007;109:5087–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruggeri ZM, Mendolicchio GL. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Circ Res. 2007;100:1673–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Huizinga EG, Tsuji S, Romijn RA, Schiphorst ME, de Groot PG, Sixma JJ, et al. Structures of glycoprotein Ibalpha and its complex with von Willebrand factor A1 domain. Science. 2002;297:1176–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Verhenne S, Denorme F, Libbrecht S, Vandenbulcke A, Pareyn I, Deckmyn H, et al. Platelet-derived VWF is not essential for normal thrombosis and hemostasis but fosters ischemic stroke injury in mice. Blood. 2015;126:1715–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Dumas JJ, Kumar R, Seehra J, Somers WS, Mosyak L. Crystal structure of the GpIbalpha-thrombin complex essential for platelet aggregation. Science. 2003;301:222–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Celikel R, McClintock RA, Roberts JR, Mendolicchio GL, Ware J, Varughese KI, et al. Modulation of alpha-thrombin function by distinct interactions with platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha. Science. 2003;301:218–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Andrews RK, Berndt MC. The GPIb-IX-V Complex. In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier; 2013. p. 195–213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. De Candia E, Hall SW, Rutella S, Landolfi R, Andrews RK, De Cristofaro R. Binding of thrombin to glycoprotein Ib accelerates the hydrolysis of Par-1 on intact platelets. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:4692–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Ramakrishnan V, DeGuzman F, Bao M, Hall SW, Leung LL, Phillips DR. A thrombin receptor function for platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX unmasked by cleavage of glycoprotein V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1823–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Ni H, Ramakrishnan V, Ruggeri ZM, Papalia JM, Phillips DR, Wagner DD. Increased thrombogenesis and embolus formation in mice lacking glycoprotein V. Blood. 2001;98:368–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Jurk K, Clemetson KJ, de Groot PG, Brodde MF, Steiner M, Savion N, et al. Thrombospondin-1 mediates platelet adhesion at high shear via glycoprotein Ib (GPIb): an alternative/backup mechanism to von Willebrand factor. FASEB J. 2003;17:1490–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Baglia FA, Badellino KO, Li CQ, Lopez JA, Walsh PN. Factor XI binding to the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex promotes factor XI activation by thrombin. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1662–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Bradford HN, Pixley RA, Colman RW. Human factor XII binding to the glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:22756–63.
  67. Weeterings C, de Groot PG, Adelmeijer J, Lisman T. The glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex contributes to tissue factor-independent thrombin generation by recombinant factor VIIa on the activated platelet surface. Blood. 2008;112:3227–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Chavakis T, Santoso S, Clemetson KJ, Sachs UJ, Isordia-Salas I, Pixley RA, et al. High molecular weight kininogen regulates platelet-leukocyte interactions by bridging Mac-1 and glycoprotein Ib. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:45375–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Romo GM, Dong JF, Schade AJ, Gardiner EE, Kansas GS, Li CQ, et al. The glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex is a platelet counterreceptor for P-selectin. J Exp Med. 1999;190:803–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Kaplan ZS, Zarpellon A, Alwis I, Yuan Y, McFadyen J, Ghasemzadeh M, et al. Thrombin-dependent intravascular leukocyte trafficking regulated by fibrin and the platelet receptors GPIb and PAR4. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7835.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Simon DI, Chen Z, Xu H, Li CQ, Dong J, McIntire LV, et al. Platelet glycoprotein ibalpha is a counterreceptor for the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). J Exp Med. 2000;192:193–204.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Chandraratne S, von Bruehl ML, Pagel JI, Stark K, Kleinert E, Konrad I, et al. Critical role of platelet glycoprotein ibalpha in arterial remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:589–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Li J, van der Wal DE, Zhu G, Xu M, Yougbare I, Ma L, et al. Desialylation is a mechanism of Fc-independent platelet clearance and a therapeutic target in immune thrombocytopenia. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7737.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Li J, Callum JL, Lin Y, Zhou Y, Zhu G, Ni H. Severe platelet desialylation in a patient with glycoprotein Ib/IX antibody-mediated immune thrombocytopenia and fatal pulmonary hemorrhage. Haematologica. 2014;99:e61–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Gresele P, Momi S. Inhibitors of the interaction between von Willebrand factor and platelet GPIb/IX/V. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012;(210):287–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Ulrichts H, Silence K, Schoolmeester A, de Jaegere P, Rossenu S, Roodt J, et al. Antithrombotic drug candidate ALX-0081 shows superior preclinical efficacy and safety compared with currently marketed antiplatelet drugs. Blood. 2011;118:757–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Bartunek J, Barbato E, Heyndrickx G, Vanderheyden M, Wijns W, Holz JB. Novel antiplatelet agents: ALX-0081, a Nanobody directed towards von Willebrand factor. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:355–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Muller O, Bartunek J, Hamilos M, Berza CT, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A, et al. von Willebrand factor inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with stable angina. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:364–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Peyvandi F, Scully M, Kremer Hovinga JA, Cataland S, Knobl P, Wu H, et al. Caplacizumab for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:511–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Lammle B. Thrombotic microangiopathy: caplacizumab accelerates resolution of acute acquired TTP. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:259–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Von VA. Willebrand factor--a new target for TTP treatment? N Engl J Med. 2016;374:583–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Blombery P, Scully M. Management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: current perspectives. J Blood Med. 2014;5:15–23.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Lei X, Reheman A, Hou Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, Marshall AH, et al. Anfibatide, a novel GPIb complex antagonist, inhibits platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vitro and in vivo in murine models of thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:279–89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Hou Y, Li BX, Dai X, Yang Z, Qian F, Zhang G, et al. The first in vitro and in vivo assessment of anfibatide, a novel glycoprotein ib antagonist, in mice and in a phase i human clinical trial. Blood. 2013;122:577.Google Scholar
  85. Li B, Dai X, Yang Z, Qian F, Zhang G, Xu Z, et al. First ex vivo and in vivo assessment of anfibatide, a novel glycoprotein Ib-IV-V complex antagonist, in healthy human volunteers in phase I clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11 Suppl 2:23.Google Scholar
  86. Nieswandt B, Kleinschnitz C, Stoll G. Ischaemic stroke: a thrombo-inflammatory disease? J Physiol. 2011;589:4115–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Stoll G, Kleinschnitz C, Nieswandt B. Molecular mechanisms of thrombus formation in ischemic stroke: novel insights and targets for treatment. Blood. 2008;112:3555–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Kleinschnitz C, Pozgajova M, Pham M, Bendszus M, Nieswandt B, Stoll G. Targeting platelets in acute experimental stroke: impact of glycoprotein Ib, VI, and IIb/IIIa blockade on infarct size, functional outcome, and intracranial bleeding. Circulation. 2007;115:2323–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Li TT, Fan ML, Hou SX, Li XY, Barry DM, Jin H, Luo SY, Kong F, Lau LF, Dai XR, Zhang GH, Zhou LL. A novel snake venomderived GPIb antagonist, anfibatide, protects mice from acute experimental ischaemic stroke and reperfusion injury. Br J Pharmacol.
  90. Fontayne A, Meiring M, Lamprecht S, Roodt J, Demarsin E, Barbeaux P, et al. The humanized anti-glycoprotein Ib monoclonal antibody h6B4-Fab is a potent and safe antithrombotic in a high shear arterial thrombosis model in baboons. Thromb Haemost. 2008;100:670–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Hennan JK, Swillo RE, Morgan GA, Leik CE, Brooks JM, Shaw GD, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of platelet vWF-GPIb alpha interaction prevents coronary artery thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:469–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Ni H, Zhu G. Novel monoclonal antibodies against platelet GPIb-alpha: potential anti-thrombotic drugs and research reagents for study of thrombosis and hemostasis. 2012. US8323652.Google Scholar
  93. Moroi AJ, Watson SP. Impact of the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway on ITAM and hemITAM receptors: haemostasis, platelet activation and antithrombotic therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;94:186–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Alshehri OM, Hughes CE, Montague S, Watson SK, Frampton J, Bender M, et al. Fibrin activates GPVI in human and mouse platelets. Blood. 2015;126:1601–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Mammadova-Bach E, Ollivier V, Loyau S, Schaff M, Dumont B, Favier R, et al. Platelet glycoprotein VI binds to polymerized fibrin and promotes thrombin generation. Blood. 2015;126:683–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Bigalke B, Stellos K, Geisler T, Kremmer E, Seizer P, May AE, et al. Expression of platelet glycoprotein VI is associated with transient ischemic attack and stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:111–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Induruwa I, Jung SM, Warburton EA. Beyond antiplatelets: the role of glycoprotein VI in ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2016. doi:10.1177/1747493016654532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Al-Tamimi M, Gardiner EE, Thom JY, Shen Y, Cooper MN, Hankey GJ, et al. Soluble glycoprotein VI is raised in the plasma of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:498–500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Stoll G, Kleinschnitz C, Nieswandt B. Combating innate inflammation: a new paradigm for acute treatment of stroke? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1207:149–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Thornton P, McColl BW, Greenhalgh A, Denes A, Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Platelet interleukin-1alpha drives cerebrovascular inflammation. Blood. 2010;115:3632–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Stegner D, Haining EJ, Nieswandt B. Targeting glycoprotein VI and the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif signaling pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1615–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Dutting S, Bender M, Nieswandt B. Platelet GPVI: a target for antithrombotic therapy?! Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33:583–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Pachel C, Mathes D, Arias-Loza AP, Heitzmann W, Nordbeck P, Deppermann C, et al. Inhibition of platelet GPVI protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:629–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Goebel S, Li Z, Vogelmann J, Holthoff HP, Degen H, Hermann DM, et al. The GPVI-Fc fusion protein Revacept improves cerebral infarct volume and functional outcome in stroke. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66960.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Ungerer M, Rosport K, Bultmann A, Piechatzek R, Uhland K, Schlieper P, et al. Novel antiplatelet drug revacept (Dimeric Glycoprotein VI-Fc) specifically and efficiently inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation without affecting general hemostasis in humans. Circulation. 2011;123:1891–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01645306?term=Revacept&rank=1 . Accessed 15 June 2016.
  107. Ono K, Ueda H, Yoshizawa Y, Akazawa D, Tanimura R, Shimada I, et al. Structural basis for platelet antiaggregation by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan (DuP-753) via glycoprotein VI. J Med Chem. 2010;53:2087–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Muzard J, Bouabdelli M, Zahid M, Ollivier V, Lacapere JJ, Jandrot-Perrus M, et al. Design and humanization of a murine scFv that blocks human platelet glycoprotein VI in vitro. FEBS J. 2009;276:4207–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Takagi J, Petre BM, Walz T, Springer TA. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell. 2002;110:599–611.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Li R, Mitra N, Gratkowski H, Vilaire G, Litvinov R, Nagasami C, et al. Activation of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 by modulation of transmembrane helix associations. Science. 2003;300:795–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Vinogradova O, Vaynberg J, Kong X, Haas TA, Plow EF, Qin J. Membrane-mediated structural transitions at the cytoplasmic face during integrin activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4094–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Vinogradova O, Velyvis A, Velyviene A, Hu B, Haas T, Plow E, et al. A structural mechanism of integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) “inside-out” activation as regulated by its cytoplasmic face. Cell. 2002;110:587–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Ni H, Denis CV, Subbarao S, Degen JL, Sato TN, Hynes RO, et al. Persistence of platelet thrombus formation in arterioles of mice lacking both von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:385–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Law DA, DeGuzman FR, Heiser P, Ministri-Madrid K, Killeen N, Phillips DR. Integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motif is required for outside-in alphaIIbbeta3 signalling and platelet function. Nature. 1999;401:808–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Hodivala-Dilke KM, McHugh KP, Tsakiris DA, Rayburn H, Crowley D, Ullman-Cullere M, et al. Beta3-integrin-deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:229–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Reheman A, Yang H, Zhu G, Jin W, He F, Spring CM, et al. Plasma fibronectin depletion enhances platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in mice lacking fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2009;113:1809–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Reheman A, Gross P, Yang H, Chen P, Allen D, Leytin V, et al. Vitronectin stabilizes thrombi and vessel occlusion but plays a dual role in platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:875–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Topol EJ, Byzova TV, Plow EF. Platelet GPIIb-IIIa blockers. Lancet. 1999;353:227–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Phillips DR, Scarborough RM. Clinical pharmacology of eptifibatide. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:11B–20B.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Egbertson MS, Chang CT, Duggan ME, Gould RJ, Halczenko W, Hartman GD, et al. Non-peptide fibrinogen receptor antagonists. 2. Optimization of a tyrosine template as a mimic for Arg-Gly-Asp. J Med Chem. 1994;37:2537–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Schneider DJ. Anti-platelet therapy: glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72:672–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Coller BS. alphaIIbbeta3: structure and function. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13 Suppl 1:S17–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Ciccone A, Motto C, Abraha I, Cozzolino F, Santilli I. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD005208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Li J, Vootukuri S, Shang Y, Negri A, Jiang JK, Nedelman M, et al. RUC-4: a novel alphaIIbbeta3 antagonist for prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2321–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Xiong JP, Stehle T, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA. A novel adaptation of the integrin PSI domain revealed from its crystal structure. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:40252–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Zang Q, Springer TA. Amino acid residues in the PSI domain and cysteine-rich repeats of the integrin beta2 subunit that restrain activation of the integrin alpha(X)beta(2). J Biol Chem. 2001;276:6922–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Ni H, Li A, Simonsen N, Wilkins JA. Integrin activation by dithiothreitol or Mn2+ induces a ligand-occupied conformation and exposure of a novel NH2-terminal regulatory site on the beta1 integrin chain. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:7981–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Yan B, Smith JW. A redox site involved in integrin activation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39964–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Essex DW, Li M. Redox control of platelet aggregation. Biochemistry. 2003;42:129–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Manickam N, Ahmad SS, Essex DW. Vicinal thiols are required for activation of the alphaIIbbeta3 platelet integrin. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1207–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Wang L, Wu Y, Zhou J, Ahmad SS, Mutus B, Garbi N, et al. Platelet-derived ERp57 mediates platelet incorporation into a growing thrombus by regulation of the alphaIIbbeta3 integrin. Blood. 2013;122:3642–50.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Carrim N, Zhu G, Reddy E, Xu M, Xu X, Wang Y, et al. Integrin PSI domain has endogenous thiol isomerase function and is a novel target for anti-thrombotic therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13(Supplement S2):60.Google Scholar
  133. Wang X, Palasubramaniam J, Gkanatsas Y, Hohmann JD, Westein E, Kanojia R, et al. Towards effective and safe thrombolysis and thromboprophylaxis: preclinical testing of a novel antibody-targeted recombinant plasminogen activator directed against activated platelets. Circ Res. 2014;114:1083–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Fuentes RE, Zaitsev S, Ahn HS, Hayes V, Kowalska M, Lambert MP, et al. A chimeric platelet-targeted urokinase prodrug selectively blocks new thrombus formation. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:483–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Schaff M, Tang C, Maurer E, Bourdon C, Receveur N, Eckly A, et al. Integrin alpha6beta1 is the main receptor for vascular laminins and plays a role in platelet adhesion, activation, and arterial thrombosis. Circulation. 2013;128:541–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Miller MW, Basra S, Kulp DW, Billings PC, Choi S, Beavers MP, et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of integrin alpha2beta1 that prevent pathological thrombus formation via an allosteric mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:719–24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Marcinkiewicz C, Lobb RR, Marcinkiewicz MM, Daniel JL, Smith JB, Dangelmaier C, et al. Isolation and characterization of EMS16, a C-lectin type protein from Echis multisquamatus venom, a potent and selective inhibitor of the alpha2beta1 integrin. Biochemistry. 2000;39:9859–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Arlinghaus FT, Momic T, Ammar NA, Shai E, Spectre G, Varon D, et al. Identification of alpha2beta1 integrin inhibitor VP-i with anti-platelet properties in the venom of Vipera palaestinae. Toxicon. 2013;64:96–105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Piotrowicz RS, Orchekowski RP, Nugent DJ, Yamada KY, Kunicki TJ. Glycoprotein Ic-IIa functions as an activation-independent fibronectin receptor on human platelets. J Cell Biol. 1988;106:1359–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Przyklenk K, Frelinger 3rd AL, Linden MD, Whittaker P, Li Y, Barnard MR, et al. Targeted inhibition of the serotonin 5HT2A receptor improves coronary patency in an in vivo model of recurrent thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:331–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Ni H. The platelet “sugar high” in diabetes. Blood. 2012;119:5949–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Cameron-Vendrig A, Reheman A, Siraj MA, Xu XR, Wang Y, Lei X, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activation attenuates platelet aggregation and thrombosis. Diabetes. 2016;65:1714–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Monami M, Dicembrini I, Nardini C, Fiordelli I, Mannucci E. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:38–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Martinod K, Wagner DD. Thrombosis: tangled up in NETs. Blood. 2014;123:2768–76.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Kumar A, Villani MP, Patel UK, Keith Jr JC, Schaub RG. Recombinant soluble form of PSGL-1 accelerates thrombolysis and prevents reocclusion in a porcine model. Circulation. 1999;99:1363–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Bedard PW, Clerin V, Sushkova N, Tchernychev B, Antrilli T, Resmini C, et al. Characterization of the novel P-selectin inhibitor PSI-697 [2-(4-chlorobenzyl)-3-hydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[h] quinoline-4-carboxylic acid] in vitro and in rodent models of vascular inflammation and thrombosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324:497–506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Meier TR, Myers Jr DD, Wrobleski SK, Zajkowski PJ, Hawley AE, Bedard PW, et al. Prophylactic P-selectin inhibition with PSI-421 promotes resolution of venous thrombosis without anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:343–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Kolandaivelu K, Bhatt DL. Novel antiplatelet therapies. In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier; 2013. p. 1185–213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Conde ID, Kleiman NS. Soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2575–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Schonbeck U, Libby P. CD40 signaling and plaque instability. Circ Res. 2001;89:1092–103.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Lin J, Kakkar V, Lu X. Essential roles of toll-like receptors in atherosclerosis. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23:431–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Hovland A, Jonasson L, Garred P, Yndestad A, Aukrust P, Lappegard KT, et al. The complement system and toll-like receptors as integrated players in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241:480–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, Ortel TL. Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:S495–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Husain M, Aameron-Vendrig A, Ni H. Methods for inhibiting platelet aggregation using glp-1 receptor agonists. Google Patents; 2014. WO2014066992.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement